Skip to main content
Log in

Enriching user search experience by mining social streams with heuristic stones and associative ripples

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are becoming increasingly popular. The high accessibility of these sites has allowed the so-called social streams being spread across the Internet more quickly and widely, as more and more of the populations are being engaged into this vortex of the social networking revolution. Information seeking never means simply typing a few keywords into a search engine in this stream world. In this study, we try to find a way to utilize these diversified social streams to assist the search process without relying solely on the inputted keywords. We propose a method to analyze and extract meaningful information in accordance with users’ current needs and interests from social streams using two developed algorithms, and go further to integrate these organized stream data which are described as associative ripples into the search system, in order to improve the relevance of the results obtained from the search engine and feedback users with a new perspective of the sought issues to guide the further information seeking process, which can benefit both search experience enrichment and search process facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://upscloud.org/

References

  1. Aggarwal C, Han J, Wang J, Yu PS (2003) A framework for clustering evolving data streams. In: Proc. 2003 Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 81–92, Berlin, Germany

  2. Babcock B, Babu S, Datar M, Motwani R, Widom J (2002) Models and issues in data stream systems. In: Proc. 21st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

  3. Bilenko M, White RW (2008) Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: Identifying relevant websites from user activity. In: Proc. WWW2008, Beijing, pp. 51–60

  4. Bojars U, Breslin J, Finn A, Decker S (2008) Using the semantic web for linking and reusing data across web 2.0 communities. The Journal of Web Semantics 6(1):21–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buter B, Dijkshoorn N, Modolo D, Nguyen Q, van Noort S, van de Poel B, Ali Salah A, Akdag Salah AA (2011) Explorative visualization and analysis of a social network for arts: the case of deviantART. JoC 2(1):87–94

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Zhou XK, Man HF, Wu Y, Ahmed AU, Jin Q (2010) A framework of organic streams: Integrating dynamically diversified contents into ubiquitous personal study. In: 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Emerging Networks and Systems, Xi’an

  7. Chi EH (2009) Information seeking can be social. Computer 42(3):42–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Claudio Carpineto, Stanislaw Osiński, Giovanni Romano, Dawid Weiss (2009) A Survey of Web Clustering Engines. In: ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3)

  9. Ebner M (2009) Introducing live microblogging: how single presentations can be enhanced by the mass. Journal of research in innovative teaching 2(1):108–19

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ebner M, Lienhardt C, Rohs M, Meyer I (2010) Microblogs in higher education—a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Comput Educ 55(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang X, Liu Sheng OR (2004) LinkSelector: a web mining approach to hyperlink selection for web portals. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 4(2):209–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaber MM, Zaslavsky A, Krishnaswamy S (2005) Mining data streams: a review. ACM SIGMOD Record archive 34(2):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guha S, Meyerson A, Mishra N, Motwani R, O’Callaghan L (2003) Clustering data streams: theory and practice. TKDE special issue on clustering 15(3):515–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guha S, Mishra N, Motwani R, O’Callaghan L (2000) Clustering data streams. In: Proc. the Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jagadish HV, Mumick IS, Silberschatz A (1995) View maintenance issues for the chronicle data model. In: Proc. ACM/PODS1995, pp. 113–124

  16. Johnson KA (2011) The effect of Twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning Media and Technology 36(1):21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E (2011) The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J Comput Assist Learn 27(2):119–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klyuev V, Oleshchuk V (2011) Semantic retrieval: an approach to representing, searching and summarizing text documents. IJITCC 1(2):221–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ordonez C (2003) Clustering binary data streams with K-means. In: Proc. 8th ACM SIGMOD workshop on Research issues in data mining and knowledge discovery. ACM, San Diego, California, pp 12–9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Passant A, Bojars U, Breslin JG, Hastrup T, Stankovic M, and Laublet P (2010) An overview of SMOB 2: Open, Semantic and Distributed Micro-blogging. In:Proc. AAAI/ICWSM 2010

  21. Passant A, Hastrup T, Bojars U, Breslin J (2008) Micro-blogging: A semantic web and distributed approach. In: Proc. ESWC/ SFSW2008, Tenerife, Spain

  22. Poblete B, Baeza-Yates R (2008) Query-Sets using implicit feedback and query patterns to organize web documents. In: Proc. WWW2008, Beijing, pp. 41–48

  23. Pyshkin E, Kuznetsov A (2010) Approaches for web search user interfaces: how to improve the search quality for various types of information. JoC 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhardt W, Ebner M, Beham G, Costa C (2009) How people are using Twitter during conferences. In: Proc. 5th EduMedia Conference, pp. 145–156. Salzburg, Austria

  25. Signorini A, Segre AM, and Polgreen PM (2011) The use of twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic. In: PLOS ONE, 6(5)

  26. Srivastava J, Cooley R, Deshpande M, Tan P-N (2000) Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data. ACM SIGKDD 1(2):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stumme G, Hotho A, Berendt B (2006) Semantic web mining state of the art and future directions. In: Elsevier Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 4(2): 124–143

  28. Ye Y, Li X, Wu B, Li Y (2011) A comparative study of feature weighting methods for document co-clustering. IJITCC 1(2):206–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou XK, Chen H, Jin Q, Yong JM (2011) Generating associative ripples of relevant information from a variety of data streams by throwing a heuristic stone. In: ACM ICUIMC2011 (5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication), Seoul, Korea

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Yen, N.Y., Jin, Q. et al. Enriching user search experience by mining social streams with heuristic stones and associative ripples. Multimed Tools Appl 63, 129–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1069-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1069-1

Keywords

Navigation