Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Designing educational games through a conceptual model based on rules and scenarios

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of a successful educational game (EG) is a challenging task that requires a lot of knowledge and a variety of skills. EG designers not only have to deal with the inherent technical complexity of game design, but also have to be able to interweave learning activities in a way that is enjoyable and educationally effective at the same time. In order to make available the benefits of game based learning to a wider audience, it is necessary to provide means to alleviate the cost of envisioning new EG by providing tools that might contribute to make the design process easier and quicker. As a first step towards this goal, in this paper we introduce a conceptual model that organizes in a modular way and in different design perspectives the game features. In order to help EG designers, the features that are most often regarded in the literature as significant in producing engaging, fun and educational game experiences, have been included in the model through a set of design entities. Furthermore, the organization of the elements of the model facilitates reusing pieces of the EG designs to quickly produce variants of the same game which can be used to match different learning purposes. The opinions gathered from the educators and game designers that participated of an EG design workshop confirmed that the model can help multidisciplinary EG design teams. Moreover, the model successfully contributed to the process of designing a collection of EGs aimed at raising children ́s awareness of emergencies and domestic risks, whose educational and ludic value was assessed in an experience conducted with students and educators at a primary school in Madrid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amory A, Seagram R (2003) Educational game models: conceptualization and evaluation. S Afr J High Educ 17(2):206–217

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ampatzoglou A, Chatzigeorgiou A (2007) Evaluation of object-oriented design patterns in game development. Inf Softw Technol 49(5):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid S (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell DT, Stanley JC, Gage NL (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Boston

  5. Crookall D (1995) A guide to the literature on simulation/gaming. Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISAGA at a Watershed, 151–177

  6. Csikszentmihalyi M (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass

  7. Desurvire H, Caplan M, Toth JA (2004) Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. Paper presented at the CHI’04 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 1509–1512

  8. Druckman, D. (1995). The educational effectiveness of interactive games. Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISAGA at a Watershed, 178–187

  9. Fabricatore C (2000) Learning and videogames: an unexploited synergy. Paper presented at the The International Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology

  10. Federoff MA (2002) Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games, (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University)

  11. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell JE (2002) Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simul Gaming 33(4):441–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunicke R, LeBlanc M, Zubek R (2004) MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Paper presented at the proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game AI, 04-04

  14. Irwin LG, Johnson J (2005) Interviewing young children: Explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qual Health Res 15(6):821–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsionis G, Virvou M (2008) Personalised E-learning through an educational virtual realitygame using web services. Multimedia Tools Appl 39:47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiili K (2005) Digital game-based learning: towards an experiential gaming model. Internet High Educ 8(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lederman LC (1992) Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gaming 23(2):145–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Leemkuil H (2006) Is it all in the game? Learner support in an educational knowledge management simulation game

  19. Malone TW (1981) What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Pipeline 6(2):50–51, 49

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mehm F, Göbel S, Steinmetz R. Authoring and re-authoring processes for educational adventure games. Paper presented at the 6th European conference on games based learning, 323

  21. OpenSpace. Retrieved November, 2012, from http://www.openspace-engine.com

  22. Peters VAM, Vissers GAN (2004) A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simul Gaming 35(1):70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prensky M (2001) Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital Game-Based Learning. 1–31

  24. Prensky M (2005) Computer games and learning: Digital game-based learning. In: Raessens J, Goldstein J (eds) Handbook of computer game studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  25. Read JC, MacFarlane SJ, Casey C (2002) Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’s fun. Interaction design and children. Eindhoven: Shaker Publishing, Vol. 2, pp 1–23

  26. Rollings A, Morris D (2004) Game architecture and design, a new edition. New Riders Publishing

  27. Shen C, Wang H, Ritterfeld U (2009) Serious games and seriously fun games. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, 48

  28. Smartfox Server. Retrieved November, 2012, from http://www.smartfoxserver.com

  29. Sweetser P, Wyeth P (2005) GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Comput Entertain 3(3)

  30. Torrente J, Del Blanco Á, Cañizal G, Moreno-Ger P, Fernández-Manjón B (2008) < e-Adventure3D>: An open source authoring environment for 3D adventure games in education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 International conference on advances in computer entertainment technology, 191–194

  31. Virvou M, Katsionis G, Manos K (2005) Combining software games with education: evaluation of its educational effectiveness. J Educ Technol Soc 8(2):54–65

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yin RK (2008) Case study research: design and methods Sage Publications, Incorporated

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the project urThey funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (TIN2009-09687).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Telmo Zarraonandia, Paloma Diaz, Ignacio Aedo & Mario Rafael Ruiz

Authors
  1. Telmo Zarraonandia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paloma Diaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ignacio Aedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Rafael Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Telmo Zarraonandia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zarraonandia, T., Diaz, P., Aedo, I. et al. Designing educational games through a conceptual model based on rules and scenarios. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 4535–4559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1821-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1821-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation