Skip to main content
Log in

An image-based seismic damage assessment system

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surveillance systems are commonly used by command centers to monitor and assess seismic damage inside buildings, such as schools, shopping malls, office buildings and skyscrapers. It is expected that checking camera images manually on monitors can be a very time-consuming and inefficient process, especially for a large surveillance system. One of the alternative ways is to first deploy sensors to monitor objects inside buildings, such as tables, cabinets, bookcases and so on, and, after fusing sensor data, to assess damage. However, deploying sensors can be impractical and costly when there are too many objects needed to be monitored. In this paper, we present IDEAS, an image-based disaster damage assessment system, to evaluate seismic damage inside buildings. IDEAS first compares images taken inside a building before and after an earthquake, it then maps the damage to a Mercalli intensity scale. In order to investigate the effectiveness and accuracy of IDEAS, we collect over forty pairs of closed-circuit television (CCTV) images from Youtube website. Each pair of images represents a real scenario of an earthquake inside a building. Our results show that IDEAS performs better than existing methods and can achieve an average accuracy of 97.6 % in mapping Mercalli intensity scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu ET-H (2014) The list of videos. https://sites.google.com/site/edwardchutw/video_links.txt, Accessed 5 March 2015

  2. Conde C, Moctezuma D, MartíN De Diego I, Cabello E (2013) Hogg: Gabor and hog-based human detection for surveillance in non-controlled environments. Neurocomput 100:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalal N, Triggs B, Schmid C (2006) Human detection using oriented histograms of flow and appearance. In: Proceedings of the 9th European conference on computer vision - Volume Part II, ECCV’06, pp 428–441

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ergin T, Erberik MA, Kurc O, Birgonul T, Balta S, Ergen E (2012) Post-disaster sensor-based condition assessment of buildings to develop evacuation strategies. In: The 14th international conference on computing in civil and building engineering (14th ICCCBE)

  5. Gunawan LT, Fitrianie S, Yang Z, Brinkman WP, Neerincx M (2012) Travelthrough: a participatory-based guidance system for traveling through disaster areas. In: CHI ’12 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 241–250

  6. Huang L, Li Z (2010) Feature-based image registration using the shape context. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31(8):2169–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang L, Li Z, Zhang R (2010) Sar and optical images registration using shape context. In: 2010 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), pp 1007–1010

  8. Kuno Y, Watanabe T, Shimosakoda Y, Nakagawa S (1996) Automated detection of human for visual surveillance system.. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on pattern recognition, vol 3, pp 865–869

  9. Liu J, Shih CS, Chu EH (2013) Cyberphysical elements of disaster-prepared smart environments. Computer 46(2):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matlab (2014). http://www.mathworks.com, Accessed 5 March 2015

  12. Naidu V (2014) Multi modal image segmentation. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/28418-multi-modal-image-segmentation, Accessed 5 March 2015

  13. Natural Resources Canada (2014) The Modified Mercalli (MM) Intensity Scale. http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/info-gen/scales-echelles/mercalli-eng.php, Accessed 5 March 2015

  14. OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee (2010) Cap: Common alert protocol, v1.2. http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP-v1.2-os.html, Accessed 5 March 2015

  15. O’Callaghan R, Bull D (2005) Combined morphological-spectral unsupervised image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 14(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soille P (2014a) Morphological image analysis: Principles and applications, pp 170–171

  17. Soille P (2014b) Morphological image analysis: Principles and applications, pp 173–174

  18. van den Boomgaard R, van Balen R (1992) Methods for fast morphological image transforms using bitmapped binary images. CVGIP: Graph Model Image Process 54 (3):252–258

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vural U, Akgul YS (2011) A parallel non-linear surveillance video synopsis system with operator eye-gaze input. In: Weiyao, L (ed) Video Surveillance, InTech, pp 335–357

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wikipedia (2013) Mercalli intensity scale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercalli_intensity_scale, Accessed 5 March 2015

  21. Yonglin S, Lixin W, Zhi W (2010) Identification of inclined buildings from aerial lidar data for disaster management. In: The 18th international conference on geoinformatics, pp 1–5

  22. Youtube (2014) https://www.youtube.com/, Accessed 5 March 2015

  23. Zhang S, Jiang J, Cao S (2012) Relative shape context based on multiscale edge features for disaster remote sensing image registration.. In: The third international conference on intelligent control and information processing (ICICIP), pp 605–609

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by Academia Sinica Project AS-101-TP2-A01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward T.-H. Chu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, E.TH., Wu, CC. An image-based seismic damage assessment system. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 1721–1743 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2602-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2602-9

Keywords

Navigation