Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A reproducible olfactory display for exploring olfaction in immersive media experiences

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olfaction, the sense of smell, is an important perceptual function. It has been shown to enhance the quality of life and to facilitate memory recall. However, despite its importance and potential benefits, olfaction is often neglected when creating immersive media experiences (IMEs). The probable reason is that olfactory displays are not readily available. We have developed a reproducible olfactory display that is simple and affordable to make olfactory displays more available. More importantly, we have conducted three exploratory studies on the effects of olfaction. The results of these studies indicate that olfaction is a nuanced sense that can have both positive and negative effects on user experiences. Hence, further research is needed to better understand and design for olfaction in IMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ademoye OA, Ghinea G (2013) Information recall task impact in olfaction-enhanced multimedia. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 9(3):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bink M, Ingurgio V, James D (2013) Training effectiveness of dismounted infantry simulation. Paper presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC)

  3. Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? IEEE Comput 40(7):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman DA, Kruijff E, LaViola Jr JJ, Poupyrev I (2005) 3D user interfaces: theory and practice. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cann A, Ross DA (1989) Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory. Am J Psychol 102:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Cruz M (1999) Structured evaluation of training in virtual environments. University of Nottingham, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danthiir V, Roberts RD, Pallier G, Stankov L (2001) What the nose knows: olfaction and cognitive abilities. Intelligence 29(4):337–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinh HQ, Walker N, Song C, Kobayashi A, Hodges LF (1999) Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. Paper presented at the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)

  9. Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH, Dermen D (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallace A, Ngo MK, Sulaitis J, Spence C (2012) Multisensory presence in virtual reality: possibilities & limitations. In: Ghinea G, Andres F, Gulliver SR (eds) Multiple sensorial media advances and applications: new developments in MulSeMedia. Information Research Reference, Hershey, pp. 1–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghinea G, Ademoye OA (2010) Perceived synchronization of olfactory multimedia. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 40(4):657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghinea G, Ademoye O (2012a) The sweet smell of success: enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 8(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghinea G, Ademoye O (2012b) User perception of media content association in olfaction-enhanced multimedia. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 8(4):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamblin CJ (2005) Transfer of training from virtual reality environments. Wichita State University, Wichita

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hays RT, Jacobs JW, Prince C, Salas E (1992) Flight simulator training effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Mil Psychol 4(2):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera NS, McMahan RP (2014) Development of a simple and low-cost olfactory display for immersive media experiences. Paper presented at the ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (ImmersiveMe)

  18. Herz RS (1997) The effects of cue distinctiveness on odor-based context-dependent memory. Mem Cogn 25(3):375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herz RS, Engen T (1996) Odor memory: review and analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 3(3):300–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson J (2010) Designing with the mind in mind: simple guide to understanding user interface design guidelines, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones L, Bowers CA, Washburn D, Cortes A, Satya RV (2004) The effect of olfaction on immersion into virtual environments. In: Human performance, situation awareness and automation: issues and considerations for the 21st century. pp 282–285

  22. Kadowaki A, Noguchi D, Sugimoto S, Bannai Y, Okada K (2010) Development of a high-performance olfactory display and measurement of olfactory characteristics for pulse ejections. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT)

  23. Khan K, Pattison T, Sherwood M (2011) Simulation in medical education. Med Teach 33(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lai C, McMahan RP (2015) Virtual reality ladder climbing for mine safety training. Paper presented at the 37th International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry (APCOM), Fairbanks, AK

  25. Lai C, McMahan RP, Hall J (2015) March-and-Reach: a realistic ladder climbing technique. Paper presented at the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI)

  26. Lee AT (2005) Flight simulation: virtual environments in aviation. Ashgate Pub Co, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lucas J, McMahan RP, Engle R, Bowman DA, Thabet W, Schafrik S, Karmis M (2008) Improving mining health and safety through conveyor system training in a virtual environment. Paper presented at the First International Future Mining Conference

  28. Matsukura H, Yoneda T, Ishida H (2013) Smelling screen: development and evaluation of an olfactory display system for presenting a virtual odor source. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(4):606–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McMahan RP, Bowman DA, Schafrik S, Karmis M (2008) Virtual environment training for preshift inspection of haul trucks to improve mining safety. First International Future Mining Conference, In, pp. 167–173

  30. McMahan RP, Schafrik S, Bowman DA, Karmis M (2010) Virtual environments for surface mining powered haulage training. In: Brune J (ed) Extracting the science: a century of mining research. SME, pp. 520–528

  31. Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Constanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER (2001) Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray N, Qiao Y, Lee B, Muntean G-M, Karunakar AK (2013) Age and gender influence on perceived olfactory & visual media synchronization. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)

  33. Murray N, Qiao Y, Lee B, Muntean G-M (2014a) User-profile-based perceived olfactory and visual media synchronization. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 10(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Murray N, Lee B, Qiao Y, Muntean G-M (2014b) Multiple-scent enhanced multimedia synchronization. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 11(1):–12

  35. Nakamoto T, Otaguro S, Kinshita M, Nagahama M, Ohinishi K, Ishida T (2008) Cooking up an interactive olfactory game display. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 28(1):75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nordin S, Brämerson C, Murphy C, Bende M (2003) A Scandinavian adaptation of the multi-clinic smell and taste questionnaire: evaluation of questions about olfaction. Acta Otolaryngol 123(4):536–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pointer SC, Bond NW (1998) Context-dependent memory: colour versus odour. Chem Senses 23(3):359–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Raij AB, Johnsen K, Dickerson RF, Lok BC, Cohen MS, Duerson M, Pauly RR, Stevens AO, Wagner P, Lind DS (2007) Comparing interpersonal interactions with a virtual human to those with a real human. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13(3):443–457

    Google Scholar 

  39. Richard E, Tijou A, Richard P, Ferrier J-L (2006) Multi-modal virtual environments for education with haptic and olfactory feedback. Virtual Reality 10(3–4):207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Kooper R, Opdyke D, Williford JS, North M (1995) Effectiveness of computer generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. Am J Psychiatry 152(4):626–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Santos DV, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM (2004) Hazardous events associated with impaired olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:317–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schab FR (1990) Odors and the remembrance of things past. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16(4):648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schell J, Shochet J (2001) Designing interactive theme park rides. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21(4):11–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Seah SA, Plasencia DM, Bennett PD, Karnik A, Otrocol VS, Knibbe J, Cockburn A, Subramanian S (2014) SensaBubble: a chrono-sensory mid-air display of sight and smell. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in, Computing Systems (CHI)

  45. Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1995) Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans Comp Hum Interact 2(3):201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith DG, Standing L, de Man A (1992) Verbal memory elicited by ambient odor. Percept Mot Skills 74(2):339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spangenberg ER, Crowley AE, Henderson PW (1996) Improving the store environment: do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? J Mark 60(2):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. SurveyOnics (2011) Advertising effectiveness survey. http://www.surveyonics.com/Survey/Advertising-Effectiveness-Survey.aspx.

  49. Tortell R, Luigi DP, Dozois A, Bouchard S, Morie JF, Ilan D (2007) The effects of scent and game play experience on memory of a virtual environment. Virtual Reality 11(1):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tulving E (1985a) Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol 26(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tulving E (1985b) Elements of episodic memory, Oxford Psychology Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  52. van Wyk E, de Villiers R (2009) Virtual reality training applications for the mining industry. Paper presented at the Agrigraph

  53. Velasco C, Balboa D, Marmolejo-Ramos F, Spence C (2014) Crossmodal effect of music and odor pleasantness on olfactory quality perception. Front Psychol 5(1352):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  54. Washburn DA, Jones LM (2004) Could olfactory displays improve data visualization? Comput Sci Eng 6(6):80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yamada T, Yokoyama S, Tanikawa T, Hirota K, Hirose M (2006) Wearable olfactory display: using odor in outdoor environment. Paper presented at the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)

  56. Yanagida Y (2012) A survey of olfactory displays: making and delivering scents. Paper presented at the IEEE Sensors

  57. Yanagida Y, Tomono A (2013) Basics for olfactory display. In: Nakamoto T (ed) Human olfactory displays and interfaces: odor sensing and presentation. Information Research Reference, Hershey, pp. 60–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Yanagida Y, Kawato S, Noma H, Tomono A, Tetsutani N (2004) Projection-based olfactory display with nose tracking. Paper presented at the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)

  59. Zhai S (1998) User performance in relation to 3D input device design. Comput Graph 32(4):50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA

    Michael J. Howell, Nicolas S. Herrera, Alec G. Moore & Ryan P. McMahan

Authors
  1. Michael J. Howell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas S. Herrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alec G. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ryan P. McMahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan P. McMahan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howell, M.J., Herrera, N.S., Moore, A.G. et al. A reproducible olfactory display for exploring olfaction in immersive media experiences. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 12311–12330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2971-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2971-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation