Skip to main content
Log in

Residual domain dictionary learning for compressed sensing video recovery

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For compressed sensing (CS) recovery, the reconstruction quality is highly dependent on the sparsity level of the representation for the signal. Motivated by the observation that the temporal residual image is much sparser than its original image, a temporal residual-domain dictionary learning method for CS video recovery is proposed in this paper. The adaptive basis is learned from inter-frame differences by Karhunen–Loeve transform (KLT) to represent the residuals. And a block-based motion estimation/motion compensation (ME/MC) residual reconstruction strategy is incorporated for the CS video recovery. Experimental results on common test sequences at various sampling rates illustrate that the proposed algorithm gains great improvements over existing approaches. For some video sequences, the proposed method outperforms the state-of-art method near 1 dB in terms of peak signal noise rate (PSNR) at some higher sampling rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A (2006) K-SVD: an algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Sign Proc 54(11):4311–4322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertero M, Boccacci P (1998) Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredies K, Kunisch K, Pock T (2010) Total generalized variation. SIAM J Imag Sci 3(3):492–526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Candes EJ, Romberg J, Tao T (2006) Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun Pure Appl Math 59(8):1207–1223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Candes EJ, Wakin MB (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25(2):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duarte MF, Davenport MA, Takhar D (2008) Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25(24):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eslahi N, Aghagolzadeh A, Andargoli SMH (2015) “Compressive video sensing via dictionary learning and forward prediction.” arXiv, preprint arXiv:1508.07640

  8. Gan L (2007) “Block compressed sensing of natural images”. Proc Int Conf Digit Sign Process, Cardiff, UK 403–406

  9. Goldstein T, Osher S (2009) The split Bregman algorithm for L1 regularized problems. SIAM J Imag Sci 2:323–343

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang LW, Lu CS (2009) “Distributed compressive video sensing,”. Proc Int Conf Acoustics, Speech, Sign Process (ICASSP) 1169–1172, Taipei, Taiwan

  11. Kwon S, Wang J, Shim B (2014) Multipath matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 50(5):2986–3001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y, Li M, Pados DA (2013) Motion-aware decoding of compressed-sensed video. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 23(3):438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Q, Wang SS, Ying LL (2013) Adaptive dictionary learning in sparse gradient domain for image recovery. IEEE Trans Image Proc 22(12):4652–4663

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mun S, Fowler JE (2011) “Residual reconstruction for block-based compressed sensing of video”. Proc Data Compress Conf 183–192, Snowbird, UT

  15. Ophir B, Lustig M, Elad M (2011) Multi-scale dictionary learning using wavelets. IEEE J Sel Topics Sign Process 5(5):1014–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ravishankar S, Bresler Y (2011) MR image reconstruction from highly undersampled k-space data bydictionary learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(5):1028–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stankovic V, Stankovic L, Cheng S (2008) “Compressive video sampling,”. Proc Eur Signal Proc Conf (EUSIPCO)

  18. Wakin MB, Laska JN, Duarte MF (2006) “Compressive imaging for video representation and coding”. Proc Picture Coding Symp (PCS) 711–716

  19. Yue H, Ongie G, Ramani S, Jacob M (2013) Generalized higher degree total variation (HDTV) regularization. IEEE Trans Image Proc 23(6):2423–2435

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Zhao C, Zhao D, Gao W (2014) Image compressive sensing recovery using adaptively learned sparsifying basis via L0 minimization. Signal Process 103:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao YB (2013) RSP-based analysis for sparsest and least ℓ1-norm solutions to underdetermined linear systems. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 61(22):5777–5788

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Hunan Province Science and Technology Planning Project (nos. 2014FJ6047 and 2014GK3030), the Science Research Key Project of the Education Department of Hunan Province (nos. 13A107 and 15A007), and the Changsha Science and Technology Planning Project (no. K1403028-11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaobo Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Yang, G., Xie, H. et al. Residual domain dictionary learning for compressed sensing video recovery. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 10083–10096 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3599-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3599-4

Keywords

Navigation