Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Packet loss rate mapped to the quality of experience

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the influence of packet loss on the users’ quality of experience QoE and establish the Mapping model of the two when the video transmit in the network, building a NS2 + MyEvalvid simulation platform, by the method of modifying QoS parameters to simulate different degrees of packet loss, focus on the influence of packet loss on QoE and establish the mapping model between them. Experimental results show that, packet loss has a significant influence on Quality of experience. Packet loss rate and the Quality of experience presents a nonlinear relationship, and use Matlab to establish the mapping model, this model’s accuracy is high, easy to operate, can real-time detect packet loss has influence on the user’s quality of experience (QoE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen N, Jiang X, Wang C, Jia S (2011) Study on relationship between network video packet loss and video quality [C]. Int Cong Image Sign Proc 1:282–286

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huayong Liu, Lingyun Pan, Wenting Meng (2012) Key Frame Extraction from Online Video Based on Improved Frame Difference Optimization[A]. Proceedings of 2012 I.E. 14th International Conference on Communication Technology[C]

  3. Hyun Jong Kim, Seong Gon Choi (2010) A study on a QoS/QoE correlation model for QoE evaluation on IPTV service [C] // proceedings of the12th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)

  4. Jasna Zei, Mesud Hadiali, Adisa Haskovi (2012) An approach to estimate correlation between QoS and perceptual video quality in packet-switched networks[C]. MIPRO, 2012 Proceedings of the 35th International Convention. IEEE, 573–578

  5. Ke CH, Shieh CK, Hwang WS et al (2008) An evaluation framework for more realistic simulations of MPEG video transmission [J]. J Inf Sci Eng 24(2):425–440

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SH, Kim DI (2015) Performance tradeoff in two-zone based wireless powered communication networks [C] //2015 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS). IEEE, 286–290

  7. Kim HJ, Park KH, Lee JS, et al (2011) Keeping Stability of Boiled-dried Anchovy Coated with an Invisible Edible Collagen Peptides Film During Storage[C]//2011 International symposium and annual meeting. 287–287

  8. Kim HJ, Park KH, Lee JS, et al (2011) Keeping Stability of Boiled-dried Anchovy Coated with an Invisible Edible Collagen Peptides Film During Storage [C] //2011 International symposium and annual meeting, 287–287

  9. Kühnel C, Scholz, K, Heute U (2008) Dimension-based Speech-Quality Assessment: Development of an Estimator of the Dimension‘Noisiness’ [C] //Voice Communication (SprachKommunikation), ITG Conference on. VDE, 2008: 1–4

  10. Lin TL, Kanumuri S, Zhi Y et al (2010) A versatile model for packet loss visibility and its application to packet prioritization [J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(3):722–735

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikoaj Leszczuk, Lucjan Janowski, Piotr Romaniak, Zdzisaw Papir (2011) Assessing quality of experience in high definition video streaming under diverse packet loss patterns [SD]. Image Communication, 137–143

  12. Ni Chen, Xiuhua Jiang, Caihong Wang (2010) Impact of Packet Loss on the Perceived IPTV Video Quality [C]. CISP, 206–209

  13. Qin Dai, Ralf Lehnert (2010) Impact of Packet Loss on the Perceived Video Quality [C]. International Conference on Evolving Internet, 206–209

  14. Raake A, Schoenenberg K, Skowronek J, et al (2013) Predicting speech quality based on interactivity and delay [C] //INTERSPEECH, 1384–1388

  15. Ramjee R, Kurose J, Towsley D, et al (1994) Adaptive playout mechanisms for packetized audio applications in wide-area networks [C] //INFOCOM’94. Networking for Global Communications., 13th Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, 680–688

  16. Roccetti M, Ghini V, Pau G et al (2001) Design and experimental evaluation of an adaptive playout delay control mechanism for packetized audio for use over the internet [J]. Multimed Tools Appl 14(1):23–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sajad Khorsandroo, Rafidah Md Noor,Sayid Khorsandroo (2010) A Generic Quantitative Relationship between Quality of Experience and Packet Loss in Video Streaming [C], 24(2):36–41

  18. Stalins N, Moens S, Van den Broeck W, Marien I, Vermeulen B, Lambert P, Van de Walle R, Demeester P (2010) Assessing quality of experience of IPTV and video on demand services in real-life environments. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

  19. Sullivan GJ, Ohm JR, Han WJ et al (2012) Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard[J]. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 22(12):1649–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tao S, Apostolopoulos J, Guérin R (2008) Real-time monitoring of video quality in IP networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on networking 16(5):1052–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Volk M, una J, Kos A, et al (2008) IPTV systems, standards and architectures: Part II-quality-assured provisioning of IPTV services within the NGN environment. IEEE Communications Magazine

  22. Wang Z, Bovik AC (2009) Mean squared error: love it or leave it? a new look at signal fidelity measures [J]. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(1):98–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xian-Gong W (2013) Research on multimedia data stream in network [C] //Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications, 2013 Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 498–502

  24. Xin-Gong W (2013) Research on multimedia data stream in network[C]//intelligent systems design and engineering applications, fourth international conference on. IEEE 2013:498–502

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu CY, Ke CH, Chen RS et al (2008) MyEvalvid_RTP: a evaluation framework for more realistic simulations of multimedia transmissions[J]. Int J Soft Eng Appl 2(2):21–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 60963011, 61162009), the Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 2009GZS0022), and the Special Research Foundation of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (No: Z9901501, 20133007), Beijing University of Technology and software institute Doctoral scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Software Engineering, Department of Information, Beijing University of Technology, Software College Building, Ping Park No. 100, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, People’s Republic of China

    Jin Wang & Yi bin Hou

Authors
  1. Jin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi bin Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(AVI 17836 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., bin Hou, Y. Packet loss rate mapped to the quality of experience. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 387–422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4254-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4254-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation