Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary computing enriched ridge regression model for craniofacial reconstruction

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Craniofacial reconstruction is one of the dominating research domains having vital significance towards forensic purposes as well as archaeological investigation needs. With a goal to enable an error-resilient and swift craniofacial reconstruction model, in this paper an evolutionary computing assisted enhanced regression model has been proposed. We have developed an enhanced over-fitting resilient regression model called Ridge Regression (RR) as a statistical method to perform craniofacial reconstruction using landmark points and skull-face/(tissue) skin features. Our proposed model incorporates a hybrid evolutionary computing scheme containing Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Differential Evolution (DE) to perform feature point selection and landmark count reduction. Here, the prime objective is to reduce the feature sets and landmark that can eventually make craniofacial reduction process more time efficient and accurate. The performance assessment reveals that the proposed PSO-DEFS based RRM model outperforms existing approaches such as the least square support vector regression (LSSVR) and partial least square regression (PLSR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berar M, Desvignes M, Bailly G, Panyan Y (2005) 3d statistical facial reconstruction. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. pp 365–370

  2. Berar M, Tilotta FM, Glaunes JA, Rozenholc Y (2011) Craniofacial reconstruction as a prediction problem using a latent root regression model. Forensic Sci Int 210(1–3):228–236

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claes P (2007) A robust statistical surface registration framework using implicit function representations: application in craniofacial reconstruction. In Faculteitingenieurswetenschappen, department Elektrotechniek, afdeling PSI, K.U. Leuven, Leuven

  4. Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Suetens P (2006) Statistically deformable face models for cranio-facial reconstruction. J Comput Inf Technol 14(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Suetens P (2006) Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue-depths: methodology and validation. Forensic Sci Int 159(1):147–158

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Clement JG et al (2010) Computerized craniofacial reconstruction: conceptual framework and review. Forensic Sci Int 201(1):138–145

    Google Scholar 

  7. Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Clement JG, Suetens P (2010) Bayesian estimation of optimal craniofacial reconstructions. Forensic Sci Int 201:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Greef S, Claes P, Mollemans W, Loubele M, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Willems G (2005) Semi-automated ultrasound facial soft tissue depth registration: method and validation. J Forensic Sci 50(6):JFS2004547–7

  9. Deng Q, Zhou M, Shui W, Wu Z, Ji Y, Bai R (2011) A novel skull registration based on global and local deformations for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int 208:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duan S, Yang D, Huang Y, Hu ZW (2014) Craniofacial reconstruction based on multilinear subspace analysis. Multimedia Tools Appl 73(2):809–823

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoerl A, Kennard R (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Am Stat Assoc 12(1):55–67

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Zhou M, Wu Z (2009) An automatic dense point registration method for 3d face animation. In: Image and Signal Processing, 2009. CISP'09. 2nd International Congress on IEEE. 2009, pp 1–6

  13. Huang D, Duan F, Deng Q, Wu Z, Zhou M (2011) Face reconstruction from skull based on partial least squares regression. In: Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), 2011 SeventhInternational Conference on IEEE. 2011, pp 1118–1121

  14. Li Y, Chang L, Qiao X, Liu R, Duan F (2014) Craniofacial reconstruction based on least square support vector regression. SMC pp 1147–1151

  15. Lorensen WE, Harvey EC (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM Siggraph Comput Graph 21(4):163–169

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paysan P, Luthi M, Albrecht T, Lerch A, Amberg B, et al. (2009) Face reconstruction from skull shapes and physical attributes. Pattern Recognition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 232–241

  17. Roozbeh M (2016) Robust ridge estimator in restricted semiparametric regression models. J Multivar Anal 147:127–144

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilotta F, Richard F, Glaunes JA, Berar M, Gey S, Verdeille S, Rozenholc Y, Gaudy JF (2009) Construction and analysis of a head CT-scan database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int 191(1):112–e1

  19. Turner WD, Brown RE, Kelliher TP, Tu PH, Taister MA, KWP M (2005) A novel method of automated skull registration for forensic facial approximation. Forensic Sci Int 154:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vigneau E, Qannari M (2002) A new algorithm for latent root regression analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 41:231–242

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkinson C (2004) Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romany F. Mansour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansour, R.F. Evolutionary computing enriched ridge regression model for craniofacial reconstruction. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 22065–22082 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5015-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5015-0

Keywords

Navigation