Skip to main content
Log in

An improved ridge regression algorithm and its application in predicting TV ratings

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ridge regression is a biased estimated regressive method, which is traditionally used in collinearity data analysis. It is actually a modified Least Square method, which gains more rational and reliable regression coefficient by giving up the unbiasedness of Least Squares Estimation, reducing partial information and decreasing accuracy to overcome the over-fitting problems. This article presents an improved ridge regression algorithm and utilizes it to predict the audience rating for TV ratings. It is tested by 10 - fold Cross Validation. TV rating is an important indication to measure the quality and user experience, as well as one of the vital standards to state the value of a TV channel. The improved ridge regression algorithm is used to learn the model of weight matrix, which is trained by the error algorithm to predict the TV ratings. The extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akata Z, Perronnin F, Harchaoui Z, Schmid C (2016) Label-embedding for image classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(7):1425–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Q, Xue H (2011) Modified P_SVM audience prediction and its application. Xi'an Technological University Newspaper 31(6):535–542

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen M, Ding G, Zhao S, Chen H, Han J, Liu Q (2017) Reference based LSTM for image captioning. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 3981–3987

  4. Ding G, Guo Y, Zhou J, Gao Y (2016) Large-scale cross-modality search via collective matrix factorization hashing. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(11):5427–5440

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao Y, Wee C-Y, Kim M, Giannakopoulos P, Montandon M-L, Haller S, Shen D (2015) MCI identification by joint learning on multiple MRI data. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2:78–85

  6. Gao Y, Zhao S, Yang Y, Chua T-S (2015) Multimedia social event detection in microblog. In: International Conference on Multimedia Modelling (1):269–281

  7. Gu Y, Liu T, Jia X, Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J (2016) Nonlinear multiple kernel learning with multiple-structure-element extended morphological profiles for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(6):3235–3247

  8. He X (2005) Multivariate linear model and ridge regression analysis. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, pp 16–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu H, Wen Y, Niyato D (2017) Public cloud storage-assisted mobile social video sharing: a supermodular game approach. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 35(3):545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu H, Wen Y, Niyato D (2017) Spectrum allocation and bitrate adjustment for mobile social video sharing: potential game with online QoS learning approach. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 35(4):935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Luo D, Liu S (2010) Neighborhood of Kernel ridge regression to keep biggest interval of face identification. Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 23(1):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luo L, Yang J, Qian J, Tai Y, Lu G-F (2017) Robust image regression based on the extended matrix variate power exponential distribution of dependent noise. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(9):2168–2182

  13. Maggiori E, Tarabalka Y, Charpiat G, Alliez P (2017) Convolutional neural networks for large-scale remote-sensing image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(2):645–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie W, Liu A, Yuting S (2016) Cross-domain semantic transfer from large-scale social media. Multimedia Systems 22(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu L, Zhouqing Q (2011) Audience prediction based on BP neural network. Communication University of China Newspaper Natural Science Edition 18(3):59–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao Q, Yang X (2015) Prediction of audience rating based on Nolinear Auto-Regressive (NAR) model. Video Engineering 4:024

  17. Xing Y, Shi G (2005) Audience rating prediction under big data situation. Jiangsu Social Science 3:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Xiang K, Long R, Ma L (2016) Unmodeled dynamic compensation and control based on ESN nonlinear system. Acta Electron Sin 44(1):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao S, Gao Y, Jiang X, Yao H, Chua T-S, Sun X (2014) Exploring Principles-of-Art Features for Image Emotion Recognition. In: ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 47–56

  20. Zhao S, Yao H, Gao Y, Ding G, Chua T-S (2016) Predicting personalized image emotion perceptions in social networks. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2628787

  21. Zhao S, Yao H, Gao Y, Ji R, Ding G (2017) Continuous probability distribution prediction of image emotions via multitask shared sparse regression. IEEE Trans Multimedia 19(3):632–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61672178, 61601458, 61701273 and 91420202) and the Project Funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017 M610897). The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sicheng Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, N., Zhao, S., Sun, Z. et al. An improved ridge regression algorithm and its application in predicting TV ratings. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 525–536 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5250-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5250-4

Keywords

Navigation