Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-structural edge networking paradigm: an analysis study in terms of multimedia content delivery

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To eliminate the phenomenon of the digital divide in the area lacking Internet infrastructure support and accomplish the vision of “The Internet is for everyone” envisaged by Vint Cerf, our group pioneered a dual-structural edge networking paradigm, being utilized to construct a DSN (dual-structural network) for multimedia content delivery. The aim of this paper is to study multimedia content delivery capability for the edge networking paradigm. First of all, for further understanding the delivery capability, we formalize DSN in terms of network architecture and logical entity interaction and propose a hierarchical model and triple B model sequentially. Then, we propose a multi-dimension analysis methodology of multimedia content delivery for networking paradigm from a high-level perspective, in which network performance and user evaluation are taken into account. Further, according to the methodology, we design a specific comparative analysis model of multimedia content delivery capability for DSN, consisting of sub-model based on transmission performance and sub-model based on user utility. Lastly, we conduct direct and indirect comparative analysis studies by utilizing the model, and numerical results shed light on that DSN outperforms TCP/IP, NDN (named data networking) and BSN (broadcast-storage network) in terms of the delivery capability. Given this, we conclude that DSN is a more promising paradigm for multimedia content delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Free basics (2016) https://info.internet.org

  2. LeoSat (2017) http://leosat.com

  3. Loon (2017) https://www.solveforx.com/loon

  4. Oneweb (2017) http://oneweb.world

  5. SpaceX (2018) http://www.spacex.com

  6. Ahmed SH, Bouk SH, Dongkyun K, Rawat DB, Song H (2017) Named data networking for software defined vehicular networks. IEEE Commun Mag 55(8):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alvarez J, Walls B (2016) Constellations, clusters, and communication technology: expanding small satellite access to space. In: Aerospace Conference, 2016 IEEE, pp 1–11

  8. Cui J, Zhang J, Zhong H, Yan X (2017) Spacf: a secure privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vanet with cuckoo filter. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66 (11):10283–10295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dovrolis C, Streelman JT (2010) Evolvable network architectures What can we learn from biology? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 40(2):72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldmann A (2007) Internet clean-slate design: what and why? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37(3):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garlan D, Schmerl B (2009) ÆVol: a tool for defining and planning architecture evolution. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software engineering, pp 591–594

  12. Gill P, Schapira M, Goldberg S (2011) Let the market drive deployment: a strategy for transitioning to bgp security. In: ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol 41, pp 14–25

  13. Hao P, Liang H, Zhao K, Jiang J, Li T, Che X (2018) Dynamic pricing with traffic engineering for adaptive video streaming over software-defined content delivery networking. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-018-6111-5

  14. Li Y, Yang P (2013) New mechanism for sharing cultural big data. Communications of the CCF 5(5):36–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin S, Wu J, Xu K (2010) Analysis and evaluation of internet resource distribution models. Journal of Tsinghua University Science and Technology 50(1):58–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Li Z, Yang P, Dong Y (2017) Information-centric mobile ad hoc networks and content routing: a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 58:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Yang P, Dong Y (2018) Research on content sharing capability for dual-architecture network. Acta Electronica Sinica 46(4):849–855

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martel Consulting Martin Potts (2017) Architecture for an internet for everybody. https://rife-project.eu

  19. Mertz J, Nunes I (2017) Understanding application-level caching in web applications: a comprehensive introduction and survey of state-of-the-art approaches. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50(6):98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rexford J, Dovrolis C (2010) Future internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research. Commun ACM 53(9):36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rui L, Yang S, Huang H (2018) A producer mobility support scheme for real-time multimedia delivery in named data networking. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77 (2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trossen D, Sathiaseelan A, Ott J (2016) Towards an information centric network architecture for universal internet access. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 46(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang E, Li Y (2011) Study on internet information broadcast-storage system based on scale-free network. Acta Electronica Sinica 4:737–741

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xing L, Ma J, Liu Z, Li Y (2008) Information communion architecture in mobile communication. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology 8:737–740

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu K, Lin S, Wu J (2013) A three-network convergence evolution model and analysis based on user utility. Chinese Journal of Computers 36(5):903–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu K, Zhu M, Wang N, Lin S, Wang H, Tong L (2013) The 2act model-based evaluation for in-network caching mechanism. In: IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC), pp 000636–000641

  27. Yang P, Li Y (2015) General architecture model of broadcast-storage network and its realization patterns. Acta Electronica Sinica 43(5):974–979

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang P, Li Y (2015) Secondary structure of future internet based on broadcast-storage concept. Complex Systems and Complexity Science 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yin H, Guo D, Yongqiang L, Yang P, Zhao Z, Zhang Z (2018) Dual-structural network of active defence. Scientia Sinica Informationis. http://engine.scichina.com/publisher/scp/journal/SSI/doi/10.1360/N112017-00171

  30. Young BMDY (2015) Hype cycle for networking and communications. Technical report, Gartner, Inc

  31. Youping L (2000) Information sunshine: the collisionless information sharing architecture. Engineering Science 1:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  32. Youping L (2002) The secondary web of knowledge embodiment. Engineering Science 8:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Youping L (2006) Research of complementary architecture network. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology (Natural Science edition 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Youping L (2015) Third way for future network. Telecommunications Science 12:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zaitsev DA, Shmeleva TR (2009) Parametric petri net model for ethernet performance and qos evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 16th German workshop on algorithms and tools for petri nets (AWPN2009), Karlsruhe, Germany, vol 501, pp 15–28

  36. Zhang G, Lin S, Liu Z, Lin T, Zhang G, Li Y (2012) Energy efficient data transmission on the internet. Journal on Communications 33(5):158–168

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu M, Xu K, Lin S (2013) The evaluation method towards the application adaptability of internet architecture. Chinese Journal of Computers 36(9):1785–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Youping Li and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61472080 and No. 61672155, Academician Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering under Grant No. 2018-XY-07, National High Technology Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2013AA013503, Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2018 and National Research Foundation of Korea under Grant No. 2017R1C1B5017629.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Yang, P., Dong, Y. et al. Dual-structural edge networking paradigm: an analysis study in terms of multimedia content delivery. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 24555–24572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6649-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6649-2

Keywords

Navigation