Skip to main content
Log in

A case study of a two-stage image segmentation algorithm

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mumford-Shah (MS) model has attracted considerable research interests in the past decades. It is a classical and important approach for image segmentation. In a recent work, as an extension to MS model, Cai et al. proposed a two-stage image segmentation method. In the first stage of this method, a convex variant of MS model is developed. Then, after finding the unique minimizer of this new model, in the second stage, image segmentation is conducted by automatically thresholding. Compared with MS model, the new model is convex and computationally efficient. In this paper, as a further study, the theoretical aspect of Cai et al.’s method is emphasized and some primary results are obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams RA, Fournier J (2003) Sobolev Spaces, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdin B, Chambolle A (2000) Implementation of an adaptive finite-element approximation of the Mumford-Shah functional. Numer Math 85(4):609–646

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown ES, Chan TF, Bresson X (2010) A convex relaxation method for a class of vector-valued minimization problems with applications to Mumford-Shah segmentation. Ucla cam report

  4. Cai X, Chan R, Zeng T (2013) A two-stage image segmentation method using a convex variant of the Mumford-Shah model and thresholding. SIAM J Imaging Sci 6 (1):368–390

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambolle A (1995) Image segmentation by variational methods: Mumford and Shah functional and the discrete approximations. SIAM J Appl Math 55(3):827–863

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chambolle A, Maso GD (1999) Discrete approximation of the Mumford-Shah functional in dimension two. ESAIM: Math Modell Numer Anal 33(04):651–672

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan TF, Vese LA (2000) An efficient variational multiphase motion for the Mumford-Shah segmentation model. In: Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol 1, pp 490–494

  8. Chan TF, Vese LA (2000) Image segmentation using level sets and the piecewise-constant Mumford-Shah model. Ucla cam report

  9. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Image Process 10(2):266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) A level set algorithm for minimizing the M,umford-Shah functional in image processing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision, pp 161–168

  11. Chan R, Yang H, Zeng T (2014) A two-stage image segmentation method for blurry images with poisson or multiplicative gamma noise. SIAM J Imaging Sci 7 (1):98–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dacorogna B (2008) Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, 2nd edn. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein T, Osher S (2009) The split bregman method for l1-regularized problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2(2):323–343

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y, Lu D, Zeng T (2013) Two-step approach for the restoration of images corrupted by multiplicative noise. SIAM J Sci Comput 35(6):A2856–A2873

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung M, Bresson X, Chan TF, Vese LA (2011) Nonlocal MUmford-Shah regularizers for color image restoration. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(6):1583–1598

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lie J, Lysaker M, Tai X (2006) A binary level set model and some applications to Mumford-Shah image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(5):1171–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mumford D, Shah J (1989) Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun Pur Appl Math 42(5):577–685

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pock T, Cremers D, Bischof H, Chambolle A (2009) An algorithm for minimizing the M,umford-Shah functional. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICCV, pp 1133–1140

  19. Tsai A, Yezzi JA, Willsky AS (2001) Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(8):1169–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vese LA, Chan TF (2002) A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. Int J Comput Vis 50(3):271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61572052 and U1736213) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017RC008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolong Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Li, W. A case study of a two-stage image segmentation algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 8197–8206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6778-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6778-7

Keywords

Navigation