Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A blind spatial domain-based image watermarking using texture analysis and association rules mining

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In aims to ensure images authentication, this paper proposes a blind spatial domain-based image watermarking using texture analysis and association rules mining. The idea is to identify the strongly textured locations in the host image for inserting the watermark. Indeed, texture is correlated with the Human Visual System (HVS). It can therefore be helpful in designing a watermarking approach to enhance the imperceptibility and the robustness. Here a solution is proposed in which four gray-scale histogram based-image features (DC, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy) are chosen as input data for designing association rules. Subsequently, the Apriori algorithm is applied to mine the relationships between the selected features. The higher significant relationships between the selected features are used to identify the strongly textured blocks for watermark embedding. Two strong parameters (lift and confidence) computed using association rules mining were used to design a means of blind watermarking. The experimental results show that interesting ratios of imperceptibility, robustness and embedding rate with low execution time can be obtained by this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdelhakim A, Saleh H, Nassar A (2017) A quality guaranteed robust image watermarking optimization with artificial bee Colony. Expert Syst Appl 72:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal C, Han J (2014) Frequent pattern mining. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami A (1993) Database mining: a performance perspective. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 5(6):914–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Messaoud R, Boussaid O, Rabaseda S (2006) Mining association rules in OLAP cubes. IEEE Conf Innov Inform Technol::1–5

  5. Bouslimi D, Coatrieux G, Cozic M, Roux C (2012) A joint encryption/watermarking system for verifying the reliability of medical images. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(5):891–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox I, Miller M, Bloom J (2000) Watermarking applications and their properties. Proc Int Conf Inform Technol: Coding Comput-ITCC::6–10

  7. Das A (2015) Guide to signals and patterns in image processing: foundations, methods and applications. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Das C, Panigrahi S, Sharma V, Mahapatra K (2014) A novel blind robust image watermarking in DCT domain using inter-block coefficient correlation. AEU-Int J Electron Commun 68(3):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Djenouri Y, Comuzzi M (2017) Combining Apriori heuristic and bio-inspired algorithms for solving the frequent itemsets mining problem. Inf Sci 420:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubey K, Mushrif M, Mitra K (2016) Segmentation of brain MR images using rough set based intuitionistic fuzzy clustering. Biocybernet Biomed Eng 36(2):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Findik O, Babaoğlu İ, Ülker E (2011) Implementation of BCH coding on artificial neural network-based color image watermarking. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 7(8):4905–4914

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghadi M, Laouamer L, Moulahi T (2016) Securing data exchange in wireless multimedia sensor networks: perspectives and challenges. Multimed Tools Appl 75(6):3425–3451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghadi M, Laouamer L, Nana L, Pascu A (2016) A novel zero-watermarking approach of medical images based on Jacobian matrix model. Sec Comm Netw 9(18):5203–5218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghadi M, Laouamer L, Nana L, Pascu A (2016) A robust associative watermarking technique based on frequent pattern mining and texture analysis. Proc 8th Int ACM Conf Manag Comput Collect Intell Digit Ecosyst ACM:73–81

  15. Ghadi M, Laouamer L, Nana L, Pascu A (2017) A robust watermarking technique in spatial domain using closeness coefficients of texture. Proc 8th Int Conf Inform Intell Syst Appl:1–6

  16. Haddada L, Dorizzi B, Ben-Amara N (2017) A combined watermarking approach for securing biometric data. Signal Process Image Commun 55:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahsler M, Chellubonia S (2015) Visualizing association rules: introduction to the R-extension package a rules Viz. Project module. Technical report, Southern Methodist University

  18. Han J, Zhao X, Qiu C (2016) A digital image watermarking method based on host image analysis and genetic algorithm. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 7:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu L-Y, Hu H-T (2015) Blind image watermarking via exploitation of inter-block prediction and visibility threshold in DCT domain. J Vis Commun Image Represent 32:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu L-Y, Hu H-T (2017) Robust blind image watermarking using crisscross inter-block prediction in the DCT domain. J Vis Commun Image R 46:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu H-T, Hsu L-Y (2016) A mixed modulation scheme for blind image watermarking. Int J Electron Commun (AEÜ) 70:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jovanoski V, Lavra N (2001) Classification rule learning with APRIORI-C. in proceedings of 10th Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence knowledge extraction, Multi-agent Systems, Logic Programming, and Constraint Solving, Springer 2258:44–51

  23. Kalra G, Talwar R, Sadawarti H (2015) Adaptive digital image watermarking for color images in frequency domain. Multimed Tools Appl 74(17):6849–6869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khalili M (2015) DCT-Arnold chaotic based watermarking using JPEG-YCbCr. Optik-Int J Light Electron Optics 126:4367–4371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Korn F, Labrinidis A, Kotidis Y, Faloutsos C (1998) Ratio rules: a new paradigm for fast, quantifiable data mining. Proc 24th VLDB Conf New York, USA

  26. Kumar S, Jaina N, Fernandes S (2017) Rough set based effective technique of image watermarking. J Comput Sci 19:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maggi F, Ciccio C, Francescomarino C, Kala T (2018) Parallel algorithms for the automated discovery of declarative process models. Inf Syst 74(2):136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Materka A, Strzelecki M (1998) Texture analysis methods-a review. Technical university of Lodz, institute of electronics, COST B11 Report, Brussels: 9–11

  29. Moosazadeh M, Ekbatanifard G (2017) An improved robust image watermarking method using DCT and YCoCg-R color space. Optik 140:975–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nikolaidis A, Pitas I (2003) Asymptotically optimal detection for additive watermarking in the DCT and DWT domains. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(5):363–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parah S, Sheikh J, Loan N, Bhat G (2016) Robust and blind watermarking technique in DCT domain using inter-block coefficient differencing. Digit Sign Process 53:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Petitcolas F, Anderson R, Kuhn M (1998) Attacks on copyright marking systems. Proceedings of 2nd workshop on information hiding. Lecture Notes Comput Sci Springer 1525:218–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sirkaya-Turk E, Uysal M, Hammit W, Vaske J (2011) Research methods for leisure, recreation, and tourism. Prentice Hall, United States

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Su Q, Chen B (2017) Robust color image watermarking technique in the spatial domain. Soft Comput:1–16

  35. Sudhir R (2015) A survey on image mining techniques: theory and applications. Int J Comput Eng Intell Syst 2(6):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2006) Introduction to data mining. Pearson Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  37. Taniar D (2008) Data mining and knowledge discovery technologies. IGI Global, USA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Thanki R, Borra S, Dwivedi V, Borisagar K (2017) An efficient medical image watermarking scheme based on FDCuT–DCT. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20:1366–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Umbaugh S (2011) Digital image processing and analysis: human and computer vision applications with CIVP tools. J Electron Imag 20(3):335–399

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Liu C (2017) A novel and effective image encryption algorithm based on chaos and DNA encoding. Multimed Tools Appl 76(5):6229–6245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Y, Pearmain A (2004) Blind image data hiding based on self reference. Pattern Recog Lett 25:1681–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H (2005) Structural similarity based image quality assessment. Digital video image quality and perceptual coding (signal processing and communications) book. CRC Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yamac M, Dikici Ç, Sankur B (2016) Hiding data in compressive sensed measurements: a conditionally reversible data hiding scheme for compressively sensed measurements. Digit Sign Process 48:188–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang H, Yin J (2013) A secure removable visible watermarking for BTC compressed images. Multimed Tools Appl 74(6):1725–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zaidan B, Zaidan A, Abdul-Karim H, Ahmad N (2016) A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi-criteria analysis based on large-scale data. Software: practice and experience. Softw Pract Exper 47(10):1365–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zebbiche K, Khelifi F, Loukhaoukha K (2018) Robust additive watermarking in the DTCWT domain based on perceptual masking. Multimed Tools Appl 77(16):21281–21304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Jiang J, Zha Y, Zhang H, Zhao S (2013) Research on embedding capacity and efficiency of information hiding based on digital images. Int J Intell Sci 3:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lab-STICC, Université de Brest, CNRS, Université Bretagne Loire, CS 93837, 6 avenue Le Gorgeu, 29238, Brest, Cedex 3, France

    Musab Ghadi, Lamri Laouamer, Laurent Nana & Anca Pascu

Authors
  1. Musab Ghadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lamri Laouamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laurent Nana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anca Pascu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musab Ghadi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghadi, M., Laouamer, L., Nana, L. et al. A blind spatial domain-based image watermarking using texture analysis and association rules mining. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 15705–15750 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6851-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6851-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation