Skip to main content
Log in

Hyperspectral image classification via compact-dictionary-based sparse representation

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a compact-dictionary-based sparse representation (CDSR) method is proposed for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. The proposed dictionary in CDSR is dynamically generated according to the spatial and spectral context of each pixel. It can effectively shrink the decision range for classification, and reduce the computational burden since the compact dictionary is composed of the classes correlated with the target pixel in terms of spatial location and spectral information. In order to obtain better spatial context information, a spatial location expanding strategy is designed for spreading local explicit label information to a wider region. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method when compared with some widely used HSI classification approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bioucas-Dias JM, Plaza A, Camps-Valls G, Scheunders P (2013) Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 1 (2):6–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Camps-Valls G, Gomez-Chova L, Munoz-Mari J, Vila-Frances J, Calpe-Maravilla J (2006) Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camps-Valls G, Tuia D, Bruzzone L, Benediktsson JA (2014) Advances in hyperspectral image classification: earth monitoring with statistical learning methods. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y, Nasrabadi NM, Tran TD (2011) Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49 (10):3973–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Lin Z, Zhao X, Wang G, Gu Y (2014) Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 7(6):2094–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Chen N, Peng J (2016) Nearest regularized joint sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 13(3):424–428

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng G, Li Z, Han J, Yao X, Guo L (2018) Exploring hierarchical convolutional features for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens pp(99):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Du Q, Zhang L, Zhang B, Tong X, Du P, Chanussot J (2013) Foreword to the special issue on hyperspectral remote sensing: theory, methods, and applications. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 6(2):459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elhamifar E, Vidal R (2009) Sparse subspace clustering. IEEE Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 35:2790–2797

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fang L, Li S, Kang X, Benediktsson JA (2014) Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification via multiscale adaptive sparse representation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(12):7738–7749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu W, Li S, Fang L, Kang X, Benediktsson JA (2016) Hyperspectral image classification via shape-adaptive joint sparse representation. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 9(2):556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao Y, Ji R, Cui P, Dai Q (2014) Hyperspectral image classification through bilayer graph-based learning. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(7):2769–2778

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gevaert CM, Suomalainen J, Tang J, Kooistra L (2015) Generation of spectral temporal response surfaces by combining multispectral satellite and hyperspectral uav imagery for precision agriculture applications. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 8(6):3140–3146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghamisi P, Plaza J, Chen Y, Li J, Plaza A (2017) Advanced spectral classifiers for hyperspectral images: a review. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 5(1):8–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han Y, Wu F, Tao D, Shao J, Zhuang Y, Jiang J (2012) Sparse unsupervised dimensionality reduction for multiple view data. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 22(10):1485–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han Y, Wu F, Tian Q, Zhuang Y (2012) Image annotation by input-output structural grouping sparsity. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(6):3066–3079

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Han Y, Yang Y, Yan Y, Ma Z, Sebe N, Zhou X (2015) Semisupervised feature selection via spline regression for video semantic recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(2):252–264

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jia S, Deng B, Zhu J, Jia X, Li Q (2017) Superpixel-based multitask learning framework for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(5):2575–2588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiao H, Zhong Y, Zhang L (2012) Artificial DNA computing-based spectral encoding and matching algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50(10):4085–4104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lampropoulos GA, Liu T, Qian SE, Fei C (2009) Hyperspectral classification fusion for classifying different military targets. IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp 3:262–265

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Bioucas-Dias JM, Plaza A (2012) Spectralspatial hyperspectral image segmentation using subspace multinomial logistic regression and Markov random fields. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50(3):809–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu J, Xiao Z, Xiao L (2016) Superpixel-guided multiscale kernel collaborative representation for hyperspectral image classification. Remote Sens Lett 7(10):975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Melgani F, Bruzzone L (2004) Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42(8):1778–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moody DI, Smith DA, Brumby SP (2014) Automatic detection of pulsed radio frequency (rf) targets using sparse representations in undercomplete learned dictionaries. Proc SPIE Automatic Target Recognition XXIV 9090:C1–C11

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pan B, Shi Z, Xu X (2017) R-VCANet: a new deep-learning-based hyperspectral image classification method. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 10(5):1975–1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pontius J, Martin M, Plourde L, Hallett R (2008) Ash decline assessment in emerald ash borer-infested regions: a test of tree-level, hyperspectral technologies. Remote Sens Environ 112(5):2665–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roscher R, Waske B (2016) Shapelet-based sparse representation for landcover classification of hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(3):1623–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saha M, Chakraborty C (2018) Her2net: a deep framework for semantic segmentation and classification of cell membranes and nuclei in breast cancer evaluation. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(5):2189–2200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Shao Y, Gao C, Sang N (2017) A discriminant sparse representation graph-based semi-supervised learning for hyperspectral image classification. Multimed Tools Appl 76(8):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soltani-Farani A, Rabiee HR, Hosseini SA (2015) Spatial-aware dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53 (1):527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun S, Zhong P, Xiao H, Wang R (2014) Active learning with Gaussian process classifier for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(4):1746–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun X, Qu Q, Nasrabadi NM, Tran TD (2014) Structured priors for sparse-representation-based hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(7):1235–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun X, Nasrabadi NM, Tran TD (2015) Task-driven dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification with structured sparsity constraints. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(8):4457–4471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Jiao L (2017) Application of a homogenous patch mean kernel with within-class collaborative representation for hyperspectral imagery classification. Remote Sens Lett 8(1):11–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Z, Nasrabadi NM, Huang TS (2014) Spatial-spectral classification of hyperspectral images using discriminative dictionary designed by learning vector quantization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(8):4808–4822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu S, Chen H, Bai Y, Zhu G (2016) A remote sensing image classification method based on sparse representation. Multimed Tools Appl 75(19):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu Y, Han Y, Hong R, Tian Q (2018) Sequential video VLAD: training the aggregation locally and temporally. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(10):4933–494

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan H, Feng Z, Wang M, Zhang K (2018) Self-paced learning-based probability subspace projection for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 99:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan H, Tang YY (2015) Sparse representation based on set-to-set distance for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 8(6):2464–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang B, Wu D, Zhang L, Jiao Q, Li Q (2012) Application of hyperspectral remote sensing for environment monitoring in mining areas. Environ Earth Sci 65(3):649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H, Li J, Huang Y, Zhang L (2014) A nonlocal weighted joint sparse representation classification method for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 7(6):2056–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang X, Sun Y, Jiang K, Li C, Jiao L, Zhou H (2018) Spatial sequential recurrent neural network for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens pp(99):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhuang H, Deng K, Fan H, Yu M (2016) Strategies combining spectral angle mapper and change vector analysis to unsupervised change detection in multispectral images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 13(5):681–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.61401386 and 61802328. The authors would like to thank Prof. D. Landgrebe and Prof. P. Gamba for providing the hyperspectral data set. In addition, we also would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Deng.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, C., Deng, L., Duan, W. et al. Hyperspectral image classification via compact-dictionary-based sparse representation. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 15011–15031 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6885-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6885-5

Keywords

Navigation