Abstract
In this paper relationship of perceived virtual reality (VR) sickness phenomenon with different generations of virtual reality head mounted displays (VR HMD) is presented. Action content type omnidirectional video clip was watched by means of four HMDs of different levels of technological matureness, with a 2D monitor used as a reference point. In addition to subjective estimation of VR sickness effects by means of the SSQ questionnaire, psychophysiology of the participants was monitored. Participant’s electrodermal activity, heart rate, skin temperature and respiration rate were measured. Results of the study indicate differences between HMDs in both SSQ score and changes of physiology. Skin conductance was found to be significantly correlated with VR sickness. Mobile HMD did not induce significantly higher levels of VR sickness. Disorientation SSQ was proven to be a useful tool for assessing the VR sickness effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthes C et al (2016) State of the art of virtual reality technology. Aerospace Conference, 2016 IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2016.7500674
Aram K, Darakjian N, Finley JM (2017) Walking in fully immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of potential adverse effects in older adults and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehab 14.1:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0225-2
Bojko A (2013) Eye tracking the user experience: a practical guide to research. Rosenfeld Media, USA
Boucsein W (2012) Electrodermal activity, second edn. Springer, New York
Castelvecchi D (2016) Low-cost headsets boost virtual reality's lab appeal. Nature 533(7602). https://doi.org/10.1038/533153a
Castelvecchi D (2016) Gartner's 2016 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. Gartner Inc. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3412017. Accessed 16 August 2017
Chen M, Hao Y (2018) Task offloading for mobile edge computing in software defined ultra-dense network. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 36(3):587–597
Chessa M, Maiello G, Borsari A, Bex PJ (2016) The perceptual quality of the oculus rift for immersive virtual reality. Human–Computer Interaction, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1243478
Chirico A et al (2017) Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe: an experimental study. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01242-0
Darragh E et al (2016) An evaluation of Heart Rate and ElectroDermal Activity as an objective QoE evaluation method for immersive virtual reality environments. Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2016 Eighth International Conference on. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498964
Davis S, Nesbitt K, Nalivaiko E (2014) A systematic review of cybersickness. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on interactive entertainment. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677758.2677780
Davis S et al (2015) Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the oculus rift and two virtual roller coasters. Proc 11th Aus Conf Int Entertain (IE) 27:2015
Earnshaw RA (2014) Virtual reality systems. Academic press
Earnshaw RA (2017) Oculus Rift CV1. https://www.oculus.com/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Earnshaw RA (2017) HTC VIVE. https://www.vive.com/eu/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Earnshaw RA (2017) Sony PSVR. https://www.playstation.com/enus/explore/playstation-vr/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Earnshaw RA (2017) OSVR. http://www.osvr.org/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Earnshaw RA (2017) Google VR. https://vr.google.com/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Earnshaw RA (2017) Samsung Galaxy GearVR. http://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/gear-vr/. Accessed 16 August 2017
Gavgani AM, Hodgson DM, Nalivaiko E (2017) Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness. PLoS One 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182790
Gržinič Frelih N, Podlesek A, Babič J et al (2016) Evaluation of psychological effects on human postural stability. Measurement 98(2017):186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.11.039
Häkkinen J et al (2006) Simulator sickness in virtual display gaming: a comparison of stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic situations. Proceedings of the 8th conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152263
Ishihara S (1960) Tests for colour-blindness. Kanehara Shuppan Company, Japan
Jerald J (2015) The VR book: human-centered design for virtual reality. Morgan & Claypool
Johnson DM (2005) Introduction to and review of simulator sickness research. Army Research Inst Field Unit Fort Rucker Al
Kennedy RS, Norman EL, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3.3(b):203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
Kim YY, Kim HJ, Kim EN et al (2005) Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness. Psychophysiology 42(5):616–625
Kim K et al (2014) Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 113(3):882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.12.024
Kren M, Kos A, Zhang Y et al (2017) Public interest analysis based on implicit feedback of IPTV users. IEEE Trans Indust Inform 13(4):2077–2086
LaViola JJ Jr (2000) A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull 32(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344
Lawson BD (2014) Motion sickness symptomatology and origins. In: Handbook of virtual environment: design, implementation, and applications, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 532–587. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17360-29
Lu H et al (2017) Wound intensity correction and segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Concurren Comput: Pract Exp 29(6):e3927
Lu H et al (2017) FDCNet: filtering deep convolutional network for marine organism classification. Multimed Tools Appl 77(17):21847–21860
Macedonio MF et al (2007) Immersiveness and physiological arousal within panoramic video-based virtual reality. Cyberpsychol Behav 10.4:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9997
MacQuarrie A, Steed A (2017) Cinematic virtual reality: evaluating the effect of display type on the viewing experience for panoramic video. Virtual reality (VR). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892230
McGill M, Ng A, Brewster S (2017) I Am The Passenger: How Visual Motion Cues Can Influence Sickness For In-Car VR. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026046
Nalivaiko E, Davis SL, al BKL (2015) Cybersickness provoked by head-mounted display affects cutaneous vascular tone, heart rate and reaction time. Physiol Behav 1(151):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.043
Ogorevc J, Geršak G, Novak D et al (2013) Metrological evaluation of skin conductance measurements. Measurement 46(9):2993–3782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.024
Petry B, Huber J (2015) Towards effective interaction with omnidirectional videos using immersive virtual reality headsets. Proceedings of the 6th augmented human international conference. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2735711.2735785
Rebenitsch L, Owen C (2016) Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality 20(2):101–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9
Rosa PJ et al (2016) The immersive virtual reality experience: a typology of users revealed through multiple correspondence analysis combined with cluster analysis technique. Cyberpsychol, Behav, Soc Network 19.3:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0130
Settgast V, Pirker J, Lontschar S et al (2016) Evaluating experiences in different virtual reality setups. In: Wallner G et al (eds) Entertainment computing - ICEC 2016. ICEC 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9926. Springer, Cham
Sharples S et al (2008) Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29.2:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005
Singla A et al (2017) Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displays. Quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), 2017 ninth international conference on. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2017.7965658
Steinicke F, Bruder G (2014) A self-experimentation report about long-term use of fully-immersive technology. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on spatial user interaction. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659766.2659767
Suznjevic M, Mandurov M, Matijasevic M (2017) Performance and QoE assessment of HTC Vive and oculus rift for pick-and-place tasks in VR. Quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), 2017 ninth international conference on. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2017.7965679
Tong X et al (2016) Usability comparisons of head-mounted vs. stereoscopic desktop displays in a virtual reality environment with pain patients. MMVR
Treleaven J et al (2015) Simulator sickness incidence and susceptibility during neck motion-controlled virtual reality tasks. Virtual Reality 19(3-4):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0266-4
Webb CM et al (2009) Simulator sickness in a helicopter flight training school. Aviat Space Environ Med 80(6):541–545. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2454.2009
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the participants for their time and effort.
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P2-0246).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geršak, G., Lu, H. & Guna, J. Effect of VR technology matureness on VR sickness. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 14491–14507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6969-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6969-2