Skip to main content
Log in

Boosting the accuracy of differentially private in weighted social networks

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social network not only helps people to build its internet applicable service, but also collects a large amount of user information (i.e., sensitive data), which may reveal potential privacy information by analyzing these data. At present, the differential privacy protection model gives a rigorous, quantitative representation and proof to the risk of privacy disclosure, which greatly ensures the availability of data. MBCI, a stochastic perturbation algorithm based on differential privacy, is designed. First, it uses the undirected weighted graph as the social network, and the sequence of edge weight is treated as an ordered histogram. Then, the buckets with the same count are merged into groups in the histogram and it satisfies the differential privacy by adding the noise to the weights with sensitive information. The shortest path of the network keeps unchanged by consistent reasoning of the original sequence. In order to reduce the more substantial error MBCI generated, we propose a novel algorithm - LMBCI. LMBCI first divides the original weighted social network and then constructs an algorithm under the differential privacy for each sub-network. The experimental results show that LMBCI can effectively reduce the error, improve the accuracy and retain more statistical characteristics compared with MBCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandaru V, Bhavani SD (2011) Graph Isomorphism Detection Using Vertex Similarity Measure. Contemporary Computing-International Conference DBLP, pp. 113–122

  2. Das S, Egecioglu Ö, Abbadi AE (2010) Anonymizing weighted social network graphs. IEEE, International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, pp. 904–907

  3. Dwork C (2006) Differential Privacy. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Automata, Languages and Programming, Venice, pp. 1–12

  4. Dwork C, Mcsherry F, Nissim K, et al (2006) Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis. Theory of Cryptography, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 265–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay M, Rastogi V, Miklau G et al (2010) Boosting the accuracy of differentially private histograms through consistency. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 3(1–2):1021–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kearsley AJ (2006) Projections onto Order Simplexes and Isotonic Regression. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards & Technology 111(2):121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulkarni AR (2014) Advanced Unsupervised Anonymization Technique in Social Networks for Privacy Preservation. International Journal of Science and Research 3(4):118–125

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lan LH, Ju SG (2015) Privacy preserving based on differential privacy for weighted social networks. J Commun 36(9):145–159

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lan LH, Ju SG (2016) Privacy Preserving Method Based on Random Projection for Weighted Social Networks. Comput Therm Sci 43(3):151–157

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Shen H (2010) Anonymizing graphs against weight-based attacks. ICDMW 2010, The 10th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Sydney, Australia. IEEE

  11. Li X, Yang J, Sun Z et al (2017) Differential Privacy for Edge Weights in Social Networks. Security & Communication Networks 2017(4):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu L, Wang J, Liu J, et al (2009) Privacy preserving in social networks against sensitive edge disclosure. In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

  13. Liu SY, Zhu YH (2018) Differential privacy protection for social network edge weights. Computer Engineering and Design 39(1):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mcsherry FD (2010) Privacy integrated queries: an extensible platform for privacy-preserving data analysis. Commun ACM 53(9):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naga V, Glenn D (2019) A Social Network Analysis (SNA) Study On Data Breach Concerns Over Social Media. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 1–8. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/60155

  16. Nie L, Song X, Chua TS (2016) Learning from Multiple Social Networks. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts Retrieval & Services 8(2):118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nie L, Zhang L, Wang M et al (2017) Learning User Attributes via Mobile Social Multimedia Analytics. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 8(3):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skarkala ME, Maragoudakis M, GritzalisS S et al Privacy preservation by k-anonymization of weighted social networks. Proceeding of ASONAM’12. IEEE Computer Society 2012:423–428

  19. Xiong P, Zhu TQ, Wang XF (2014) A Survey on Differential Privacy and Applications. Chinese Journal of Computers 37(1):101–122

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu J, Zhang Z, Xiao X et al (2013) Differentially private histogram publication. VLDB J 22(6):797–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou B, Pei J, Luk WS (2008) A brief survey on anonymization techniques for privacy preserving publishing of social network data. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 10(2):12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zou L, Chen L, Özsu MT (2009) K-Automorphism: A General Framework For Privacy Preserving Network Publication. VLDB Endowment

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province (No. Guizhou-Science-Contract-Major-Program [2018]3001). Great appreciation goes to the editorial board and the reviewers of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigong Long.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Long, S. Boosting the accuracy of differentially private in weighted social networks. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 34801–34817 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08092-0

Keywords

Navigation