Skip to main content
Log in

Double compression detection for H.264 videos with adaptive GOP structure

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a blind forensic method, double compression detection is valid to multiple manipulations. However, the existing methods only consider to detect the videos with fixed Group of Pictures (GOP). In this paper, we put forward a novel double compression detection method for videos with both fixed and adaptive GOP structure in H.264 videos. Considering that video may contain adaptive GOPs caused by fast moving contents or scene changes, in our double compression detection scheme, temporal segmentation is first used to divide video into static and rapid periods which contain normal fixed and adaptive GOPs respectively. Then, new artifacts based on the sequence of frame’s byte count (FBC) are analyzed. A feature sequence composed of recognizable distances is generated by combining the artifacts in the static and rapid periods of video. Finally, to reveal the intrinsic property of the feature sequence, a scoring strategy is designed to determine whether or not double compression. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed scheme is effective to detect double compression of H.264 videos, and it outperforms other existing state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghamaleki JA, Behrad A (2017) Malicious inter-frame video tampering detection in MPEG videos using time and spatial domain analysis of quantization effects. Mult Tools App 76(20):20691– 20717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Sun T, Jiang X, He P, Wang S, Shi YQ (2016) Detecting double H.264 compression based on analyzing prediction residual distribution. In: International workshop on digital watermarking. Springer, pp 61–74

  3. Chen W, Shi YQ (2008) Detection of double MPEG compression based on first digit statistics. In: International workshop on digital watermarking. Springer, pp 16–30

  4. Feng C, Xu Z, Jia S, Zhang W, Xu Y (2016) Motion-adaptive frame deletion detection for digital video forensics. IEEE Trans Circ Sys Vid Technol 27(12):2543–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He P, Jiang X, Sun T, Wang S (2017) Detection of double compression in MPEG-4 videos based on block artifact measurement. Neurocomputing 228:84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang X, Wang W, Sun T, Shi YQ, Wang S (2013) Detection of double compression in MPEG-4 videos based on markov statistics. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(5):447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang X, He P, Sun T, Xie F, Wang S (2017) Detection of double compression with the same coding parameters based on quality degradation mechanism analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 13(1):170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo W, Wu M, Huang J (2008) MPEG Recompression detection based on block artifacts. In: Security, forensics, steganography, and watermarking of multimedia contents X, vol 6819, p 68190X. International society for optics and photonics

  9. Milani S, Fontani M, Bestagini P, Barni M, Piva A, Tagliasacchi M, Tubaro S (2012) An overview on video forensics. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 1

  10. Singh RD, Aggarwal N (2018) Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey. Mult Sys 24(2):211–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stamm MC, Wu M, Liu KR (2013) Information forensics: an overview of the first decade. IEEE Access 1:167–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su Y, Xu J (2010) Detection of double-compression in MPEG-2 videos. In: 2010 2nd international workshop on intelligent systems and applications. IEEE, pp 1–4

  13. Sun T, Wang W, Jiang X (2012) Exposing video forgeries by detecting MPEG double compression. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, pp 1389–1392

  14. Vazquez-Padin D, Fontani M, Bianchi T, Comesaña P., Piva A, Barni M (2012) Detection of video double encoding with GOP size estimation. In: 2012 IEEE International workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS). IEEE, pp 151–156

  15. Wang W, Farid H (2006) Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting double MPEG compression. In: Proceedings of the 8th workshop on multimedia and security. ACM, pp 37–47

  16. Wang W, Farid H (2009) Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting double quantization. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM workshop on Multimedia and security. ACM, pp 39–48

  17. Wolf S, Pinson M (2009) A no reference (nr) and reduced reference (rr) metric for detecting dropped video frames. In: Fourth international workshop on video processing and quality metrics for consumer electronics, VPQM, vol 5, p 3

  18. Yao H, Song S, Qin C, Tang Z, Liu X (2017) Detection of double-compressed H.264/AVC video incorporating the features of the string of data bits and skip macroblocks. Symmetry 9(12):313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development of China (2018YFC0807306), National NSF of China (61672090, 61532005), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018JBZ001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongrong Ni.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, H., Ni, R. & Zhao, Y. Double compression detection for H.264 videos with adaptive GOP structure. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 5789–5806 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08306-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08306-5

Keywords

Navigation