Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Video compression using frame redundancy elimination and discrete cosine transform coefficient reduction

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need of human beings for better social media applications has increased tremendously. This increase has necessitated the need for a digital system with a larger storage capacity and more processing power. However, an increase in multimedia content size reduces the overall processing performance. This occurs because the process of storing and retrieving large files affects the execution time. Therefore, it is extremely important to reduce the multimedia content size. This reduction can be achieved by image and video compression. There are two types of image or video compression: lossy and lossless. In the latter compression, the decompressed image is an exact copy of the original image, while in the former compression, the original and the decompressed image differ from each other. Lossless compression is needed when every pixel matters. This can be found in autoimage processing applications. On the other hand, lossy compression is used in applications that are based on human visual system perception. In these applications, not every single pixel is important; rather, the overall image quality is important. Many video compression algorithms have been proposed. However, the balance between compression rate and video quality still needs further investigation. The algorithm developed in this research focuses on this balance. The proposed algorithm exhibits diversity of compression stages used for each type of information such as elimination of redundant and semi redundant frames, elimination by manipulating consecutive XORed frames, reducing the discrete cosine transform coefficients based on the wanted accuracy and compression ratio. Neural network is used to further reduce the frame size. The proposed method is a lossy compression type, but it can reach the near-lossless type in terms of image quality and compression ratio with comparable execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed N (1991) How I came up with the discrete cosine transform. Digital Signal Processing 1(1):4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ani M, Hammouri T (2011) Video compression algorithm based on frame difference approaches. Int J Soft Computing 2(4):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alshehri S (2016) Neural network technique for image compression. IET Image Process 10(3):222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bampis C, Li Z, Katsavounidis I, Huang T, Ekanadham C, Bovik A (2018) Towards perceptually optimized end-to-end adaptive video streaming. CoRR, vol. abs/1808.03898, [online] https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03898.).

  5. Chriqui M, Sinha P (2003) Survey of motion estimation techniques for video compression. Proc. SPIE 4796, low-light-level and real-time imaging systems, components, and applications (https://doi.org/10.1117/12.452142)

  6. Grgic S, Grgic M, Mrak M (2004) Reliability of objective picture quality measures. J Electr Eng 55(1–2):3–1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1248017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jayant N, Johnston J, Safrnnck R (1993) Signal compression based on models of human perception. Proc IEEE 81(10):385–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavitha S, Anandhi R (2015) A survey of image compression methods for low depth-of-field images and image sequences. Multimed Tools Appl 74:7943–7956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loukil H, Kacem M, BouhleL M (2012) A new image quality metric using system visual human characteristics. Int J Comp Appl 60(6):32–36. https://doi.org/10.5120/9697-4138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma S, Zhang X, Jia C, Zhao Z (2019) Image and video compression with neural networks: a review. IEEE Trans On Circuits Syst Video Technol:1–1

  11. Mrak M, Grgic S, Grgic M (2003) Picture quality measures in image compression systems. Proceedings of the Eurocon 2003 conference, 233-237, Sep. (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1248017/citations?tabFilter=papers#citations)

  12. Nadenau M, Winkler S, Alleysson D, Kunt M (2003) Human vision models for perceptually optimized image processing – a review. IEEE trans. Image Process 12:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pathak K, Arjunan R, Acharya V (2019) An innovative lossless image and video compression using revised S transformation. J Adv Res Dynamical Control Syst 11(4):14–24

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pullareddi M, Fathima A (2017) A review on image and video compression standards. Asian J Pharmaceutical Clin Res 10(13):373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raz S, Hashim N, Yahya S, Aziz K, Salleh A, Mohamad N (2014) Different approach of VIDEO compression technique: a study. Int J Sci Eng Appl 3(5):143–149

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rehman M, Sharif M, Raza M (2014) Image compression: a survey. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 7(4):656–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandy T, Theint K (2019) Analysis of video compression algorithms using DCT, DWT and FFT. Nat J Parallel Soft Comp 1(1):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  18. Setyaningsih E, Harjoko A (2017) Survey of Hybrid Image Compression Techniques. Int J Electrical Comp Eng 7(4):2206–2214. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v7i3.pp2206-2214 (http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/view/7762)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan G, Ohm J, Han W, Wiegand T (2012) Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 22(12):1649–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tawalbeha M, Eardley A, Tawalbeh L (2016) Studying the energy consumption in Mobile devices. Procedia Computer Sci 94:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E (2004) Image quality assessment: from error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Processing 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saleh Ali Alshehri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshehri, S.A. Video compression using frame redundancy elimination and discrete cosine transform coefficient reduction. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 367–381 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09038-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09038-7

Keywords

Navigation