Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient measurement matrix for speech compressive sampling

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Signal sampling is an important concern for compressive sensing framework. The use of efficient sampling may enhance the overall performance by collecting informative samples. The work done in this paper is aimed to propose the efficient sampling matrix for speech compressive sensing by reviewing the reconstruction results obtained via conventionally used measurement matrices. Recently used measurement matrices are either randomly structured or deterministic in nature. Therefore, the prime objective of this work is to analyse speed and reconstruction performance of 1-norm minimization algorithm when samples are provided by the concerned sampling matrix. The speed and accuracy analysis is intended to propose efficient sampling matrix which can facilitate faithful signal reconstruction process for speech compressive sensing. The sampling matrices chosen for this work are Bernoulli random matrix, Gaussian random matrix, Hadamard matrix and Toeplitz matrix. The observed matrices are carefully adjusted to provide different range of sampling ratios for signal recovery process. In this work, the number of input samples are changed (from 10% to 40%) to search for the efficient sampling matrix which can survive the least possible number of samples. The performances of the sampling matrices are compared on the basis of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values and reconstruction time (in seconds) is obtained via 1 minimization method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed I, Ahmad N, Ali H, Ahmad G (2012) The development of isolated words pashto automatic speech recognition system. In: 2012 18th international conference on automation and computing (ICAC). IEEE, pp 1–4

  2. Ahmed I, Ali H, Ahmad N, Ahmad G (2012) The development of isolated words corpus of pashto for the automatic speech recognition research. In: 2012 international conference of robotics and artificial intelligence. IEEE, pp 139–143

  3. Ahmed I, Khan A, Ahmad N, Ali H, et al. (2020) Speech signal recovery using block sparse bayesian learning. Arab J Sci Eng 45(3):1567–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arjoune Y, Kaabouch N, Ghazi HE, Tamtaoui A (2017) Compressive sensing: performance comparison of sparse recovery algorithms. In: 2017 IEEE 7th annual computing and communication workshop and conference (CCWC). IEEE, pp 1–7

  5. Arjoune Y, Kaabouch N, Ghazi HE, Tamtaoui A (2018) A performance comparison of measurement matrices in compressive sensing. Int J Commun Syst 31(10):e3576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bala S, Arif M (2015) Effect of sparsity on speech compressed sensing. In: 2015 international conference on signal processing, computing and control (ISPCC). IEEE, pp 81–86

  7. Candès EJ, Wakin MB (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 25(2):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrillo RE, Ramirez AB, Arce GR, Barner KE, Sadler BM (2016) Robust compressive sensing of sparse signals: a review. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2016(1):108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SS, Donoho DL, Saunders MA (2001) Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev 43(1):129–159

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng C, Lin W, Lee B-s, Lau CT (2010) Robust image compression based on compressive sensing. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME). IEEE, p 2010

  11. Dias U, Rane ME (2013) Comparative analysis of sensing matrices for compressed sensed thermal images. In: 2013 international mutli-conference on automation, computing, communication, control and compressed sensing (imac4s). IEEE, pp 265–270

  12. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 52(4):1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Haider H, Shah JA, Ali U (2014) Comparative analysis of sparse signal recovery algorithms based on minimization norms. In: World congress on sustainable technologies (WCST-2014). IEEE, pp 72–76

  14. Nguyen TLN, Shin Y (2013) Deterministic sensing matrices in compressive sensing: a survey. Sci World J 2013(4). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/192795

  15. Pearlsy PV, Sankar D (2018) Implementation of compressive sensing for speech signals. In: 2018 8th international symposium on embedded computing and system design (ISED). IEEE, pp 162–166

  16. Qaisar S, Bilal RM, Iqbal W, Naureen M, Lee S (2013) Compressive sensing: from theory to applications, a survey. Journal of Communications and networks 15(5):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salan S, Muralidharan KB (2017) Image reconstruction based on compressive sensing using optimized sensing matrix. In: 2017 international conference on intelligent computing, instrumentation and control technologies (ICICICT). IEEE, pp 252–256

  18. Tang X, Wu S, Dong R, Xia G (2018) Application of compressed sensing theory in the sampling and reconstruction of speech signals. In: 2nd international forum on management, education and information technology application (IFMEITA 2017). Atlantis Press

  19. Wang Z, Bovik AC (2009) Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 26(1):98–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei Z, Zhang J, Xu Z, Liu Y (2020) Measurement matrix optimization via mutual coherence minimization for compressively sensed signals reconstruction. Math Probl Eng, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7979606

  21. Yin M, Yu K, Wang Z (2016) Compressive sensing based sampling and reconstruction for wireless sensor array network. Math Probl Eng, 2016

  22. Zaeemzadeh A, Joneidi M, Rahnavard N (2017) Adaptive non-uniform compressive sampling for time-varying signals. arXiv:1703.03340

  23. Zhang Z, Wei S, Wei D, Lin L, Liu F, Liu C (2016) Comparison of four recovery algorithms used in compressed sensing for ecg signal processing. In: Proceedings of the Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 11–14

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, I., Khan, A., Khan, A. et al. Efficient measurement matrix for speech compressive sampling. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 20327–20343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10657-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10657-x

Keywords

Navigation