Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capturing the real customer experience based on the parameters in the call detail records

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customer Experience-Management (CEM) has emerged as a key differentiator in recent fierce market of telecommunication. A positive customer experience leads to increased loyalty, lower churn rate, more recommendations and optimistic word of mouth. In this era of technology, digital data has become an asset of any business. This paper proposes a technique that calculates the Customer Experience Management Index (CEMI) of subscribers of cellular network services providers by using their Call Detail Records (CDRs). In the first phase, CDR Dataset of subscribers, using the same cellular network operators, is collected. In the second phase, a close-ended telephonic survey is prepared and conducted on these subscribers of targeted valued community or social network. Six attributes of telecommunication service are selected i.e. network coverage, voice call quality, drop call rate, Short Message Service delivery, internet service and call setup duration. The subscribers are requested to grade each attribute as per their experience while using that service and to rate the service collectively in order to identify the overall experience. Genetic Algorithm (GA) is applied to optimize the weights for each attribute to eventually formulate a mathematical model for CEMI calculation. The proposed technique uses the difference between weighted attributes based on calculated CEMI and actual CEMI provided during survey process as cost function for GA which updates weights in such a way to have minimal value of this cost function. Same attributes are selected from CDRs and they are graded on the same scale which is used in survey based on the events and flags presented in the CDRs. While concluding the results, the obtained optimized weights are applied to the technical attributes of the CDRs data set and the CEMI is calculated. The proposed technique calculates the CEMI in real-time with an accuracy of 84.5 % and error of 0.248.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry L, Carbone L (2007) Build loyalty through experience management. Qual Prog 40:26–32. https://search.proquest.com/magazines/build-loyalty-through-experience-management/docview/214762632/se-2?accountid=35481. Accessed 21/1/2021

  2. Bhutto R, Maqsood A (2007) Customer services: a case study of cellular phone companies in Pakistan. J Indep Stud Res 5:19–23. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2007.05.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbone L, Haeckel S (1994) Engineering customer experiences. Mark Manag 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Day R, Landon J (1977) Toward a theory of consumer complaining behavior. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. ETSI (1996) Digital cellular telecommunication system (Phase 2+); Point-to-Point (PP) Short Message Service (SMS) Support on Mobile Radio Interface (GSM 04.11). https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gts/04/0411/05.01.00_60/gsmts_0411v050100p.pdf. Accessed:26/1/2021

  6. ETSI TS 148 008 V11.7.0. (2013) Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Mobile Switching Centre - Base Station system (MSC-BSS) interface; Layer 3 specification. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gts/08/0802/05.01.00_60/gsmts_0802v050100p.pdf. Accessed 26/1/2021

  7. ETSI T (2015) Digital Cellular Teleco Multiplexing and m (3GPP TS 45.0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 145 002 V12.4.0 Release 12. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/145000_145099/145002/12.04.00_60/ts_145002v120400p.pdf. Accessed 26/1/2021

  8. Fox B, Rob V (2013) Telecom’s future is social. IBM Institute for Business Value. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/telecomsocialbusiness/. Accessed 21/1/2021

  9. Gentile C, Spiller N, Noci G (2007) How to sustain the customer experience: an overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. Eur Manag J 25:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jony R (2013) Preprocessing solutions for telecommunication specific big data use cases. Dissertation, Aalto University

  11. Khan N, Akram M, Shah A, Khan S (2017) Important attributes of customer satisfaction in telecom industry: A survey based study. 4th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences, Salmabad, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETAS.2017.8277858

  12. Kima M, Parkb M, Jeonga D (2004) The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean Mobile Telecommunication Services. Telecommun Policy 28:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malviya R, Varma V (2012) A value-based approach to improve customer experience, https://www.wipro.com/communications-/a-value-based-approach-to-improve-customer-experience-/. Accessed 26/1/2021.

  14. Manning H (2016) Customer Experience Index (CX Index). Forrester Research, Inc. https://go.forrester.com/analytics/cx-index/. Accessed 26/1/2021

  15. Meyer C, Schwager A (2007) Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pan Y, He F, Yu H (2019) A novel enhanced collaborative autoencoder with knowledge distillation for top-N recommender systems. Neurocomputing 332:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan Y, He F, Yu H (2020) A correlative denoising autoencoder to model social influence for top-N recommender system. Front Comput Sci 14(3):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pezeshki V, Mousavi A, Grant S (2009) Importance-performance analysis of service attributes and its impact on decision making in the mobile telecommunication industry. Meas Bus Excell 13:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040910943072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reber E, Michell R, Carter C (1988) Oxygen absorption in the earth’s atmosphere. Aerospace Corp., Los Angeles, CA, Tech. Rep. TR-0200 (4230-46)-3

  20. Richardson A (2010) Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/10/understandingcustomer-experience. Accessed 26/1/2021

  21. SAS/STAT® 14.1 User’s Guide © (2015) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/141/whatsnew.pdf. Accessed 26/1/2021

  22. Shaw C, Ivens J (2005) Building a great customer experience. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shrivastava P, Sinha P (2016) Reducing call drops due to cell failure. Int J Eng Comput Sci 5:15677–15680. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijecs/v5i2.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith S et al (2013) Conceptualizing and evaluating experiences with brands on facebook. Int J Mark Res 55:357–374. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2013-034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subramanian P, Palaniappan S (2016) Determinants of customer experience in the telecom industry using confirmatory factor analysis: an empirical study. Int J Concept Comput Inf Technol 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norah Saleh Alghamdi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, N., Akram, M.U., Shah, A. et al. Capturing the real customer experience based on the parameters in the call detail records. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 28439–28461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10897-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10897-x

Keywords

Navigation