Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A self-embedding technique for tamper detection and localization of medical images for smart-health

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the prodigious headway of the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and big data, smart healthcare is expected to provide potential and competent healthcare services. Smart healthcare is changing the traditional healthcare system by making it more convenient, more expedient, more effective, and more personalized. The rampant health sector data breaches worldwide, however, testify to the need of ensuring the integrity and authenticity of data shared over insecure networks. In this paper, a secure self-embedding fragile watermarking scheme capable of authenticating the medical images and precisely localizing the tampered regions is presented. Two watermarks generated from the cover image called authentication watermark and localization watermark, are used for authentication and localization of the tampered region at the receiver. For watermark generation, the cover image is divided into 4 × 4 non-overlapping blocks. Each block is permuted using chaotic encryption before the watermark generation. The authentication watermark is a function of the 4-Most Significant Bits (MSBs) of each pixel of a block. Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) encoding is used to ensure the security of the authentication watermark before its embedding. The localization watermark utilizes the arithmetic mean of a selected block and the Maximum Pixel Intensity (MPI) in that block. The DNA arithmetic is applied to generate the final authentication of watermark data. The tamper detection and localization results obtained for the proposed work are found to perform better compared to the state-of-art techniques. The proposed algorithm maintains better visual quality despite higher embedding capacity as indicated by an average Peak Signal to Noise (PSNR) value of 51.94 dB for an embedding capacity of 262,144 bits. The average value for the Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM) for the proposed scheme is found to be 0.9962 which is higher when compared to the techniques under comparison. The average False Positive Rate (FPR) for the proposed algorithm is found to be 3.9916 for tampering rates varied from 5 to 50%. The scheme outperforms the various state-of-the-art techniques making it an efficient candidate for tamper detection and localization in smart health applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansari IA, Pant M, Ahn CW (2015) SVD based fragile watermarking scheme for tamper localization and self-recovery. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1225–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anwer AA (2015) Exploiting similarities between secret and cover images for improved embedding efficiency and security in digital steganography. Doctoral thesis, University of Buckingham

  3. Atawneh S, Almomani A, Al Bazar H et al (2017) Secure and imperceptible digital image steganographic algorithm based on diamond encoding in DWT domain. Multimed Tools Appl 76:18451–18472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3930-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azeroual A, Afdel K (2017) Real-time image tamper localisation based on fragile watermarking and Faber-Schauder wavelet. Int J Commun (AEÜ) 79:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barani MJ, Valandar MY, Ayubi P (2019) A new digital image tamper detection algorithm based on integer wavelet transform and secured by encrypted authentication sequence with 3D quantum map. Optik 187:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhalerao S, Ansari IA, Kumar AA (2020) Secure image watermarking for tamper detection and localization. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12:1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02135-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao F, An B, Wang J, Ye D, Wang H (2017) Hierarchical recovery for tampered images based on watermark self-embedding. Displays 46:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorgham O, Al-Rahamneh B, Almomani A, Al-Hadidi M, Khatatneh KF (2018) Enhancing the security of exchanging and storing DICOM medical images on the cloud. Int J Cloud Appl Comput (IJCAC) 8(1):154–172. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCAC.2018010108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan M, Wang H (2018) An enhanced fragile watermarking scheme to digital image protection and self-recovery. Signal Process Image Commun 66:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2018.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng B, Li X, Jie Y, Guo C, Fu H (2020) A novel semi-fragile digital watermarking scheme for scrambled image authentication and restoration. Mob Netw Appl 25:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1186-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao Z, Li Y, Sun Y, Yang J, Xiong H, Zhang H, Liu X, Wu W, Liang D, Li S (2018) Motion tracking of the carotid Artery Wall from ultrasound image sequences: a nonlinear state-space approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(1):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2746879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goléa NEH, Melkemi KE (2019) ROI-based fragile watermarking for medical image tamper detection. Int J High Perform Comput Netwo 13(2):199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHPCN.2019.097508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gull S, Loan NA, Parah SA (2018) An efficient watermarking technique for tamper detection and localization of medical images. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2018:1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1158-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haghighi B, Taherinia AH, Harati A (2018) TRLH: fragile and blind dual watermarking for image tamper detection and self-recovery based on lifting wavelet transform and halftoning technique. J Vis Commun Image Represent 50:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2017.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haider M, Tayeb L, Maria M, Damien M (2018) A survey on health monitoring systems for health smart homes. Int J Ind Ergon 66:26–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurrah NN, Parah SA, Sheikh JA (2020) Embedding in medical images: an efficient scheme for authentication and tamper localization. Multimed Tools Appl 79:21441–21470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08988-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaur Y, Ranade SK (2017) Image authentication and tamper detection using fragile watermarking in spatial domain. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol (IJARCET) 6(7):1058–1063

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu X, Lin C, Yuan S (2018) Blind dual watermarking for color images’ authentication and copyright protection. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 28(5):1047–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, You Z, Gao T (2020) Lossless image hierarchical recovery based on POB number system. Signal Process 167:107293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazari M, Sharif S (2017) An improved method for digital image fragile watermarking based on chaotic maps. Multimed Tools Appl 76(15):16107–16123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad S, Pal AK (2020) A tamper detection suitable fragile watermarking scheme based on novel payload embedding strategy. Multimed Tools Appl 79:1673–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08144-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qi X, Xin X (2015) A singular-value-based semi-fragile watermarking scheme for image content authentication with tamper localization. J Vis Commun Image Represent 30:312–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin C, Wang H, Zhang X, Sun X (2016) Self-embedding fragile watermarking based on reference-data interleaving and adaptive selection of embedding mode. Inf Sci 373:233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qin C, Ji P, Wang J, Chang CC (2017) Fragile image watermarking scheme based on vq index sharing and self-embedding. Multimed Tools Appl 76(2):2267–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qin C, Ping J, Zhang X, Jing D, Wang J (2017) Fragile image watermarking with pixel-wise recovery based on overlapping embedding strategy. Signal Process 138:280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saeed S, Mohammad AA (2015) A source-channel coding approach to digital image protection and self-recovery. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(7):2266–2277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarkar D, Palit S, Som S, Dey KN (2020) Large scale image tamper detection and restoration. Multimed Tools Appl 79:17761–17791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08669-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shehab A, Elhoseny M, Muhammad K, Sangaiah AK, Yang P, Huang H, Hou G (2018) Secure and robust fragile watermarking scheme for medical images. IEEE Access 6:10269–10278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shuo T, Wenbo Y, Jehane MLG, Peng W, Wei H, Zhewei Y (2019) Smart healthcare: making medical care more intelligent. Glob Health J 3(3)

  30. Singh D, Singh SK (2015) DCT based efficient fragile watermarking scheme for image authentication and restoration. Multimed Tools Appl 76(1):1–25

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sivasubramanian N, Konganathan G (2020) A novel semi fragile watermarking technique for tamper detection and recovery using IWT and DCT. Computing 102:1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00797-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Swaraja K, Meenakshi K, Kora P (2020) An optimized blind dual medical image watermarking framework for tamper localization and content authentication in secured telemedicine. Biomed Signal Process Control 55:101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tai WL, Liao ZJ (2018) Image self-recovery with watermark self-embedding. Signal Process Image Commun 65:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tiwari A, Sharma M, Tamrakar RK (2017) Watermarking based image authentication and tamper detection algorithm using vector quantization approach. AEU-Int J Electron Commun 78:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tong X, Liu Y, Zhang M, Chen Y (2013) A novel chaos-based fragile watermarking for image tampering detection and self-recovery. Signal Process Image Commun 28(2):301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Trivedy S, Pal AK (2017) A logistic map-based fragile watermarking scheme of digital images with tamper detection. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 41:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-017-0021-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang L, Li L, Li J, Li J, Gupta BB, Liu X (2019) Compressive sensing of medical images with confidentially Homomorphic aggregations. IEEE Internet Things J 6(2):1402–1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Watson JD et al (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 171(4356):737–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiang Y, Xiao D, Wang H, Li X (2019) A secure image tampering detection and self- recovery scheme using POB number system over cloud. Signal Process 162:282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu M, Wang J, Jiang G, Peng Z, Shao F, Luo T (2015) New fragile watermarking method for stereo image authentication with localization and recovery. AEU Int J Electron Commun 69(1):361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2014.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yung CS, Ming YW, Ya CY (2020) Discovering the potential opportunities of scientific advancement and technological innovation: a case study of smart health monitoring technology. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 160:120225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang H, Wang C, Zhou X (2017) Fragile watermarking for image authentication using the characteristic of SVD. Algorithms 10(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang Y, Deng RH, Han G, Zheng D (2018) Secure smart health with privacy aware aggregate authentication and access control in internet of things. J Netw Comput Appl 123:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India for supporting this work under the DST Inspire Fellowship Scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Post Graduate Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Technology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, JK, 190006, India

    Solihah Gull & Shabir A. Parah

  2. Faculty of Science, New Valley University, El-Kharja, 72511, Egypt

    Romany F. Mansour

  3. Computer Science and Information Department Tabuk University, KSA, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

    Nojood O. Aljehane

Authors
  1. Solihah Gull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Romany F. Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nojood O. Aljehane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shabir A. Parah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabir A. Parah.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gull, S., Mansour, R.F., Aljehane, N.O. et al. A self-embedding technique for tamper detection and localization of medical images for smart-health. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 29939–29964 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11170-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11170-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation