Skip to main content
Log in

A novel biometric system for signature verification based on score level fusion approach

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The active modality of handwriting is broadly related to signature verification in the context of biometric user authentication systems. Signature verification aims to verify a questioned signature as being genuine or forged compared to some previously provided signatures from the claimed person. By doing so, we may be able to verify a person’s identity at accuracy and speed even better than human performance. Application areas of signature verification include different purposes and principally in access controls and forensic document examination. This work presents a novel biometric system for signature verification. We propose a new model that we called the Extended Beta-elliptic model and we integrate the fuzzy elementary perceptual codes (FEPC) to extract static and dynamic features. To discriminate the genuine and forgery signatures of a user, we explore a fusion using the sum rule combiner of three scores which are deep bidirectional long short-term memory (deep BiLSTM), support vector machine (SVM) with Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), and SVM with a new proposed parameter comparator. Our system has been evaluated on two publicly available online signature databases namely SVC2004 Task 2 and MCYT-100, and it shows promising performance gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abou elazm LA, Ibrahim S, Egila MG et al (2020) Cancelable face and fingerprint recognition based on the 3D jigsaw transform and optical encryption. Multimed Tools Appl 79:14053–14078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08462-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akouaydi H, Njah S, Ouarda W, et al (2019) Neural architecture based on fuzzy perceptual representation for online multilingual handwriting recognition. arXiv:190800634

  3. Ali W, Tian W, Din SU, Iradukunda D, Khan AA (2021) Classical and modern face recognition approaches: a complete review. Multimed Tools Appl 80:4825–4880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09850-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ansari AQ, Hanmandlu M, Kour J, Singh AK (2013) Online signature verification using segment-level fuzzy modelling. IET Biometrics 3:113–127. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-bmt.2012.0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barkoula K, Economou G, Fotopoulos S (2013) Online signature verification based on signatures turning angle representation using longest common subsequence matching. Int J Doc Anal Recognition (IJDAR) 3:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-012-0193-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batool FE, Attique M, Sharif M, Javed K, Nazir M, Abbasi AA, Iqbal Z, Riaz N (2020) Offline signature verification system: a novel technique of fusion of GLCM and geometric features using SVM. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08851-4

  7. Bhowal P, Banerjee D, Malakar S, Sarkar R (2021) A two-tier ensemble approach for writer dependent online signature verification. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02872-5

  8. Bibi K, Naz S, Rehman A (2020) Biometric signature authentication using machine learning techniques: current trends, challenges and opportunities. Multimed Tools Appl 79:289–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08022-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boubaker H, Chaabouni A, Tagougui N, et al (2013) Handwriting and hand drawing velocity modeling by superposing beta impulses and continuous training component. Int J Comp Science issues (IJCSI) 10:57. Pp 57-63

  10. Boubaker H, Rezzoug N, Kherallah M, Gorce P, Alimi AM (2015) Spatiotemporal representation of 3D hand trajectory based on beta-elliptic models. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:1632–1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2014.940331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brito R, Biuk-Aghai RP, Fong S (2021) GPU-based parallel shadow features generation at neural system for improving gait human activity recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 80:12293–12308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10274-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cpałka K, Zalasiński M, Rutkowski L (2014) New method for the on-line signature verification based on horizontal partitioning. Pattern Recogn 47:2652–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2014.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Bruyne P (1985) Signature verification using holistic measures. Comp Sec 4:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4048(85)90049-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dhieb T, Njah S, Boubaker H, et al (2018) An online writer identification system based on beta-elliptic model and fuzzy elementary perceptual codes. arXiv preprint arXiv:180405661

  15. Dhieb T, Rezzoug N, Boubaker H, Gorce P, Alimi AM (2019) Effect of age on hand drawing movement kinematics. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 22:S188–S190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1714235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dhieb T, Boubaker H, Ouarda W, et al (2019) Deep bidirectional long short-term memory for online Arabic writer identification based on Beta-elliptic model. In: 2019 international conference on document analysis and recognition workshops (ICDARW). Pp 35–40

  17. Dhieb T, Njah S, Boubaker H, Ouarda W, Ben Ayed M, Alimi AM (2020) Towards a novel biometric system for forensic document examination. Comp Secur 97:101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhieb T, Boubaker H, Ouarda W, Njah S, Ben Ayed M, Alimi AM (2021) Deep bidirectional long short-term memory for online multilingual writer identification based on an extended Beta-elliptic model and fuzzy elementary perceptual codes. Multimed Tools Appl 80:14075–14100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10412-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fayyaz M, Saffar MH, Sabokrou M, et al (2015) Online signature verification based on feature representation. In: 2015 the international symposium on artificial intelligence and signal processing (AISP). Pp 211–216

  20. Gordon IE (2004) Theories of visual perception. Psychology Press

  21. Graves A (2012) Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

  22. Guru DS, Manjunatha KS, Manjunath S, Somashekara MT (2017) Interval valued symbolic representation of writer dependent features for online signature verification. Expert Syst Appl 80:232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamdi Y, Boubaker H, Dhieb T, et al (2019) Hybrid DBLSTM-SVM based Beta-elliptic-CNN models for online Arabic characters recognition. In: 2019 international conference on document analysis and recognition (ICDAR). Pp 545–550

  24. Hancer E, Hodashinsky I, Sarin K, Slezkin A (2021) A wrapper metaheuristic framework for handwritten signature verification. Soft Comput 25:8665–8681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05717-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. He L, Tan H, Huang Z-C (2019) Online handwritten signature verification based on association of curvature and torsion feature with Hausdorff distance. Multimed Tools Appl 78:19253–19278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7264-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Houtinezhad M, Ghaffary HR (2020) Writer-independent signature verification based on feature extraction fusion. Multimed Tools Appl 79:6759–6779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08447-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Impedovo D, Pirlo G (2008) Automatic signature verification: the state of the art. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38:609–635. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jain A, Singh SK, Singh KP (2020) Handwritten signature verification using shallow convolutional neural network. Multimed Tools Appl 79:19993–20018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08728-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jain A, Singh SK, Singh KP (2021) Signature verification using geometrical features and artificial neural network classifier. Neural Comput & Applic 33:6999–7010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05473-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kholmatov A, Yanikoglu B (2005) Identity authentication using improved online signature verification method. Pattern Recogn Lett 26:2400–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv:14126980

  33. Lai S, Jin L (2019) Recurrent adaptation networks for online signature verification. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 14:1624–1637. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2018.2883152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leclerc F, Plamondon R (1994) Automatic signature verification: the state of the art?1989?1993. In: Progress in Automatic Signature Verification. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 3–20

  35. Liu L, Huang L, Yin F, Chen Y (2021) Offline signature verification using a region based deep metric learning network. Pattern Recogn 118:108009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. López-García M, Ramos-Lara R, Miguel-Hurtado O, Cantó-Navarro E (2014) Embedded system for biometric online signature verification. IEEE Trans Industrial Inform 10:491–501. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.2269031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lorette G (1999) Handwriting recognition or reading? What is the situation at the dawn of the 3rd millenium? IJDAR 2:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100320050030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mangasarian OL, Wild EW (2001) Proximal support vector machine classifiers. In: proceedings KDD-2001: knowledge discovery and data mining. Pp 77–86

  39. Mohammed RA, Nabi RM, Mahmood SM, Nabi RM (2015) State-of-the-art in handwritten signature verification system. In: 2015 international conference on computational science and computational intelligence (CSCI). Pp 519–525

  40. Njah S, Bezine H, Alimi AM (2010) A new encoding system: application to on-line Arabic handwriting. In: 2010 12th international conference on Frontiers in handwriting recognition. Pp 451–456

  41. Njah S, Bezine H, Alimi AM (2011) On-line arabic handwriting segmentation via perceptual codes: application to MAYASTROUN database. In: Eighth International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals Devices. pp. 1–5

  42. Njah S, Bezine H, Alimi AM (2011) A fuzzy genetic system for segmentation of on-line handwriting: application to ADAB database. In: 2011 IEEE 5th international workshop on genetic and evolutionary fuzzy systems (GEFS). Pp 95–102

  43. Njah S, Ltaief M, Bezine H, Alimi AM (2012) The PerTOHS Theory for On-Line Handwriting Segmentation. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), Vol. 9, Issue 5, No 3, pp.142–151, Link: http://www.ijcsi.org/papers/IJCSI-9-5-3-142-151.pdf

  44. Njah S, Bezine H, Alimi AM (2013) Linguistic interpretation for on-line handwriting using PerTOHS theory. 16th Int Graphonomics society (IGS) 175–178

  45. Okawa M (2019) Template matching using time-series averaging and DTW with dependent warping for online signature verification. IEEE Access 7:81010–81019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Okawa M (2019) Online signature verification using a single-template strategy with mean templates and local stability-weighted dynamic time warping. In: 2019 IEEE 11th international workshop on computational intelligence and applications (IWCIA). Pp 83–88

  47. Okawa M (2020) Online signature verification using single-template matching with time-series averaging and gradient boosting. Pattern Recogn 102:107227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ortega-Garcia J, Fierrez-Aguilar J, Simon D, Gonzalez J, Faundez-Zanuy M, Espinosa V, Satue A, Hernaez I, Igarza JJ, Vivaracho C, Escudero D, Moro QI (2003) MCYT baseline corpus: a bimodal biometric database. IEE Proceed - Vision, Image Signal Process 150:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-vis:20031078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Otte S, Liwicki M, Krechel D (2014) Investigating long short-term memory networks for various pattern recognition problems. In: Perner P (ed) Machine learning and data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 484–497

  50. Ouarda W, Trichili H, Alimi AM, Solaiman B (2014) MLP neural network for face recognition based on Gabor features and dimensionality reduction techniques. In: 2014 international conference on multimedia computing and systems (ICMCS). Pp 127–134

  51. Ouarda W, Trichili H, Alimi AM, Solaiman B (2015) Bag of face recognition systems based on holistic approaches. In: 2015 15th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications (ISDA). Pp 201–206

  52. Pirlo G, Diaz M, Ferrer MA, et al (2015) Behaviour of dynamic and static feature dependences in constrained signatures. In: 2015 13th international conference on document analysis and recognition (ICDAR). Pp 1278–1281

  53. Plamondon R, Lorette G (1989) Automatic signature verification and writer identification — the state of the art. Pattern Recogn 22:107–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(89)90059-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schuster M, Paliwal KK (1997) Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45:2673–2681. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.650093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sharma A, Sundaram S (2016) An enhanced contextual DTW based system for online signature verification using vector quantization. Pattern Recogn Lett 84:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2016.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sharma A, Sundaram S (2017) A novel online signature verification system based on GMM features in a DTW framework. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 12:705–718. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2632063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sharma A, Sundaram S (2018) On the exploration of information from the DTW cost matrix for online signature verification. IEEE Trans Cybernetics 48:611–624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2017.2647826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Song X, Xia X, Luan F (2017) Online signature verification based on stable features extracted dynamically. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybernetics: Syst 47:2663–2676. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2597240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stauffer M, Maergner P, Fischer A, Riesen K (2021) A survey of state of the art methods employed in the offline signature verification process. In: Dornberger R (ed) New trends in business information systems and technology: digital innovation and digital business transformation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 17–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Tan H, He L, Huang Z-C, Zhan H (2021) Online signature verification based on dynamic features from gene expression programming. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11063-z

  61. Tang L, Kang W, Fang Y (2018) Information divergence-based matching strategy for online signature verification. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 13:861–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2769023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tariq U, Aldaej A (2020) Advancing an in-memory computing for a multi-accent real-time voice frequency recognition modeling: a comprehensive study of models & mechanism. Multimed Tools Appl 79:27705–27720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09355-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Viviani P, Schneider R (1991) A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:198–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vorugunti CS, Anoushka, Mukherjee P (2019) A Light Weight and Hybrid Deep Learning Model Based Online Signature Verification. In: 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition Workshops (ICDARW). pp 53–58

  65. Wei Z, Yang S, Xie Y, Li F, Zhao B (2021) SVSV: online handwritten signature verification based on sound and vibration. Inf Sci 572:109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Xia X, Song X, Luan F, Zheng J, Chen Z, Ma X (2018) Discriminative feature selection for on-line signature verification. Pattern Recogn 74:422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Yeung D-Y, Chang H, Xiong Y, George S, Kashi R, Matsumoto T, Rigoll G (2004) SVC2004: first international signature verification competition. In: Zhang D, Jain AK (eds) Biometric authentication. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 16–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  68. Zenati A, Ouarda W, Alimi AM (2021) A new digital steganography system based on hiding online signature within document image data in YUV color space. Multimed Tools Appl 80:18653–18676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10376-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zheng Y, Iwana BK, Malik MI, Ahmed S, Ohyama W, Uchida S (2021) Learning the micro deformations by max-pooling for offline signature verification. Pattern Recogn 118:108008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia under the grant agreement number LR11ES4.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia (grant number LR11ES4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thameur Dhieb.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhieb, T., Boubaker, H., Njah, S. et al. A novel biometric system for signature verification based on score level fusion approach. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 7817–7845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12140-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12140-7

Keywords

Navigation