Skip to main content
Log in

A singular value decomposition representation based approach for robust face recognition

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of face recognition, sparse representation based classification (SRC) and collaborative representation based classification (CRC) have been widely used. Although both SRC and CRC have shown good classification results, it is still controversial whether it is sparse representation or collaborative representation that helps face recognition. In this paper, a new singular value decomposition based classification (SVDC) is proposed for face recognition. The proposed approach performs SVD on the training data of each class, and then determines the class of a test sample by comparing in which class of singular vectors it can be better represented. Experimental results on Yale B, PIE and UMIST datasets show that the proposed method achieves better recognition performance compared with several existing representation based classification algorithms. In addition, by adding Gaussian noise and Salt pepper noise to these datasets, it is proved that SVDC has better robustness. At the same time, the experimental results show that the recognition accuracy of the method acting on the training samples constructed by each class is higher than that of the method acting on the training sets constructed by all classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akhtar N, Shafait F, Mian A (2017) Efficient classification with sparsity augmented collaborative representation. Pattern Recogn 65:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basri R, Jacobs DW (2003) Lambertian reflectance and linear subspaces. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(2):218–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends Mach Learn 3(1):1–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai S, Zhang L, Zuo W, Feng X (2016) A probabilistic collaborative representation based approach for pattern classification. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 2950–2959

  5. Chi Y, Porikli F (2014) Classification and boosting with multiple collaborative representations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(8):1519–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chien JT, Wu CC (2002) Discriminant waveletfaces and nearest feature classifiers for face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(12):1644–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng W, Hu J, Guo J (2018) Face recognition via collaborative representation: Its discriminant nature and superposed representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 40(10):2513–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Georghiades AS, Belhumeur PN, Kriegman DJ (2001) From few to many: illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and pose. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(6):643–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham DB (1998) Characterising virtual eigensignatures for general purpose face recognition. The Book: Face Recognition Form Theory to Applications, pp 446–456

  10. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 770–778

  11. Lan R, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Luo X (2020) Prior knowledge-based probabilistic collaborative representation for visual recognition. IEEE Trans Cybern 50 (4):1498–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin G, Yang M, Yang J, Shen L, Xie W (2018) Robust, discriminative and comprehensive dictionary learning for face recognition. Pattern Recogn 81:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu W, Chawla S, Bailey J, Leckie C, Ramamohanarao K (2012) An efficient adversarial learning strategy for constructing robust classification boundaries. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Joint Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp 649–660

  14. Liu S, Wang Y, Peng Y, Hou S, Wu X (2020) Singular value decomposition-based virtual representation for face recognition. Mach Vis Appl 31(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naseem I, Togneri R, Bennamoun M (2010) Linear regression for face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(11):2106–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Selvan S, Ramakrishnan S (2007) Svd-based modeling for image texture classification using wavelet transformation. IEEE Trans Image Process 16 (11):2688–2696

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shao C, Song X, Feng ZH, Wu X, Zheng Y (2017) Dynamic dictionary optimization for sparse-representation-based face classification using local difference images. Inf Sci 393:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sim T, Baker S, Bsat M (2004) The cmu pose, illumination, and expression database. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(12):1615–1618

    Google Scholar 

  19. Slawski M, Hein M (2013) Non-negative least squares for high-dimensional linear models: consistency and sparse recovery without regularization. Electron J Stat 7:3004–3056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Song X, Feng ZH, Hu G, Kittler J, Wu X (2018) Dictionary integration using 3d morphable face models for pose-invariant collaborative-representation-based classification. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 13(11):2734–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright J, Ganesh A, Yang A, Zhou Z, Ma Y (2011) Sparsity and robustness in face recognition: A tutorial on how to apply the models and tools correctly, arXiv:1111.1014, pp 1–12

  22. Wright J, Yang A, Ganesh A, Sastry SS, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, An W, Zhang L, Zhang D (2020) Sparse, collaborative, or nonnegative representation: which helps pattern classification?. Pattern Recogn 88:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yin HF, Wu X, Feng ZH, Kittler J (2020) Affine non-negative collaborative representation based pattern classification. 2007.05175

  25. Zhang L, Yang M, Feng X (2011) Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition? In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 471–478

  26. Zhang G, Zou W, Zhang X, Hu X, Yong Z (2017) Singular value decomposition based sample diversity and adaptive weighted fusion for face recognition. Digital Signal Process 62:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang G, Zou W, Zhang X, Yong Z (2018) Singular value decomposition based virtual representation for face recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 77 (11):7171–7186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61906098).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianzhong Long.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, X., Zhang, Z. & Li, Y. A singular value decomposition representation based approach for robust face recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 8283–8308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12199-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12199-2

Keywords

Navigation