Skip to main content
Log in

Biocircuit design through engineering bacterial logic gates

  • Published:
Natural Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Designing synthetic biocircuits to perform desired purposes is a scientific field that has exponentially grown over the past decade. The advances in genome sequencing, bacteria gene regulatory networks, as well as the further knowledge of intraspecies bacterial communication through quorum sensing signals are the starting point for this work. Although biocircuits are mostly developed in a single cell, here we propose a model in which every bacterium is considered to be a single logic gate and chemical cell-to-cell connections are engineered to control circuit function. Having one genetically modified bacterial strain per logic process would allow us to develop circuits with different behaviors by mixing the populations instead of re-programming the whole genetic network within a single strain. Two principal advantages of this procedure are highlighted. First, the fully connected circuits obtained where every cellgate is able to communicate with all the rest. Second, the resistance to the noise produced by inappropriate gene expression. This last goal is achieved by modeling thresholds for input signals. Thus, if the concentration of input does not exceed the threshold, it is ignored by the logic function of the gate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alon U (2003) The Tinkerer as an engineer science. Biolog Netw 301(5641):1866–1867

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron JA, Rosen R, Jones-Meehan J, Spargo BJ, Belkin S, Ringeisen BR (2004) Biological laser printing of genetically modified Escherichia coli for biosensor applications. Biosens Bioelectron 20(2):246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt G, Yordanov B, Weiss R, Belta C (2007) Robustness analysis and tuning of synthetic gene networks. Syst. Biol 23(18):2415–2422

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerketorp J, Hkansson S, Belkin S, Jansson JK (2006) Advances in preservation methods: keeping biosensor microorganisms alive and active. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17(1):43-49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner K, Karig DK, Weiss R, Arnold FH (2007) Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(44):17300–17304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BS, Chang CH, Lee HC (2009) Robust synthetic biology design: stochastic game theory approach. Bioinformatics 25(14):1822–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284:1318–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin A (2009) Bacteria as computers making computers. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33(1):3–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard A, Burlingame AL, Eberhard C, Kenyon GL, Nealson KH, Oppenheimer NJ (1981) Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Biochemistry 20(9):2444–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engebrecht J, Silverman M (1984) Identification of genes and gene products necessary for bacterial bioluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4154–4158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engebrecht J, Nealson K, Silverman M (1983) Bacterial bioluminescence: isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri. Cell 32:773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP (1994) Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 176:269–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze T, Lenser T, Matsumaru N, Dittrich P, Hayat S (2008) Biosignal-based computing by AHL induced synthetic gene regulatory networks. From an in vivo flip-flop implementation to programmable computing agents. HFSP J 2(5):239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooshangi S, Weiss R (2006) The effect of negative feedback on noise propagation in transcriptional gene networks. Chaos 16(2):26108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta AM, Salgado H, Thieffry D, Collado-Vides J (1998) RegulonDB: a database on transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 26(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janky R, van Heiden J, Madan Babu M (2009) From analysis of complex networks to discovery of cis-regulatory elements Methods. Investig Transcr Regul 48(3):277–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman A, Wood TK (2008) Bacterial quorum sensing: signals, circuits, and implications for biofilms and disease. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10:145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight TF, Sussman GJ (1997) Cellular gate technology. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathee K, McPherson CJ, Ohman DE (1997) Posttranslational control of the algT (algU)-encoded sigma22 for expression of the alginate regulon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and localization of its antagonist proteins MucA and MucB (AlgN). J Bacteriol 179(11):3711–3720

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya A, Gil R, Latorre A, Juli Peret J, Garcillán-Barcia MP, de la Cruz F (2009) Toward minimal bacterial cells: evolution vs design. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 33:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch R, Hiller K, Barg H, Heldt D, Linz S, Wingender E, Jahn D (2003) PRODORIC: prokaryotic database of gene regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 31(1):266–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyan M, Smolke ChD (2008) Higher-Order cellular information processing with synthetic RNA devices. Science 322(5900):456–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Campero FJ, Perez-Jimenez MJ (2008) A model of the quorum sensing system in Vibrio fischeri. Artif Life 14(1):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seshasayee ASN, Bertone P, Fraser GM, Luscombe NM (2006) Transcriptional regulatory networks in bacteria: from input signals to output responses Curr. Opin Microbiol 9(5):511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storz G, Waters L (2009) Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell 136(4):615–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss R, Homsy G, Nagpal R (1998) Programming biological cells. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems (ASPLOS-VIII), San Jose, California, 3–7 October 1998

  • Wilson D, Charoensawan V, Kummerfeld SK, Teichmann SA (2008) DBD–taxonomically broad transcription factor predictions: new content and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database issue):D88–D92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

M. Redondo-Nieto is the recipient of a contract from MICROAMBIENTE-CM Consortium Program from Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Goñi-Moreno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goñi-Moreno, A., Redondo-Nieto, M., Arroyo, F. et al. Biocircuit design through engineering bacterial logic gates. Nat Comput 10, 119–127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-010-9184-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-010-9184-2

Keywords

Navigation