Skip to main content
Log in

An Equivalence between SILF-SVR and Ordinary Kriging

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Support vector regression (SVR) is a powerful learning technique in the framework of statistical learning theory, while Kriging is a well-entrenched prediction method traditionally used in the spatial statistics field. However, the two techniques share the same framework of reproducing kernel Hilbert space. In this paper, we first review the formulations of SILF-SVR where soft insensitive loss function is utilized and ordinary Kriging, and then prove the equivalence between the two techniques under the assumption that the kernel function is substituted by covariance function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Cortes V. Vapnik (1995) ArticleTitleSupport vector networks Mach Learn. 20 273–297

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Vapnik (2001) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory EditionNumber2 Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Vapnik (1998) Statistical Learning Theory Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.J.C. Burges (1998) ArticleTitleA tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition Knowl. Disc Data Min. 2 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.J. Smola B. Schölkopf (2004) ArticleTitleA tutorial on support vector regression Stat. Comput. 14 199–222 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 Occurrence Handle2086398

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. W.S. An Y.G. Sun (2005) An information-geometrical approach to constructing kernel in support vector regression machines L. Wang K. Chen Y.S. Ong (Eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Natural Computation. Changsha China 544–551

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.F. Lin S.D. Wang (2004) ArticleTitleTraining algorithms for fuzzy support vector machines with noisy data Pattern Recogn. Lett. 25 1647–1656 Occurrence Handle2055306

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kivinen A. Smola R.C. Williamson (2004) ArticleTitleOnline learning with kernels IEEE Trans. Signal Proces. 52 2165–2176 Occurrence Handle2085578

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D.G. Krige (1951) ArticleTitleA statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand J. Chem. Metall. Min. Soc. S. Afr. 52 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Cressie (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data John Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Matheron (1963) ArticleTitlePrinciples of geostatistics Econ. Geol. 58 1246–1266

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Mallet (2002) Geomodeling Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Vazquez E. Walter G. Fleury (2005) ArticleTitleIntrinsic kriging and prior information Appl. Stoch. Model Bus. Ind. 21 215–226 Occurrence Handle2137550

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Yan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe parameter estimation of RBF kernel function based on variogram Acta Automatica Sinica 28 450–455

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Chu S.S. Keerthi C.J. Ong (2004) ArticleTitleBayesian support vector regression using a unified loss function IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 15 29–44 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TNN.2003.820830

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wensen An.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

An, W., Sun, Y. An Equivalence between SILF-SVR and Ordinary Kriging. Neural Process Lett 23, 133–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-005-4015-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-005-4015-7

Keywords

Navigation