Skip to main content
Log in

Compact Hausdorff Approach Frames

  • Published:
Order Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we provide a Heine–Borel type characterization for 0-compactness in approach spaces (Lowen 1997). Since this requires making use of the so-called regular function frame the most natural setting to develop this in is approach frames (Banaschewski 1999; Banaschewski et al., Acta Math Hung 115(3):183–196, 2007, Topology Appl 153:3059–3070, 2006). We then go on to characterize Hausdorffness for approach frames which allows us to study some fundamental properties of compact Hausdorff approach frames.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banaschewski, B.: A Sobering Suggestion. Seminar Notes, Cape Town (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banaschewski, B.: Prime elements from prime ideals. Order 2(2), 211–213 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Banaschewski, B., Lowen, R., Van Olmen, C.: Regularity in approach theory. Acta Math. Hung. 115(3), 183–196 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Banaschewski, B., Lowen, R., Van Olmen, C.: Sober approach spaces. Topology Appl. 153, 3059–3070 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Clementino, M.M., Giuli, E., Tholen, W.: A functional approach to topology. In: Pedicchio, M.C., Tholen, W. (eds.) Categorical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colebunders, E., Lowen, R., Wuyts, P.: A Kuratowski–Mrówka theorem in approach theory. Topology Appl. 153, 756–766 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowker, C.H., Strauss, D.: Products and sums in the category of frames. In: Binz, E. (ed.) Categorical Topology, Singer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 540, pp. 208–219. Springer, Berlin (1976)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Isbell, J.R.: Atomless parts of spaces. Math. Scand. 31, 5–32 (1972)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnstone, P.T.: Stone spaces. In: Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math., no. 3. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowen, R.: Approach spaces: a common supercategory of TOP and MET. Math. Nachr. 141, 183–226 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowen, R.: Approach spaces: the missing link in the topology–uniformity–metric triad. In: Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford, Oxford University Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowen, R., Sioen, M.: A note on separation in Ap. Appl. Gen. Topol. 4(2), 475–486 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pultr, A.: Frames. In: Hazewinkel, M. (ed.) Handbook of Algebra, vol. 3, chapter 4A, pp. 791–858. North Holland, Amsterdam (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Olmen, C.: Quotient Structures in Approach Frames (forthcoming)

  15. Van Olmen, C., Verwulgen, S.: Representing Approach Frames as the Eilenberg–Moore Algebras of Approach Spaces (submitted for publication)

  16. Vickers, S.: Topology via logic. In: Cambridge Tracts in Theor. Comp. Sci., vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Lowen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banaschewski, B., Lowen, R. & Van Olmen, C. Compact Hausdorff Approach Frames. Order 29, 105–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11083-011-9200-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11083-011-9200-x

Keywords

Navigation