Skip to main content
Log in

Study of multicast wavelength arrangement for maximizing network capacity in WDM networks with sparse wavelength converters

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of wavelength assignment is one of the most important factors that affect the capacity for the deployment of optical networks. This issue becomes more critical for multicast connections, especially when the network nodes have no wavelength conversion capability. Although the wavelength assignment can be more flexible if each node can perform wavelength conversion, the deployment cost increases accordingly. A compromise is to support a limited portion of conversion nodes in the WDM network. We propose a systematic approach for the wavelength assignment of multicast connections in WDM networks with sparse wavelength conversion nodes. The efficiency of the arrangement of wavelength is measured by its influences on the available capacity of the network and the consumption of wavelengths. By using the proposed approach, the Static Cost Greedy (SCG) algorithm [8] can be easily extended to be applicable in a Sparse Wavelength Conversion Network (SWCN). In addition, instead of SCG, the Minimum-Effect-First (MEF) algorithm is proposed to maximize the network capacity during wavelength assignment. We compare the performance of the proposed MEF methods with the extended SCG scheme through exhaustive simulations. The experimental results indicate that the proposed MEF schemes demonstrate much better performance than the SCG scheme. We also found that the performance is not always improved proportionally to the increment of the wavelength conversion nodes. The improvement reaches saturation when the number of conversion nodes is above 35% of the total number of nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Mukherjee B. (2000). WDM optical networks: progress and challenges. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. 18(10): 1810–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlamtac I., Ganz A. and Karmi G. (1992). Lightpath communications: a novel approach to high bandwidth optical WANs. IEEE Trans. Commun. 40(7): 1171–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahasrabuddhe L.H. and Mukherjee B. (1999). Light-trees: optical multicasting for improved performance in wavelength-routed networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 37(2): 67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramania S. and Barry R. (1997). Wavelength assignment in fixed routing WDM networks. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. 1: 406–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand J., Doverspike R. and Li G. (2001). Importance of wavelength conversion in an optical network. Opt. Netw. Mag. 2(3): 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam S., Azizoglu M. and Somani A.K. (1996). All-optical networks with sparse wavelength conversion. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 4(4): 544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B., Chu X.W. and Sohraby K. (2003). Routing and wavelength assignment vs wavelength converter placement in all-optical networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(8): S22–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J. and Chen B. (2003). Dynamic wavelength assignment for multicast in all-optical WDM networks to maximize the network capacity. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. 21(8): 1274–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K., Zang H. and Mukherjee B. (2003). A Comprehensive study on next-generation optical grooming switches. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. 21(7): 1173–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y., Rouskas G.N. and Perros H.G. (2000). A comparison of allocation policies in wavelength routing networks. Photon Netw. Comm. J. 2(3): 265–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B. and Wang J. (2002). Efficient routing and wavelength assignment for multicast in WDM networks. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. 20(1): 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia X., Du D., Hu X., Lee M. and Gu J. (2001). Optimization of wavelength assignment for QoS multicast in WDM networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 49(2): 341–350

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jia X., Hu X., Ruan L. and Sun J. (2002). Multicast routing, load balancing, and wavelength assignment on tree of rings. IEEE Commun. Lett. 6(2): 79–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poo G.-S. and Zhou Y. (2006). A new multicast wavelength assignment algorithm in wavelength-routed WDM networks. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. 24(4): 2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Poo, G.-S.: Multicast Wavelength Assignment for Sparse Wavelength Conversion in WDM Networks, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–10 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yen-Wen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YW., Peng, IH. Study of multicast wavelength arrangement for maximizing network capacity in WDM networks with sparse wavelength converters. Photon Netw Commun 15, 141–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-007-0098-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-007-0098-6

Keywords

Navigation