Skip to main content
Log in

Assembly admission control based on random packet selection at border nodes in Optical Burst-Switched networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Optical Burst-Switched (OBS) networks employing Just Enough Time (JET) signalling, Burst-Control Packets request resources at intermediate nodes following a one-way reservation protocol, that is, requested resources are not confirmed back to the source. Hence, data bursts are transmitted without any guarantees, and it sometimes occurs that these are dropped at a certain hop in the source–destination path, hence wasting resources at previous hops. This effect is specially harmful if some connections are abusing of the global shared resources, violating their respective Service Level Agreements, thus causing: (1) global performance degradation; and, (2) unfair service received by other connections. This article proposes “Random Packet Assembly Admission Control”, an admission control mechanism for OBS networks that moderates the two problems above. The mechanism monitors the network load status, detects which links are heavily loaded and decides which flows among the total traversing them require throughput decrease, on attempts to alleviate congestion and benefit other flows which are not abusing from the network. Such throughput decrease consists of preventive packet dropping during the assembly process at the ingress nodes of the OBS network, thus making no use of the network core. The numerical results show a substantial increase in the throughput experienced by well-behaved flows, and fundamental fairness achievement in the use of optical resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner J.: Terabit burst switching. J. High-Speed Netw. 8, 3–16 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verma S., Chaskar H., Ravikanth R.: Optical burst switching: a viable solution for Terabit IP backbone. IEEE Netw. 14, 48–53 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y., Qiao C., Yu X.: Optical burst switching: a new area in optical networking research. IEEE Netw. 18(3), 16–23 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoo, M., Qiao, C.: Just-enough time (JET): a high-speed protocol for bursty traffic in optical networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS Conference on Technologies for a Global Information Infrastructure 1997, pp. 26–27. August (1997)

  5. Widjaja I.: Performance analysis of burst admission-control protocols. IEE Proc. Commun. 142(1), 7–14 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoo M., Qiao C., Dixit S.: QoS performance of optical burst switching in IP over WDM networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 18, 2062–2071 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández J.A., Aracil J., de Pedro L., Reviriego P.: Analysis of blocking probability of data bursts with continuous-time variable offsets in single-wavelength OBS switches. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 26(12), 1559–1568 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barakat N., Sargent E.H.: Analytical modeling of offset-induced priority in multiclass OBS networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 53(8), 1343–1352 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan S.K., Mohan G., Chua K.C.: Feedback-based offset time selection for end-to-end proportional QoS provisioning in WDM optical burst switching networks. Compu. Commun. 30(4), 904–921 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y., Qiao C., Hamdi M., Tsang D.H.K.: Proportional differentiation: a scalable QoS approach. IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(6), 52–58 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazzez, A., El Fatmi, S.G., Boudriga, N., Obaidat, M.S.: A dynamic QoS-based scheme for admission control in OBS networks. In: Proceedings of the ICC 2007, pp. 449–454 (2007)

  12. Ge A., Callegati F., Tamil L.S.: On optical burst switching and self-similar traffic. IEEE Commun. Lett. 4(3), 98–100 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly F.P.: Blocking probabilities in large circuit-switched networks. Adv. Appl. Prob. 18, 473–505 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosberg, Z., Vu, H.L., Zukerman, M., White, J.: Blocking probabilities of optical burst switching networks based on reduced load fixed point approximations. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2003, vol. 3, pp. 2008–2018. San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2003

  15. Karagiannis, T., Molle, M., Faloutsos, M., Broido, A.: A nonstationary Poisson view of Internet traffic. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1558–1569. Honk Kong, PRC, March 2004

  16. Barry, R.A., Humblet, P.A.: Models of blocking probability in all-optical networks with and without wavelength changes. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM 1995, pp. 4a.1.1–4a.1.11. Boston, MA, USA (1995)

  17. Ross K.W.: Multiservice loss models for broadband telecommunication networks. Springer-Verlag, London (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitt W.: Blocking when service is required from several facilities simultaneously. ATT Tech. J. 64(8), 1807–1856 (1985)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. de Vega Rodrigo M., Remiche M.-A.: Planning OBS networks with QoS constraints. Photon. Netw. Commun. 14(2), 229–239 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Alberto Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reviriego, P., Hernández, J.A. & Aracil, J. Assembly admission control based on random packet selection at border nodes in Optical Burst-Switched networks. Photon Netw Commun 18, 39–48 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-008-0168-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-008-0168-4

Keywords

Navigation