Skip to main content
Log in

QoS-driven multicast routing in sparse-splitting optical networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the quality-of-service (QoS)-driven multicast routing problem in a sparse-splitting optical network. The main objective is to minimize the total cost of wavelength channels utilized by the light-tree while satisfying required QoS parameters. In this paper, both the optical-layer constraints (e.g., optical signal power) and application-layer requirements (e.g., end-to-end delay and inter-destination delay variation) are considered as the QoS parameters. First, integer linear programming (ILP) formulations to solve the optimal multicast routing problem with the given QoS parameters are presented. Solving the ILP formulations for large-scale networks can easily overwhelm the capabilities of state-of-the-art computing facilities, and hence, a heuristic algorithm is proposed to construct a feasible light-tree that satisfies the required QoS parameters in large-scale networks. Simulation results demonstrate the performance of the proposed heuristic algorithm in terms of the cost of utilized wavelength channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. If all the nodes are multicast capable, the network is said to be full splitting.

  2. In this paper, the cost is defined as the number of wavelength channel. It is important to minimize the number of utilized wavelength channel for a multicast session since the number of wavelength channel carried by each fiber is limited. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on constructing light-tree that minimizes the number of utilized wavelength channels required.

  3. It is the difference between the end-to-end delays among the paths from the source to any two destinations.

  4. In this paper, it is assumed that the processing and O/E/O conversion delay is negligible, and propagation delay is the dominate factor of end-to-end delay.

References

  1. Sahasrabuddhe, L., Mukherjee, B.: Light trees: optical multicasting for improved performance in wavelength routed networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 37(2), 67–73 (1999). doi:10.1109/35.747251

  2. Zhou, F., Molnar, M., Cousin, B.: Is light-tree structure optimal for multicast routing in sparse light splitting WDM networks? In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Computer Communications and, Networks (2009)

  3. Zhang, X., Wei, J., Qiao, C.: Constrained multicast routing in WDM networks with sparse light splitting. J. Lightwave Technol. 18, 1917–1927 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bathula, B., Vokkarane, V.: QoS-based manycasting over optical burst-switched (OBS) networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 18(1), 271–283 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, Q., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Yin, Z., Lin, L.: Multicast routing and wavelength assignment with delay constraint in WDM networks with sparse wavelength conversions. Photonic Netw. Commun. 19(2), 144–154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouskas, G., Baldine, I.: Multicast routing with end-to-end delay and delay variation constraints. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM 1996, vol. 1, pp. 353–360 (1996)

  7. Aissa, M., Ben Mnaouer, A., Murray, R., Youssef, H., Belghith, A.: A new scalable multicast routing algorithm for interactive real-time applications. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 15(8), 833–844 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Endoh, K., Yoshida, K., Yakoh, T.: Low delay live video streaming system for interactive use. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 13–16 (2008)

  9. Marshall, A., Yap, K.M., Yu, W.: Quality of service issues for distributed virtual environments with haptic interfaces. In: Proceedings of IEEE 10th Workshop on Multimedia, Signal Processing, pp. 40–45 (2008)

  10. Chaves, D., Carvalho, R., Pereira, H., Bastos-Filho, C., Martins-Filho, J.: Novel strategies for sparse regenerator placement in translucent optical networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 24(3), 237–251 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, I.S., Lin, T.C.: Performance assessment of multicast node placement for multicast routing in WDM networks with sparse light splitting. Photonic Netw. Commun. 16(2), 107–116 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali, M.: Optimization of splitting node placement in wavelength-routed optical networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 20(8), 1571–1579 (2002). doi:10.1109/JSAC.2002.803990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J., Yuan, J., Zhou, X., Yu, X.: A novel multicast routing algorithm in sparse splitting WDM network with power attenuation constraint. Photonic Netw. Commun. 19(2), 134–143 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan, S., Ali, M., Deogun, J.: Route optimization of multicast sessions in sparse light-splitting optical networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM ’01, pp. 2134–2138 (2001). doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2001.966158

  15. Yan, S., Deogun, J.S., Ali, M.: Routing in sparse splitting optical networks with multicast traffic. Comput. Netw. 41(1), 89–113 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Charbonneau, N., Vokkarane, V.: Static routing and wavelength assignment for multicast advance reservation in all-optical wavelength-routed WDM networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 20(1), 1–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, M.T., Lin, B., Tseng, S.S.: Multicast routing and wavelength assignment with delay constraints in wdm networks with heterogeneous capabilities. J. Netw. Comupt. Appl. 31(1), 47–65 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shuai, T., Ai, W.: New algorithms for multicast routing and wavelength assignment in multi-hop optical wdm networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 23, 53–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sreenath, N., Murthy, C.S.R.: Virtual source based multicast traffic routing in IP-over-WDM networks. J. High Speed Netw. 13(4), 265–281 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hsieh, Cheng-Yu C.Y., Liao, W.: All-optical multicast routing in sparse splitting WDM networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(6), 51–62 (2007). doi:10.1109/JSAC-OCN.2007.021305

  21. Park, J.W., Lim, H., Kim, J.: Virtual-node-based multicast routing and wavelength assignment in sparse-splitting optical networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 19(2), 182–191 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ali, M., Deogun, J.: Cost-effective implementation of multicasting in wavelength-routed networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 18(12), 1628–1638 (2000). doi:10.1109/50.908667

  23. Xin, Y., Rouskas, G.: Multicast routing under optical layer constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2004, vol. 4, pp. 2731–2742 (2004)

  24. Juttner, A., Szviatovski, B., Mecs, I., Rajko, Z.: Lagrange relaxation based method for the QoS routing problem. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, vol. 2, pp. 859–868 (2001)

  25. Waxman, B.: Routing of multipoint connections. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 6(9), 1617–1622 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ng, T.S.E., Zhang, H.: Predicting internet network distance with coordinates-based approaches. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM 2001 (2001)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2012R1A2A2A01014687). We also would like to appreciate the helpful discussion with Wanjun Huang and Prof. Andrea Fumagalli who are with Open Networking Advanced Research Laboratory, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, the University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ju-Won Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, JW., Kim, J. QoS-driven multicast routing in sparse-splitting optical networks. Photon Netw Commun 25, 178–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-013-0401-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-013-0401-7

Keywords

Navigation