Abstract
Quantum entanglement provides a contemporary secure channel for information communication, and the entanglement swapping builds newly entanglement on the previous isolate particles without direct interaction. In the paper, a novel-layered quantum communication path protocol cross multiple participants based on entanglement swapping is proposed, in which the communication path from sender to receiver across multiple intermediate nodes is constructed, and the constructed quantum channel is served for the information exchange. The present protocol can transmit message from sender to receiver via entanglement swapping. The presented protocol is useful for long-distance quantum information communication, significant to quantum network design and plan.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friis, N., Marty, O., Maier, C., Hempel, C., et al.: Observation of entangled states of a fully controlled 20-qubit system. Phys. Rev. X 8, 0212012 (2018)
Wang, X.L., Luo, Y.H., Huang, H.L., Chen, M.C., et al.: 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(260502), 1–8 (2018)
Heinosaari, T.: Simultaneous measurement of two quantum observables: compatibility, broadcasting, and in-between. Phys. Rev. A 93(4), 042118 (2016)
Haapasalo, E., Heinosaari, T., Miyadera, T.: The unavoidable information flow to environment in quantum measurements. J. Math. Phys. 59(8), 082106 (2017)
Ekert, A.K.: Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(6), 661 (1991)
Hou, K., Liu, G.-H., Zhang, X.-Y., Sheng, S.-Q.: An efficient scheme for five-party quantum state sharing of an arbitrary m-qubit state using multiqubit cluster states. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 205 (2017)
Hillery, M., Buzek, V., Berthiaume, A.: Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59(3), 1829–1834 (1999)
Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., Lo, H.K.: How to share a quantum secret. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(3), 648 (1999)
Liu, Z.H., Chen, H.W., Liu, W.J.: Cryptanalysis of controlled quantum secure direct communication and authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and quantum one-time pad. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(10), 4564–4576 (2016)
Du, Z., Li, L.: Robust high capability QKD-based database private query. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58(2), 391–398 (2019)
Du, G., Shang, T., Liu, J.: Quantum coordinated multi-point communication based on entanglement swapping. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 116 (2017)
Xu, L., Zhao, Z., Liu, J.: Quantum private comparison protocol based on the entanglement swapping between \(x+\) state and W-Class state. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 302 (2017)
Xie, C., Liu, Y., Xing, H., Chen, J., Zhang, Z.: Quantum correlation swapping. Quantum Inf. Process. 14(2), 653–679 (2015)
Wang, H., Zhang, Y.Q., Liu, X.F., Hu, Y.P.: Efficient quantum dialogue using entangled states and entanglement swapping without information leakage. Quantum Inf. Process. 15(6), 2593–2603 (2016)
Wang, D., Hoehn, R.D., Ye, L., Kais, S.: Efficient remote preparation of four-qubit cluster-type entangled states with multi-party over partially entangled channels. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 3454–3466 (2016)
Wang, Z.: Highly efficient remote preparation of an arbitrary three-qubit state via a four-qubit cluster state and an EPR state. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 1321–1334 (2013)
Zhan, Y., Ma, P.: Deterministic joint remote preparation of arbitrary two- and three-qubit entangled states. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 997–1009 (2013)
Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key distribution scheme. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032302 (2002)
Liu, Z.-H., Chene, H.-W.: Cryptanalysis and improvement of efficient quantum dialogue using entangled states and entanglement swapping without information leakage. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 229 (2017)
Su, X., Tian, C., Deng, X., Li, Q., et al.: Quantum entanglement swapping between two multipartite entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(240503), 1–5 (2016)
Zhan, Y., Fu, H., Li, W., Ma, P.: Deterministic remote preparation of a four-qubit cluster-type entangled state. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 2615–2622 (2013)
Choudhury, B.S., Samanta, S.: Perfect joint remote state preparation of arbitrary six-qubit cluster-type states. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 175 (2018)
Ma, P.-C., Chen, G.-B., Li, X.-W., Zhan, Y.-B.: Asymmetric bidirectional controlled remote preparation of an arbitrary four-qubit cluster-type state and a single-qubit state. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 308 (2017)
Shukla, C., Thapliyal, K., Pathak, A.: Hierarchical joint remote state preparation in noisy environment. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 205 (2017)
Zhang, Z.-H., Shu, L., Mo, Z.-W., Zheng, J., Ma, S.-Y., Luo, M.-X.: Joint remote state preparation between multi-sender and multi-receiver. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 205 (2017)
Wang, D., Ye, L.: Joint remote preparation of a class of four-qubit cluster-like states with tripartite entanglements and positive operator-valued measurements. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52(9), 3075–3085 (2013)
Devetak, I., Berger, T.: Low-entanglement remote state preparation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177901 (2001)
Zeng, B., Zhang, P.: Remote-state preparation in higher dimension and the parallelizable manifold \(S^{n-1}\). Phys. Rev. A 65, 022316 (2002)
Berry, D.W., Sanders, B.C.: Optimal remote state preparation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027901 (2003)
Kurucz, Z., Adam, P., Janszky, J.: General criterion for oblivious remote state preparation. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062301 (2006)
Hughes, R.J., Nordholt, J.E., Derkacs, D.: Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night. New J. Phys. 4(1), 3283–3286 (2002)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61672279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, Z., Li, X. A layered quantum communication path protocol cross multiple participants based on entanglement swapping. Quantum Inf Process 18, 226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2336-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2336-0