Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of Felsenstein's “Phylogenies and the comparative method” on evolutionary biology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Felsenstein’s (1985) method of phylogenetic independent contrasts is probably the most commonly used technique in evolutionary biology to study adaptation of organisms to their environment, taking phylogeny into account. Here, we performed a scientometric evaluation of all 1462 articles that cited Felsenstein (1985) between 1985 and 2002, in order to analyze the impact of his comparative method on the evolutionary research program and what has been done since it. We found that Felsentein’s (1985) article can be classified as a “hot paper” or a breakthrough contribution, since it was the most cited article from The American Naturalist published in 1985. Also, it can be considered as a “citation classic”, since it is the third more cited paper in The American Naturalist from 1945 to 2002. In general, papers that cited Felsenstein (1985) were published in high-impact journals, and most of them are theoretical articles indicating that biologists are aware of statistical and conceptual problems in dealing with comparative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carvalho, P., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Bini, L. The impact of Felsenstein's “Phylogenies and the comparative method” on evolutionary biology. Scientometrics 62, 53–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0003-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0003-y

Keywords

Navigation