Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A bibliometric analysis of the effectiveness of Korea’s Biotechnology Stimulation Plans, with a comparison with four other Asian nations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the scientific output and publication patterns of Korean biotechnology before and after the start of the Korean Biotechnology Stimulation Plans (1994–2007), and then compares the results with publication data from the same time periods for Japan, the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Singapore. For this study, 14,704 publications, published by at least one researcher from one of the five Asian nations (indexed by SCI Expanded during the years 1990–1993 and the years 2000–2003), were considered. A marked increase of Korean research output in biotechnology was largely influenced by an increasing tendency for researchers to enter the field of biotechnology and by increased expenditures for R&D activity through the Korean Biotechnology Stimulation Plans. In addition, the SCI Expanded coverage of national journals affected the scientific output and publication patterns of Japanese and Korean researchers. Looking at the Korean publications by collaboration type, international collaboration leads to more publications in mainstream journals of high impact factors than local and domestic collaborations for the two periods. However, although the Korean Biotechnology Stimulation Plans were followed by a remarkable increase in South Korea’s research output, this increase has not been accompanied by growth in the quality of those publications in terms of impact factors of journals for Korean publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnum, S. R., Biotechnology: An Introduction, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York, 1998. p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnum, S. R., Biotechnology: An Introduction, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York, 1998. p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A New Impetus for European Biotechnology: Bringing Coherence to EU Biotechnology Policies, Brussels, Belgium: European Union, 2004, Available at http://www.eurunion.org/news/press/2004/20040059.htm [Retrieved on 1 July 2005].

  4. A Survey of the Use of Biotechnology in U.S. Industry, Washington D.C.: Technology Administration and Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2003, Available at www.technology.gov/reports/Biotechnology/CD120a_0310.pdf [Retrieved on 1 July 2005].

  5. Planning for Biotechnology Development Action, Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Science & Technology of Korea, 2004, Available at http://www.most.go.kr/most/ (In Korean) [Retrieved on 1 July 2005].

  6. Banerjee, P., Gupta, B. M., Garg, K. C., Patent statistics as indicators of competition: An analysis of patenting in biotechnology, Scientometrics, 47(1) (2000) 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramani, S., de Looze, M., Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K., Scientometrics, 54(3) (2002) 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nederhof, A. J., Changes in publication patterns of biotechnologists: An evaluation of the impact of government stimulation programs in six industrial nations, Scientometrics, 14(5/6) (1988) 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewison, G., Publications from the European Community’s Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multinationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations, Scientometrics, 31(2) (1994) 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Science Citation Index Expanded 1990–1993, 2000–2003 (Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information).

  11. Kim, M. J., Kim, B., A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992–1998, Journal of Information Science, 26(2) (2000) 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, M. J., Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000, Scientometrics, 63(2) (2005) 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frame, J. D., Carpenter, M. P., International research collaboration, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schubert, A., Braun, T., International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 19(1/2) (1990) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glänzel, W., National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51(1) (2001) 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Library and Information Science, Jeonju University, Jeonju, South Korea

    Mee-Jean Kim

Authors
  1. Mee-Jean Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mee-Jean Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, MJ. A bibliometric analysis of the effectiveness of Korea’s Biotechnology Stimulation Plans, with a comparison with four other Asian nations. Scientometrics 72, 371–388 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-1585-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-1585-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation