Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilities for encountering genius, basic, ordinary or insignificant papers based on the cumulative nth citation distribution

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article calculates probabilities for the occurrence of different types of papers such as genius papers, basic papers, ordinary papers or insignificant papers. The basis of these calculations are the formulae for the cumulative nth citation distribution, being the cumulative distribution of times at which articles receive their nth(n = 1,2,3,...) citation.

These formulae (proved in previous papers) are extended to allow for different aging rates of the papers. These new results are then used to define different importance classes of papers according to the different values of n, in function of time t. Examples are given in case of a classification into four parts: genius papers, basic papers, ordinary papers and (almost) insignificant papers.

The fact that, in these examples, the size of each class is inversely related to the importance of the journals in this class is proved in a general mathematical context in which we have an arbitrary number of classes and where the threshold values of n in each class are defined according to the natural law of Weber-Fechner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003), Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3): 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2001), Stochastic modelling of the first-citation distribution. Scientometrics, 52(1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2002), The nth-citation distribution and obsolescence. Scientometrics, 53(3): 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2005), Are “Sleeping Beauties” to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3): 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2000), A heuristic study of the first-citation distribution. Scientometrics, 48(3): 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2005), Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics. Elsevier, Oxford (UK), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., I. K. Ravichandra Rao (2001), Theory of first-citation distributions and applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 34: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (1992), On some stopping times of citation processes. From theory to indicators. Information Processing and Management, 28(1): 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., B. Schlemmer, B. Thijs (2003), Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3): 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1994), Double exponential models for first-citation processes. Scientometrics, 30(1): 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004), Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3): 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Egghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egghe, L. Probabilities for encountering genius, basic, ordinary or insignificant papers based on the cumulative nth citation distribution. Scientometrics 70, 167–181 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0110-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0110-z

Keywords

Navigation