Abstract
The aim of this study is to reveal the research growth, the distribution of research productivity and impact of genetic engineering research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan by taking patent bibliometrics approach. This study uses quantitative methods adopt from bibliometrics to analyze the patents granted to Japan, Korea and Taiwan by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) from 1991 to 2002. In addition to patent and citation count, Bradford’s Law is applied to identify core assignees in genetic engineering. Patent coupling approach is taken to further analyze the patents granted to the core assignees to enclose the correlations among the core assignees.
13,055 genetic engineering patents were granted during the period of 1991 to 2002. Japan, Korea and Taiwan own 841 patents and Japan owns most of them. 270 assignees shared 841 patents and 16 core assignees are identified by the Bradford’s Law. 18,490 patents were cited by the 13,055 patents and 1,146 out of the 18,490 cited patents were granted to Japan, Korea and Taiwan. The results show Japan performs best in productivity and research impact among three countries. The core assignees are also Japan based institutions and four technical clusters are identified by patent coupling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, A., Plaza, L. M. (2004), The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish public R&D system to the productive sectors in the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(1): 3–14.
Allen, J. Oppenheim, C. (1979). The overlap of US and Canadian patents literature with journal literature. World Patent Information, 1(2): 77–80.
Banerjee, P., Gupta, B. M., Garg, K. C. (2000), Patent statistics as indicators of competition: an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1): 95–116.
Bellardo, T. (1980), The use of co-citations to study science. Library Research, 2(3): 231–237.
Cawkell, A. E. (1976), Understanding science by analyzing its literature. The Information Scientist, 10(1): 3–10.
Demidowicz, B. K., Oppenheim, C. (1981), The overlap of patent and journal literature on animal feedstuffs. World Patent Information, 3: 82–83.
Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Eisenschitz, T. S., Lazard, A. M., Willey, C. J. (1986), Patent groups and their relationship with journal literature. Journal of Information Science, 12: 53–58.
Eisenschitz, T. S., McKie, L. J., Warne, K. (1989), Communication of information in U.S. biotechnology patents. World Patent Information, 11(1): 28–32.
Garfield, E. (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and the Humanities. New York: Wiley.
Garfield, E. (1980), Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Current Contents, 19: 5–12.
Garfield, E. (1998), From citation indexes to informetrics: is the tail now wagging the dog? Libri, 48: 67–80.
Karki, M. M. S. (1997), Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 33(4): 269–272.
Kessler, M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14: 10–25.
Lo, Szu-Chia (2004), A Study of the Productivity of Genetic Engineering Research from 1991 to 2002 Using the Patentometrics Approach. International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Fifth COLLNET Meeting, Roorkee, India.
Lopez-Munoz, F., Alamo, C., Rubio, G., Garcia-Garcia, P., Martin-Agueda, B., Cuenca, E. (2003), Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980–2000. Depression and Anxiety, 18(2): 95–103.
Moed, H. F. (2000), Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies. Scientometrics, 47(2): 323–346.
Narin, F. (1994), Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1): 147–155.
Narin, F. (1995), Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics, 34(3): 489–496.
Narin, F., Moll, J. K. (1977), Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 12: 35–58.
Narin, F., Olivastro, D., Stevens, K. A. (1994), Bibliometric/theory practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1): 65–76.
Price, D. J. De Solla (1965), Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683): 510–515.
Ramani, S. V., De Looze, M.-A. (2002), Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sector: an application to France, Germany and the U.K. Scientometrics, 54(3): 319–346.
Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(3): 265–269.
Walker, R. D. (1995), Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature, Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press.
Weinberg, B. H. (1974), Bibliographic coupling: a review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5/6): 189–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lo, Sc. Patent analysis of genetic engineering research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Scientometrics 70, 183–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0111-y
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0111-y