Abstract
In this pilot study we examine the performance of text-based profiling in recovering a set of validated inventor-author links. In a first step we match patents and publications solely based on their similarity in content. Next, we compare inventor and author names on the highest ranked matches for the occurrence of name matches. Finally, we compare these candidate matches with the names listed in a validated set of inventor-author names. Our text-based profile methodology performs significantly better than a random matching of patents and publications, suggesting that text-based profiling is a valuable complementary tool to the name searches used in previous studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassecoulard, E., Zitt, M. (2004), Patents and publications: The lexical connection, In: Moed et al. (2004) pp. 665–694.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1997), Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., Thijs, B. (2006), Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68:457–473.
Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., De Moor, B. (2005), Combining full-text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines, Information Processing and Management, 41(6):1548–1572.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U. (1998), Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy, 27:835–851.
Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., Utecht, J. T. (2003), Toward hybrid Triple Helix indicators — A study of university related patents and a survey of inventors, Scientometrics, 58(2):321–350.
Meyer, M. (2005), Inventor-Authors: Knowledge Integrators or Weak Links? An Exploratory Comparison of Co-active Inventing Peers in Nano-science and Technology, Working Paper 2005/1, Helsinki University of Technology, mimeo.
Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds) (2004), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Noyons, E. C. M., Van Raan, A. F. J., Grupp, H., U. Schmoch (1994), Exploring the science and technology interface — inventor author relations in laser medicine, Research Policy, 23(4):443–457.
Porter M. F. (1980), An algorithm for suffix stripping, Program, 14(3):130–137.
Rabeharisoa, V. (1992), A special mediation between science and technology: when inventors publish scientific articles in fuel cells. In: Grupp, H. Dynamics of Science-based Innovation, Berlin: Springer, pp. 45–72.
Rapmund, A., Gulbrandsen, M., Iversen, E. J. (2004), Academic Patenting in Norway, mimeo.
Schmoch, U. (2004), The technological output of scientific institutions. In: Moed et al. (2004) pp. 717–731.
Van Looy, B. M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. (2006), Scientific and Entrepreneurial activities within Academia: Mutually reinforcing, hampering or just co-existing? Research Policy, (forthcoming).
Verbeek, A., Andries, P., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Veugelers, R. (2002), Linking Science to Technology, Bibliographic References in Patents — Science and Technology Interplay: Policy Relevant Findings and Interpretations, European Commission, Brussels, EUR 20492, Vol. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cassiman, B., Glenisson, P. & Van Looy, B. Measuring industry-science links through inventor-author relations: A profiling methodology. Scientometrics 70, 379–391 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0208-3
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0208-3