Skip to main content
Log in

Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a scientometric analysis of nanoscale research in South Africa during the period 2000–2005. The ISI databases were identified as the most appropriate information platform for the objectives of the investigation and have been interrogated for the identification of South African authors publishing in the field.

The article identifies trends over time, major institutional contributors, journals in which South African authors publish their research, international collaborators and performance in comparison to four comparator countries (India, Brazil, South Korea and Australia). The major findings of the investigation are as follows: nanoscale research in South Africa is driven by individual researchers interests up to date and it is in its early stages of development; the country’s nanoscale research is below what would one expect in light of its overall publication output; the country’s nano-research is distributed to a number of Universities with subcritical concentration of researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J. (2004), Military uses of nanotechnology: Perspectives and concerns, Security Dialogue, 35(1): 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Schubert, S., Zsindely, S. (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38(2): 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastidar, P. G., Ramachandran, S. (2005), Engineering research in ocean sector: An international profile, Scientometrics, 65(2): 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DST (2005), National Nanotechnology Strategy, Department of Science and Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., He, Y. (2005), Comparison and evaluation of domestic and international outputs in Information Science & Technology research in China, Scientometrics, 65(2): 215–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullmann, A., Meyer, M. (2003), Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58(3): 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Scientific Information. (2001), Nanotechnology, ISI Essential Science Indicators, Special Topics, Retrieved November 2005, from http://esi-topics.com/nano.

  • Ma, N., Guan, J. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 65(3): 343–355.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Macoubrie, J. (2005), Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government, Retrieved December 2005, from www.wilsoncenter.org.

  • Malsch, I. (1997), Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts’ Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Subareas, Seville, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Persson, O., Power, Y. (2001). Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data, Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies. Retrieved November 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/era/pdf/nanoexpertgroupreport.pdf.

  • Pouris, A. (2003), South Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years, South African Journal of Science, 99: 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojo, R., Gomez, I. (2005), Analysis of the Spanish scientific and technological output in the ICT sector, Scientometrics, 66(1): 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004), Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59(3): 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Yochai, W., Saechiew, M. (2005), An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study, Scientometrics, 65(3): 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, A. E., Seal, S., Vaidyanathan, P. (2003), The promises and perils of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Exploring emerging social and ethical issues, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4): 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weckert, J. (2001), The control of scientific research: The case of nanotechnology, Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 3: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastassios Pouris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pouris, A. Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics 70, 541–553 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0301-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0301-7

Keywords

Navigation