Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The applicability of Hirsch’s h index (Hirsch, 2005) for evaluating scientific research in Spain has been investigated. A series of derivative indexes that take into account: i) the overall low scientific production in Spain before the’ 80s; ii) differences among areas due to size (overall number of citations for publications in a given area); and iii) the number of authors, are suggested. Their applicability has been tested for two different areas in the Biological Sciences. The proposed set of indexes accurately summarizes both the success and evolution of scientists’ careers in Spain, and it may be useful in the evaluation of other not well established national scientific research systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, M., Mabe, M. (2000), Impact factors: use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, No. 1. Elsevier Science. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/editorsinfo.editors/perspectives

  • Ball, P. (2005), Index aims for ranking scientists. Nature, 436: 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista, P. D., Campitelli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., Martinez, A. S. (2006), Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1): 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. D. (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65: 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2005), A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist, 19(22): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1): 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1994), The ISI impact factor. Current Contents. June 20. http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor

  • Hecht, F., Hecht, B. K., Sandberg, A. A. (1998), The journal “impact factor”: a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 104: 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102: 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Contreras, E., de Moya Anegón, F., Delgado López-Cozar, E. (2003), The evolution of research activity in Spain. The impact of the National Commission for the evaluation of research activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, 32: 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, A. (2004), Is peer review in crisis? Perspectives in Publishing, No. 2. Elsevier Science. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/editorsinfo.editors/perspectives

  • Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (1994), La reforma de la Universidad española. Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, 20: 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 497–507.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imperial, J., Rodríguez-Navarro, A. Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics 71, 271–282 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1665-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1665-4

Keywords

Navigation