Skip to main content
Log in

Low awareness of the link between science and innovation affects public policies in developing countries: The Chilean case

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing countries share disbelief about the benefits of the endogenous production of science as a tool for economical growth. Hence, public policies to strengthen science and technology and promote the culture of innovation are, in general, weak and sometimes incoherent.

Patenting has become not only an icon to protect discoveries which can yield profits and enable socio-economical growth but also a potent informetric tool to assess innovation and certainly, since the seminal work of Narin, to understand the multidimensional interactions between science, technology and innovation.

In this article we examine the impact of Chilean research articles on world technology as viewed by the link between articles produced in Chile and US patents. Our results show that from 1987 to 2003, 509 US patents had 562 citations to 273 articles produced at least, by one author working in a Chilean institution. US, not Chilean companies are the holders of patents citing Chilean produced articles. The research articles covered many disciplines but a clear concentration occurred in the biomedical field. Additionally, chemistry was also well cited.

Our results confirm that in Chile a non-patenting culture which involves researchers and institutions still prevails. Hence, public policies need to be designed and implemented to foster scientific production and innovation in order to advance progress in the current knowledge-economy-driven society which sustains competitiveness in the globalized world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atallah, G., Rodriguez, G. (2006), Indirect patent citations, Scientometrics, 67: 437–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavente, J. M. (2005), Innovación Tecnológica en Chile: Dónde estamos y qué se puede hacer, Economia Chilena, 8: 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, J. (2005), The Ghosts of Stanford. Have federal constraints on reimbursing overhead for research grants gone too far? Chronicle of Higher Education 51: A16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M., Narin, F. (1980), Linkage between basic research and patents, Research Management, 23: 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Puttitanun, T. (2005), Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries, Journal of Development Economics, 79: 474–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyzaguirre, B., Foulon, C. L, Hinzpeter, X. (2000), Los Chilenos no entendem os lo que leemos. Puntos de Referencia. Centro de Estudios Públicos, Santiago, Chile, July 2000.

  • Gupta, V. K. (2006), References to literature in patent documents: A case study of CSIR in India, Scientometrics, 68: 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, E. J. (2000), An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting, Scientometrics, 49: 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauskopf, M. (2003), Indicadores cuantitativos de los doctorados conferidos en el país ¿Falta de atención o expression de subdesarrollo? In: Calidad en la Educación, Estudios de Postgrado. Perspectivas y desafios. CSE, Santiago, pp. 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, B. (2005), La Moda de las Patentes, Bioplanet, 34: 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2000), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49: 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2006a), Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy, Scientometrics, 66: 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2006b), Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology, Scientometrics, 69: 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Pereira, T. S., Persson, O., Granstrand, O. (2004), The scientometric world of Keith Pavitt. A tribute to his contributions to research policy and patent analysis, Research Policy, 33: 1405–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., Olivastro, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Noma, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7: 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokman, M., Zahler, A. (2004), Innovación para un crecimiento sostenido: Siete lecciones para Chile, En Foco, 17: Expansiva, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussen, R. J. W., Buter, R. K., Van Leeuwen, Th. N. (2000), Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47: 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Krauskopf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krauskopf, M., Krauskopf, E. & Méndez, B. Low awareness of the link between science and innovation affects public policies in developing countries: The Chilean case. Scientometrics 72, 93–103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1737-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1737-5

Keywords

Navigation