Skip to main content
Log in

Who’s who and what’s what in Brazilian Public Health Sciences

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The present study endeavours to provide information on what are the research interests of Brazilian Public Health and how authors can be ranked.

Methods

Post-graduate faculty members ISI data are analysed according to regions. Number of paper and its citations, papers’ type-complexity-cooperation, Bradford’s Law, Shannon’s indexes, time dynamic functions, Lotka’s Law, and ranking functions are examined.

Results

Current production was built up in the last 30 years at a rate of 9.6% articles/year and 12.6% citations/year. 66% of potential authors were present in ISI data records, 64% achieved at least one citation. Research fields do not much depart from the traditional PH purview. More than 66% of authors have just one paper and decrease is steep. Subtle differences call attention to the South region.

Conclusion

Brazilian PH is mainly committed to classical research fields and ranking among authors is narrow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pereira, J. C. R., Escuder, M. M. L., The scenario of Brazilian Health Sciences in the period of 1981 to 1995. Scientometrics, 45(1) (1999) 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pereira, J. C. R., Baltar, V. L., Mello, D. L., National Health Innovation System: relations between scientific fields and economic sectors. Rev. Saude Publ., 38(1) (2004) 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Macías-Chapula, C. A., Hacia un modelo de comunicación en salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica, 18(6) (2005) 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barros, A. J. D., Scientific output in the collective health area: journal profile and evaluation by CAPES. Rev. Saude Publ., 40 (N Esp) (2006) 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford, S. C., Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137 (1934) 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shannon, C. E., A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (1948) 379–423 & 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lotka, A. J., The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12) (1926) 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glänzel, W., Leta, J., Thijs, B., Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1) (2006) 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegel, S., Castellan, Jr. N. J., Nonparametric Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cunha-Melo, J. R., Santos, G. C., Andrade MV. Brazilian medical publications: citation patterns for Brazian-edited and non-Brazilian literature. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 39 (2006) 997–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Júlio Cesar Rodrigues Pereira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pereira, J.C.R., Vasconcellos, J.P., Furusawa, L. et al. Who’s who and what’s what in Brazilian Public Health Sciences. Scientometrics 73, 37–52 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1787-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1787-8

Keywords

Navigation