Skip to main content
Log in

Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deals with the role of internationally co-authored papers (co-publications). Specifically, we compare, within a data-set of German research units, citation and co-publication indicators as a proxy for the unobserved quality dimension of scientific research. In that course we will also deal with the question whether both citations and co-publications are considerably related. Our results suggest that, although there is a strong partial correlation between citations and co-publications within a multivariate setting, we cannot use reasonably normalised co-publication indicators as an alternative proxy for quality. Thus, concerning quality assessment, there remains a primer on citation analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., Black, C. G., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaboration: Evidence from U.S. universities 1981–1999, Research Policy, 34: 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D., Taxt, R. (2004), Peer review and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university, Research Evaluation, 13(1): 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004), Science of Science and Reflexivity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Lee, S. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Science Studies, 35(5): 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., Cole, S. (1971), Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the Science Citation Index, The American Sociologist, 6(23): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1989), Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, p. 9 ff.

  • Cozzens, S. (1989), What do citations count? The rhetorical-first model, Scientometrics, 15: 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H.-D. (2001), Wissenschaftsevaluation. Center for Science and Technology Studies, CEST, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb. Beaver, D., Rosen, R. (1978), Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The Professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 1: 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb. Beaver D. (2001), Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future, Scientiometrics, 52(3): 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. (1977), Referencing as persuasion, Social Science Studies, 17: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001), National characteristics in international and scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51(1): 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., De Lange, C. (2002), A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 54: 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry, Scientometrics, 50(2): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004), Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. (2000), Econometrics. Princeton University Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, M. (2006), Leistungsorientierte Budgetierung: Analyse der Umsetzung an ausgewählten Universitäten und Fakultäten/Fachbereichen, Hochschulinformationsystem A1/2006.

  • Jansen, D., Wald, A., Franke, K., Schmoch, U., Schubert, T. (2007), Third party research funding and performance in research. On the effects of institutional conditions on research performance of teams, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 59: 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korevaar, J., Moed, H. (1996), Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics, Scientometrics, 37(1): 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruytbosch, C.-E. (1989), The role and effectiveness of peer review. In: David Evered and Sara Harnett (Eds), The evaluation of Scientific Research. Chichester UK, Wiley, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002), What do we measure by co-authorship, Research Evaluation, 11: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., Wolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1979), Foreword. In: E. Garfield (Ed.), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, vii-xi. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005), Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, Information Science and Knowledge Managemen., Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhoff, A.-J. (1988), The validity and reliability of evaluation of scholarly performance. In: Van Raan, A. F. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinia. E., Van Leeuwen, T., Van Vuren, H., Van Raan, A. (1998), Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands, Research Policy, 27: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, P.-M., Baumert, J., Naumann, J., Trommer, L. (1988), Institutionelle Bedingungen wissenschaftlicher Produktivität. In: DANIEL, H.-D., FISCH, R. (Eds), Evaluation von Forschung. Universitäts-Verlag, Konstanz, pp. 457–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. (2005), Leistungsfähigkeit und Strukturen der Wissenschaft im Internationalen Vergleich 2004, Bericht zur Technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit, Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 6-2005, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

  • Travis, G. D. L., Collins, H. M. (1991), New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16: 322–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2003), Wissenschaftssoziologie, Themen der Soziologie. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.

  • Weingart, P. (2005), Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62: 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woulters, P. (1997), Citation cycles and peer review cyles, Scientometrics, 38(1): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Schubert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmoch, U., Schubert, T. Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?. Scientometrics 74, 361–377 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1818-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1818-5

Keywords

Navigation