Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Highly cited articles are interesting because of the potential association between high citation counts and high quality research. This study investigates the 82 most highly cited Information Science and Library Science’ (IS&LS) articles (the top 0.1%) in the Web of Science from the perspectives of disciplinarity, annual citation patterns, and first author citation profiles. First, the relative frequency of these 82 articles was much lower for articles solely in IS&LS than for those in IS&LS and at least one other subject, suggesting that that the promotion of interdisciplinary research in IS&LS may be conducive to improving research quality. Second, two thirds of the first authors had an h-index in IS&LS of less than eight, show that much significant research is produced by researchers without a high overall IS&LS research productivity. Third, there is a moderate correlation (0.46) between citation ranking and the number of years between peak year and year of publication. This indicates that high quality ideas and methods in IS&LS often are deployed many years after being published.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (2005), Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics, 63(3): 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003), Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3): 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aversa, E. S. (1985), Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging — a study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3–6): 383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O. (2006), Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1): 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2007), What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1): 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2005), Are “sleeping beauties” to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3): 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, V., Lind, N. C. (1991), Citation life-cycles of 10 citation-classics. Scientometrics, 22(2): 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, A. (2003), Some bibliographic practices in interdisciplinary work: Accounting for citations in library and information sciences. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 10(1): 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Meho, L. (2007), Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Meho, L. (2006), Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9): 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E (1975), The ‘obliteration phenomenon’ in science — and the advantage of being obliterated! Current Contents, (51/52): 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1980), Premature discovery or delayed recognition — Why? Current Contents, (26): 5–10.

  • Garfield, E. (1985a), The articles most cited in the SCI from 1961 to 1982. 7. Another 100 citation-classics — the Watson-Crick double helix has its turn. Current Contents, (20): 3–12.

  • Garfield, E. (1985b), The articles most cited in the SCI from 1961 to 1982. 8. Ninety-eight more classic papers from unimolecular reaction velocities to natural opiates — the changing frontiers of science. Current Contents, (33): 3–11.

  • Garfield, E. (1993), From obliteration to immortality. Current Contents, (45): 391–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Garfield, E. (2005), The myth of delayed recognition. The Scientist, 18(11): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Thijs, B. (2003), Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3): 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46): 16569-16572.

  • Levitt, J. M., Thelwall, M. (2007), A typical citation patterns in the twenty most highly cited documents in Library and Information Science. Proceedings International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics: 11th, Madrid (Spain).

  • Merton, R. K. (1968), On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T., Spencer, J. (1996), A citation analysis study of library science: Who cites librarians? College and Research Libraries, 57(1): 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, C. (2007), Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2): 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., Perreault, M. (2007) Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1): 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., CRAWFORD, G. A. (1992), Analysis of citations between communication and library and information science articles. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, pp. 8–12.

  • Tang, R. (2004a), Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting, (1) 2004, pp. 54–63.

  • Tang, R. (2004b), Visualizing interdisciplinary citations to and from information and library science publications. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, Proceedings, pp. 972–977.

  • Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K. (2005), Signals in science - On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics, 64(2): 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004), Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3): 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006), Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3): 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E. (2005), Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation. Scientometrics, 63(2): 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1SB, UK

    Jonathan M. Levitt & Mike Thelwall

Authors
  1. Jonathan M. Levitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Thelwall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Levitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levitt, J.M., Thelwall, M. The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics 78, 45–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation