Skip to main content
Log in

Patent coupling analysis of primary organizations in genetic engineering research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the possible linkage among the 40 primary organizations in Genetic Engineering Research by taking the Patent Coupling approach. The primary organizations were defined by the productivity and identified by the patent count and Bradford Law. The author analyzed the cited patents of the patents granted by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) from 1991 to 2002 to the 40 primary organizations (assignees) in Genetics Engineering Research to establish the correlation.

780 coupling pairs formed by the 40 primary organizations and Coupling Index and Coupling Strength were calculated for each pair and primary organization. Correlation Analysis and Multiple-Dimension Scaling were applied further based on Coupling Index. Technological clusters were found in the results of the analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, A., Plaza, L. M. (2004), The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish public R & D system to the productive sectors in the field of biotechnology. Scientomeric, 59(1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, P., Gupta, B. M., Garg, K. C. (2000), Patent statistics as indicators of competition: an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1): 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellardo, T. (1980), The use of co-citations to study science. Library Research, 2(3): 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M., Narin, F. (1980), Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management, 23: 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawkell, A. E. (1976), Understanding science by analyzing its literature. The Information Scientist, 10(1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P., Wyatt, S. (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literatures. Research Policy, 17: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1990), Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, F. (1998), From citation indexes to informetrics: is the tail now wagging the dog? Libri, 48: 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (1998), Scientometric study of laser patent literature. Scientometrics, 43(3): 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Mu-hsuan, Chiang, Li-yun, Chen, Dar-zen (2003), Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: a study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3): 489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., Fogarty, M. S., Banks, B. A. (1997), Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation (NBER Working Paper 6044). NBER, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14: 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1965), Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16(3): 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Szu-chia (2004), A Study of the Productivity of Genetic Engineering Research from 1991 to 2002 Using the Patentometrics Approach. Paper presented at International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Fifth COLLNET Meeting, Roorkee, India.

  • Lo, Szu-chia, Huang, Mu-shuan (2005), Research impact on genetic engineering research: patent citation analysis. Poster presented at 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Post Session, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshakova, I. V. (1979), Citation networks in information science. Scientometrics, 3(1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2000), Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies. Scientometrics, 47(2): 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1994), Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1): 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1995), Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics, 34(3): 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1999), The Biotech Century: how genetic commerce will change the world. Phoenix, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(3): 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viannen, B. G. Van, Moed, H. F., Raan, A. F. J. Van (1990), An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Science Policy, 19: 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, B. H. (1974), Bibliographic coupling: a review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5/6): 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szu-Chia Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lo, SC. Patent coupling analysis of primary organizations in genetic engineering research. Scientometrics 74, 143–151 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0110-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0110-7

Keywords

Navigation