Abstract
I offer insight into the principles by which the salaries of Italian Renaissance professors were determined. There is a longstanding fascination with the fact that some professors during the Renaissance had extremely high salaries. It has been suggested that at the top of the salary scale were the superstars, professors who could attract many students and raise the prestige of the university. Through an analysis of data on the salaries of professors at Padua in 1422–1423, I argue that much of the differences in salaries can be explained in terms of the stage of career of professors. Those professors who have taught the longest tend to be paid the most. Hence, there is little evidence for the superstar thesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biagioli, M. (1989), The social status of italian mathematicians, 1450–1600, History of Science, 27: 41–95.
Biagioli, M. (1993), Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burckhardt, J. (1860/1990), The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. by S. G. C. Middlemore, with a new Introduction by P. Burke and notes by P. Murray. London: Penguin Books.
Grendler, P. F. (2002), The Universities of the Italian Renaissance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Westfall, R. S. (1985/1997), Science and patronage: Galileo and the telescope, in P. Dear (Ed.) The Scientific Enterprise in Early Modern Europe: Readings from Isis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–132.
Wyatt, M. (2004), Review of P. F. Grendler’s The Universities of the Italian Renaissance, University of Toronto Quarterly, 74: 393–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brad Wray, K. The salaries of Italian Renaissance professors. Scientometrics 80, 351–357 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2073-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2073-0