Skip to main content
Log in

A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two broad classes of scientific impact indices are proposed and their properties - both theoretical and practical — are discussed. These new classes were obtained as a geometric generalization of the well-known tools applied in scientometric, like Hirsch’s h-index, Woeginger’s w-index and the Kosmulski’s Maxprod. It is shown how to apply the suggested indices for estimation of the shape of the citation function or the total number of citations of an individual. Additionally, a new efficient and simple O(log n) algorithm for computing the h-index is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46) (2005) 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Ball, Index aims for fail ranking of scientists, Nature, 436 (2005) p. 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Glänzel, On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index, Science Focus, 1(1) (2006) 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Proń, H. Szatyłowicz, Habilitacja dodaje „skrzyde?”?, Forum Akademickie, 3 (2006) (In Polish).

  5. C. D. Kelly, M. D. Jennions, The h-index and career assessment by numbers, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4) (2006) 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Bornmann, H. D. Daniel, What do we know about the h-index?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9) (2007) 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. G. Banks, An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds, Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. F. J. Van Raan, Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups, Scientometrics, 67(3) (2006) 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Hirsch, Does the h-index have predictive power?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(49) (2007) 19193–19198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Q. L. Burrell, Hirsch index of Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data, Scientometrics, 73(1) (2007) 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Schreiber, A case study of Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists, Ann. Phys., 16(9) (2007) 640–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Costas, M. Bordons, Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level, Scientometrics, 77(2) (2008) 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. I. Meho, Y. Rogers, Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison between Scopus and Web of Science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11) (2008) 1711–1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Glänzel, On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67(2) (2006) 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Basu, A note on the connection between the Hirsch index and the Random Hierarchical model, ISSI Newsletter, 3(2) (2007) 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Q. L. Burrell, Hirsch’s h-index: A stochastic model, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (2007) 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Rousseau, The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (2007) 2.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Egghe, Time-dependent Lotkaian informetrics incorporating growth of sources and items, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7–8) (2007) 864–872.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. G. J. Woeginger, An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index, Mathematical Social Sciences, 56(2) (2008) 224–232.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Egghe, An improvement of the h-index: the g-index, ISSI Newsletter, 2(1) (2006) 8–9.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Egghe, Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kosmulski, A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index, ISSI Newsletter, 2(3) (2006) 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, A. S. Martinez, Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1) (2006) 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Jin, L. Liang, R. Rousseau, L. Egghe, The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index, Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6) (2007) 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Sidiropoulos, D. Katsaros, Y. Manolopoulos, Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks, Scientometrics, 72(2) (2007) 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. J. Woeginger, An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index, Journal of Informetrics, (2008) In press, doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.002.

  27. M. Kosmulski, MAXPROD — A new index for assessment of the scientific output of an individual, and a comparison with the h-index, Cybermetrics, 11(1) (2007).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Gągolewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gągolewski, M., Grzegorzewski, P. A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices. Scientometrics 81, 617–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2253-y

Keywords

Navigation