Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surviving bad times: The role of citations, self-citations and numbers of citable items in recovery of the journal impact factor after at least four years of continuous decreases

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the influence of the number of citations, the number of citable items and the number of journal self-citations on increases in the impact factor (IF) in 123 journals from the Journal Citation Reports database in which this scientometric indicator had decreased during the previous four years. In general, we did not find evidence that abuse of journal self-citations contributed to the increase in the impact factor after several years of decreases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade, A., González-Jonte, R., Campanario, J. M. (2009), Journals that increase their impact factor at least fourfold in a few years: the role of journal self-citations. Scientometrics, (in press).

  • Campanario, J. M., González, L. (2006), Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: Documents labeled “editorial material” in journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69: 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Alexiou, V. G. (2007), Editors may inappropriately influence authors’ decisions regarding selection of references in scientific articles. International Journal of Impotence Research, 19: 443–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, T. B. (2008), On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journals. Scientometrics, 74, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Moed, H. F. (2002), Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golubic, R., Rudes, M., Kovacic, N., Marusic, M., Marusic, A. (2008), Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14: 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, L., Campanario, J. M. (2007), Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index: Citations from documents labeled “editorial material”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 252–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannino, D. M. (2005), Impact factor, impact, and smoke and mirrors. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 171: 417–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, J., Counsell, C. (2002), Impact factors: uses and abuses. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14: 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Juan Miguel Campanario & Antonio Molina

Authors
  1. Juan Miguel Campanario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Molina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Miguel Campanario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campanario, J.M., Molina, A. Surviving bad times: The role of citations, self-citations and numbers of citable items in recovery of the journal impact factor after at least four years of continuous decreases. Scientometrics 81, 859–864 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2257-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2257-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation