Abstract
Interdisciplinarity can be manifest in many forms: through collaboration or communication between scientists working in different fields or through the work of individual scientists who employ concepts or methods across disciplines. This latter form of interdisciplinarity is addressed here with the goal of understanding how ideas in different fields come together to create new opportunities for discovery. Maps of science are used to suggest possible interdisciplinary links which are then analyzed by co-citation context analysis. Interdisciplinary links are identified by juxtaposing a clustering and mapping of documents against a journal-based categorization of the same document clusters. Links between clusters are characterized as interdisciplinary based on the dissonance of their category assignments. To verify and probe more deeply into the meaning of interdisciplinary links, co-citation contexts for selected links from five separate cases are analyzed in terms of prominent cue words. This analysis reveals that interdisciplinary connections are often based on authors’ perceptions of analogous problems across scientific domains. Cue words drawn from the citation contexts also suggest that these connections are viewed as important and ripe with both opportunity and risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Report to the higher education funding council for England: Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Leeds: Evidence Ltd.
Ball, P. (2008). Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chemical Reviews, 108, 74–108.
Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.
Bröner, K., Chen, C. M., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.
Chen, Q. Z., Harding, S. E., Ali, N. N., Lyon, A. R., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2008). Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: Ten years of research survey. Materials Science and Engineering R, 59(1–6), 1–37.
Di Marco, C., & Mercer, R. E. (2004). Hedging in scientific articles as a means of classifying citations. Working nodes of the American association for artificial intelligence. https://www.aaai.org/papers/symposia/spring/2004/ss-04-07/ss04-07-009.pdf.
Dunbar, K. (1994). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
ESI. (2008). Essential science indicators. Thomson Reuters. http://sciencewatch.com/about/met/rf-methodology/.
Feig, M., Chocholousova, J., & Tanizaki, S. (2006). Extending the horizon: Towards the efficient modeling of large biomolecular complexes in atomic detail. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 116, 194–205.
Finney, B. (1979). Reference characteristics of scientific texts. Master’s thesis. The City University of London, London.
Fischbach, M. A., & Walsh, C. T. (2006). Assembly-line enzymology for polyketide and nonribosomal peptide antibiotics: Logic, machinery and mechanisms. Chemical Reviews, 106, 3468–3496.
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software- Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
Gray, H. B. (2003). Biological inorganic chemistry at the beginning of the 21st century. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100(7), 3563–3568.
Gunner, M. R., Mao, J., Song, Y., & Kim, J. (2006). Factors influencing the energetics of electron and proton transfers in proteins. What can be learned from calculations? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1757, 942–968.
Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.
Hoeben, F. J. M., Jonkheijm, P., Meijer, E. W., & Schenning, A. P. H. J. (2005). About supramolecular assemblies of pi-conjugated systems. Chemical Reviews, 105, 1491–1546.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1996). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Hu, H., & Yang, W. (2009). Development and application of ab initio QM/MM methods for mechanistic simulation of reactions in solution and in enzymes. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 898, 17–30.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Interfacing ab initio quantum mechanical method with classical Durde oscillator polarizable model for molecular dynamics simulation of chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 4, 1237–1248.
Mercer, R. E., DiMarco, C., & Kroon, F. W. (2004). Frequency of hedging cues in citation contexts in scientific writing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3060, 77–88.
Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, D. J., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.
Roy, M. S., Balraju, P., Deol, Y. S., Sharma, S. K., & Sharma, G. D. (2008). Charge-transport and photocurrent generation in bulk heterojunction based on chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine (CIAIPc) and rose Bengal (RB). Journal of Materials Science, 43, 5551–5563.
Schneider, J. (2006). Concept symbols revisited: Naming clusters by parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols. Scientometrics, 68(3), 573–593.
Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183–196.
Small, H. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 97–110.
Small, H. (1999). A passage through science: Crossing disciplinary boundaries. Library Trends, 48(1), 72–108.
Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations: 2. Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8(5–6), 321–340.
Small, H., & Upham, P. (2009). Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application. Scientometrics, 79(2), 365–375.
Tongers, J., Webber, M. J., & Losordo, D. W. (2009). Bioengineering to enhance progenitor cell therapeutics. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 36(2), 140–144.
Vaillancourt, F. H., Yeh, E., Vosburg, D. A., Gameau-Tsodikova, S., & Walsh, C. T. (2006). Nature’s inventory of halogenation catalysts: Oxidative strategies predominate. Chemical Reviews, 106, 3364–3378.
Van Lanen, S. G., & Shen, B. (2006). Microbial genomics for the improvement of natural product discovery. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 9, 252–260.
Wilkins, J. S. (2008). The adaptive landscape of science. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 659–671.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Small, H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: co-citation contexts and the role of analogy. Scientometrics 83, 835–849 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0121-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0121-z