Abstract
The uncitedness factor of a journal is its fraction of uncited articles. Given a set of journals (e.g. in a field) we can determine the rank-order distribution of these uncitedness factors. Hereby we use the Central Limit Theorem which is valid for uncitedness factors since it are fractions, hence averages. A similar result was proved earlier for the impact factors of a set of journals. Here we combine the two rank-order distributions, hereby eliminating the rank, yielding the functional relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor. It is proved that the decreasing relation has an S-shape: first convex, then concave and that the inflection point is in the point (μ′, μ) where μ is the average of the impact factors and μ′ is the average of the uncitedness factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egghe, L. (2008). The mathematical relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor. Scientometrics, 76(1), 117–123.
Egghe, L. (2009). Mathematical derivation of the impact factor distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 290–295.
Mansilla, R., Köppen, E., Cocho, G., & Miramontes, P. (2007). On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 155–160.
van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2005). Characterisics of journal impact factors: the effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 357–371.
Acknowledgement
The author is grateful to Prof. Dr. R. Rousseau for his advise of using the Central Limit Theorem in the treatment of this problem.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egghe, L. The distribution of the uncitedness factor and its functional relation with the impact factor. Scientometrics 83, 689–695 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0130-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0130-y