Skip to main content
Log in

Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Opinions in the literature on the possible relationship between co-authorship and number of citations vary. This paper contributes to the debate with a further analysis of the subject, taking account of the number and quality of citations found for multi-(author, institution, country) and single-authored papers.

The study is based on the scientific production of ten Carlos III University of Madrid departmental areas between 1997 and 2003 as reflected in the ISI Web of Science, and the number of times the respective papers were cited between 1997 and 2004. Univariate multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to verify the relationship between multi-authorship and visibility. The correlation between multi-institutional and multi-national authorship and the quartile of the citing journals was analyzed with correspondence analysis.

The results show that while multi-institutional and multi-national authorship raise the number of citations, co-authorship and number of citations are unrelated. Correspondence analysis failed to show any correlation between the quartile of the citing journal and multi-institutional or multinational authorship, but did reveal a relationship between citing journal quartile and departmental area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt, H. (1984), Citations to single and multiauthored papers. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 96(583): 746–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N. K. (1997), Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2): 173–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E. (1982), A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3): 527–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. B. (1986), Collaboration and teamwork in Physics. Czech. J. Phys., 36: 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., García Jover, F., Barrigón, S. (1993), Is collaboration improving research visibility? Research Evaluation, 3(1): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Gómez, I. (2000), Collaboration networks in science. In: B. Cronin, H. B. Atkins (Eds.): The Web of Knowledge: A festschrift in honour of Eugene Garfield. New Jersey: ASIS, pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, M. (1991), The quality of single and multiple authored papers — an unsolved problem. Scientometrics, 21(1): 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, J. L., Hernán, M. A. (1993), Estadística Multivariante en las Ciencias de la Vida. Madrid: Cibest; Ciencia 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrán Aranaz, M. (1997), SPSS Para Windows: Programación y Análisis Estadístico. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1986), Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Annals of Internal Medicine, 105: 313–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1996), Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, (313): 411–13.

  • Glänzel, W. (2000), Science in Scandinavia: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2): 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. (1997), How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. In: B. C. Peritz, L. Egghe: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. (Jerusalem), Israel: AHVA Coop. Printing Press Ltd., 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1986), Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1–2): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu, R., Koricheva, J. (2005), Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5): 438–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oromaner, M. (1975), Collaboration and impact — career of multi-authored publications. Social Science Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 14(1): 147–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., Danell, R. (2004), Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3): 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez López, C. (1996), Econometría y Análisis Estadístico Multivariable con Statgraphics: Técnicas Avanzadas. Madrid: RA-MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1992), Why am I not cited or why are multiauthored papers more cited than others. Journal of Documentation, 48(1): 79–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1997), Science as an international enterprise. Science and Public Policy, 24(5): 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elías Sanz-Casado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iribarren-Maestro, I., Lascurain-Sánchez, M.L. & Sanz-Casado, E. Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics 79, 191–200 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0412-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0412-4

Keywords

Navigation