Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Countries positioning in open access journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By their widespread availability and dissemination through open access media, scholarly outputs witness an improved visibility supposed to cause a better citation performance. However, due to the existence of the Matthew effect in science system, which affects users’ perceptions of quality, ultimate effects of the enhanced visibility on different entities are obscure. Moreover, different attitudes towards open access give rise to a more strong quality dynamics in the open access world. Aiming to explore the consequence of the interaction between visibility and quality dynamics, this study investigates countries positioning in open access journals. The results show that the world’s countries welcome open access pattern whether by submitting to or publishing open access journals. A large proportion of the enduring, prestigious open access journals are published by scientifically proficient and developing nations, emphasizing their successful commitment to maintain the undertaken role. The results of the citation analysis highlight national inequalities regarding citation distributions among countries contributing to the journals within the system and within individual disciplines in the system. Well-performing countries mainly consist of advanced ones; however, some lessdeveloped nations are found to perform well in the journal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antelman, K. (2004), Do OA articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5): 372–382. Retrieved May 3, 2005, from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M. (1997), The scientific talents of nations. Libri, 47: 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M. (2002), Ranking of nations heightened competition in Matthew Core journals: two faces of the Matthew effect for countries. Library Trends, 50(3): 440–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E., Scharnhorst, A. (1999), The Matthew index: Concentration patterns and Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 44(3): 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M., Scharnhorst, A. (2001), Competition in science the Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 51(1): 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E., Scharnhorst, A., Peritz B. C., Egghe L. (1997), Characteristic impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics, 40(3): 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C., Furner, J. (2002), Scholarly communication bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science Technology, 36, Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., pp. 3–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Maczelka, H., Schubert, A. (1994a), World science in the eighties: national performances in publication output citation impact, 1985–89 versus 1980–1984, Part I. All science fields combined, physics chemistry. Scientometrics, 29(3): 299–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Maczelka, H., Schubert, A. (1994b), World science in the eighties: national performances in publication output citation impact, 1985–89 versus 1980–1984, Part II. life sciences, engineering mathematics. Scientometrics, 31(1): 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1985), Scientometric Indicators. A 32-Country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance Citation Impact, World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore — Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1987), One more version of the facts figures on publication output relative citation impact of 107 countries, 1978–1980, Scientometrics, 11: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1988a), The newest version of the facts figures on publication output relative citation impact of 100 countries, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 13: 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1988b), The newest version of the facts figures on publication output relative citation impact in the life Sciences chemistry, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 14: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1988c), The newest version of the facts figures on publication output relative citation impact in physics, engineering, mathematics, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 14: 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1989), The newest version of the facts figures on publication output relative citation impact. A collection of relational charts, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 15: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1993), Scientometric indicators datafiles, 1980–1989, Scientometrics, 28: 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Harnad, S., Gingras, Y., Vallieres, F., Oppenheim C. (2004), The effect of OA on citation impact. Presented at: National Policies on OA (OA), Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting. Southampton University, Southampton UK. 19 February 2004. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2004), The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series the flow of scientific communication through the world wide web. Scientometrics, 60(1): 25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (2001a), The coming of age of E-prints in the literature of physics. Issues in Science Technology Librarianship, 31 (Summer), Retrieved August 3, 2004, from http://www.istl.org/01-summer.

  • Brown, C. M. (2001b), The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(3): 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (2003), The role of electronic preprints in chemical communication: Analysis of citation, usage, acceptance in the journal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology, 54(5): 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L., Costa, S. (2005), Participation in the global knowledge commons: challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries. New Library World, 106(1210/1211): 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L., Kirsop, B. (2001), Open Archiving opportunities for developing countries: Towards equitable distribution of global knowledge. Ariadne, 30, Retrieved October 2, 2005 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk./issue30/oai-chan.

  • Cole, S. (1992), Making Science. Between Nature and Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (2000), The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge. In: Cronin, B. Atkins, H. O. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honour of Eugene Garfield, Information Today, Inc. Medford, NJ, pp. 102–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G. (2006a). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5): e157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G. (2006b). The open access advantage, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2): e8. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.jmir.org/2006/2/e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1970), Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227: 669–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972), Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178: 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, W. W. (1995), Lost science in the Third World, Scientific American, 273(2): 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, J. (2005), The Geographic Distribution of Open Access Journals. Retrieved January 1, 2006, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/939/01/icml9%5Fposter%5Fhaider.pdf.

  • Hajjem, C., Gingras, Y., Brody T., Carr, L., Harnad, S. (2005a), Open Access to Research Increases Citation Impact. Retrieved September, 10, 2005, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11687/01/chawki2.doc.

  • Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., Gingras, Y. (2005), Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of OA how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 28(4): 39–46. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http://sites.computer.org/debull/A05dec/hajjem.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S., Brody, T. (2004), Comparing the impact of OA (OA), vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html.

  • Harnad, S. (2003), The research-impact cycle. Information Services & Use, 23: 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., Hilf, E. (2004), The access/impact problem the green gold roads to OA. Serials Review 30(4), Retrieved May 4, 2005, from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013.

  • Hilgartner, S. (1995), Biomolecular databases: New communication regimes for biology? Science Communication, 17(2): 240–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, S., Bergmark, D., Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L., Hall, W., Lagoze, C., Harnad, S. (2002), Open Citation Linking: the way forward. D-Lib Magazine, 8 (Oct.), Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/hitchcock/10hitchcock.

  • Hitchcock, S., Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L., Harnad, S. (2003), The Impact of OAI-based Search on Access to Research Journal Papers. Retrieved September 10, 2005 from http://opcit.eprints.org/serials-short/serials11.html.

  • Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. (1995), The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach. Proceeding of The Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics & Informetrics, Rosary College, River Forest, Il, USA, June 7–10, 1995. Retrieved September 5, 2004, from www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/ClassInterdiscJournals.pdf.

  • Katz, J. S. (1999a), The self similar science system, Research Policy, 28: 501–517. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S. (1999b), Bibliometric Indicators the Social Sciences, Prepared for the ESRC. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

  • Katz, J. S. (2000), Scale-independent indicators research evaluation, Science Public Policy, 24(1): 23–36 (14), Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. A. (2004), Scientific wealth of nations, Nature, 430: 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S, Demleitner, M., Hennekan E., Murray, S. S. (2005), The effect of use & access on citations. Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1395–1402. Retrieved November 17, 2005, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0503029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S., Martimbeau, N. Elwell, B. (2004a), The bibliometric properties of article readership information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology, 56(2): 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Stern-Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S. (2004b), Worldwide use impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 56(1): 36–45. Retrieved May 3, 2005, from http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/:_kurtz/jasist1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, L. L. (2002), The impact factor as a phantom: Is there a self-fulfilling prophecy effect of impact. Journal of Documentation, 58(2): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., Macroberts, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3): 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., Macroberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5): 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275: 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (2000), Sharing digitized research-related information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology, 51(14): 1321–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, M. E. (2004), Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors Citation Patterns. A citation study, from Thomson Scientific (Document technique), Thomson Scientific. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/essayspdf /openaccesscitations2.pdf.

  • Meadows, J. (1997), Can we really see where electronic journals are going? Library Management, 18(3): 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810): 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1988), The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS 79: 606–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1995), The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74(2): 379–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, D., Huntington P., Rowlands, I. (2005), Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world’s senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61(4): 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odlyzko, A. M. (2002), The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing, 15(1): 7–19. Retrieved May 3, 2005, from http://www.catchword.com/alpsp/09531513/v15n1/contp1-1.htm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. N. R. (2001), Science in the rising nations [editorial]. Current Science, 81(8): 915–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha-E-Silva, M. (2006), Publishing science in developing countries. CLINICS, 61(5):375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., Braun, T. (1989), Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals 96 countries in all major science fields subfields, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 16: 3–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotudeh, H., Horri, A. (2007a), The citation performance of open access journals: a disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(13): 2145–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotudeh, H., Horri, A. (2007b), Tracking open access journals evolution: Some considerations in OA data collection validation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(11): 1578–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotudeh, H., Horri, A. (2008), Great expectations: the role of open access in improving countries’ recognition. Scientometrics 76(1): 69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, A., Brown, S. (2004a), Authors open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17(3): 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, A., Brown, S. (2004b), JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. Truro, Key Perspectives Ltd. Retrieved September 22, 2004, from http://wwww.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, J. Mcveigh, M. E. (2004), The Impact of Open Access Journals: A Citation Study, from Thomson ISI. Retrieved December 12, 2004, from http://isinet.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oajournals.pdf.

  • Thomas, W. I., Thomas, D. S. (1928), The childe in America: Behavior problems programs, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY. In: Lange, L. L. (2002), The Impact Factor as a Phantom: Is there a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Effect of Impact. Journal of Documentation, 58(2):175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, L. Jackson, B,. Wong A. Yoda T. (2001), Science Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries? MR-1357-0-WB. Santa Monica, CA. Rand Science Technology. Retrieved August 27, 2004, from www.rand.org/

  • Warr, W. A. (2003), Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server. Journal of Chemical Information Computer Science, 43: 362–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welljams-Dorof, A. (1997), Quantitative citation data as indicators in science evaluations: A primer on their appropriate use. In: M. S. Frankel & Cave J. (Eds), Evaluating Science & Scientists. An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngen, G. K. (1998), Citation patterns to traditional electronic preprints in the published literature. College & Research Libraries, 59(5): 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D. (2005), Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science — A comparison of author visibility on the web in print journals. Information Processing & Management, 41: 1403–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Library and Information Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Hajar Sotudeh

  2. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Horri

Authors
  1. Hajar Sotudeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Horri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajar Sotudeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotudeh, H., Horri, A. Countries positioning in open access journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns. Scientometrics 81, 7–31 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-1870-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-1870-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation