Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research culture and New Zealand’s performance-based research fund: some insights from bibliographic compilations of research outputs

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Year-on-year trends in research outputs show increases in research activity as the date of the research assessment exercise—in New Zealand the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF)—looms. Moreover, changes with time in the number and types of conference presentation indicate that the vehicle of publication is also being influenced by the PBRF. Within New Zealand business schools, relating the published journal articles to the Australian Business Deans Council rankings list shows a trend towards more publications of lower rank, raising doubts about whether the rhetoric about the PBRF raising the quality of research is really justified. This ‘drive’ towards increasing numbers of research outputs is also fostered by an increasing trend towards co-authorship in publishing across all disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (2008). The future of the British RAE: the REF (Research Excellence Framework). Forum on “Measuring Research Performance: What are the Options?” Wellington, 18 September 2008.

  • Anderson, D. L., & Tressler, J. (2008). Research output in New Zealand economics departments 2000–2006: A stock approach. New Zealand Economic Papers, 42(2), 155–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Business Deans Council. (2008). Combined journal lists. Retrieved September 7, 2009, from http://www.abdc.edu.au/download.php?id=1373084,192,1.

  • Barker, K. (2007). The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The evolution of a national research evaluation system. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. (2006). Methodology for citation analysis. RQF pilot study project—History and political science, Council for the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.chass.org.au/papers/PAP20061102LB.php.

  • Clark, J. (2009, April). Bibliometrics Conference Report [Report on the National and Institutional Perspectives on Metrics-based Research Evaluation Conference, Brisbane, Australia]. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from www.library.otago.ac.nz/pdf/BibliometricseventBrisbane_2_.pdf.

  • Corbyn, Z. (2008). RAE results may not reflect true quality of UK research, warns chair. Times Higher Education, 4 December 2008. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=404590.

  • Doyle, J. R., & Arthurs, A. J. (2000). Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study. Omega, 23(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFMD. (2009). EQUIS [European Quality Improvement System] standards and criteria (p. 46). Brussels, Belgium: European Foundation for Management Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal analysis. Science, 178, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2008). UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgements on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 74(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, N. (2000). Why it is fundamentally stupid for a business school to try and improve its research assessment exercise score. European Journal of Marketing, 34(1/2), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, W. (2007). Quality vs impact: A comparison of performance-based research fund quality scores with citations. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/tertiary_education/11766.

  • Smart, W. (2009, April). The use of bibliometrics to measure the performance of New Zealand’s tertiary education system. Paper presented at the National and Institutional Perspectives on Metrics Based Research Evaluation, Biometrics Conference, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Smith, A. G. (2008). Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise. Scientometrics, 74(2), 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staff and Student Research. (2000–2007). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.

  • Taylor, H., & Dillon, S. (2007). The changing face of IS research—A longitudinal citation study of author influence. Research Report Series, Department of Management Systems, University of Waikato, 2007-05.

  • Tertiary Education Commission. (2004). Performance-based research fund evaluating research excellence: The 2003 assessment (p. 278). Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertiary Education Commission. (2007). Performance-based research fund evaluating research excellence: The 2006 assessment (p. 314). Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Commerce and Administration, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    A. Peter W. Hodder

  2. HodderBalog—Writing Editing Publishing, 41 Burma Road, Khandallah, Wellington, New Zealand

    A. Peter W. Hodder & Catherine Hodder

Authors
  1. A. Peter W. Hodder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Hodder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Hodder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hodder, A.P.W., Hodder, C. Research culture and New Zealand’s performance-based research fund: some insights from bibliographic compilations of research outputs. Scientometrics 84, 887–901 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0201-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0201-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation