Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a research program to analyse research in Bangladesh we provide a comparison between research indicators related to India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In this investigation we make use of Web of Science (WoS) data as well as Scopus data (using the SCImago website). Special attention is given to collaboration data and to the evolution of country h-indices. A comparison based on relative quality indicators shows that Sri Lanka is the best performer among these four countries. Such a result agrees with the ranking of these countries according to the United Nations’ Human Development Index (HDI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arunachalam, S. (2008). The science race continues in Asia. Current Science, 94(7), 848–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2008). South–South collaboration: the case of Indo-Chinese collaboration in scientific research. Current Science, 95(3), 311–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaram, P. (2004). Science and technology proficiency: China and India. Current Science, 86(6), 755–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, R. E., & Moed, H. F. (1990). The unification of addresses in scientific publications. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90 (pp. 65–78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Gupta, B. M. (2008). Science in India. A bibliometric study of national research performance in 1991–2006. ISSI Newsletter, 4(3), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gua, X., & Guan, J. C. (2009). A scale independent analysis of the performance of the Chinese innovation system. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2004). A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, 61, 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M., & Mishra, P. K. (2002). S&T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries. Current Science, 83, 1201–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, A. L. (2007). National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 17943–17947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. X., & Rousseau, R. (2008). Definitions of time series in citation analysis with special attention to the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2008). Scientific research in Bangladesh and a comparison with India and Pakistan. In H. Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Eds.), Proceedings of WIS 2008; Fourth internal conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & ninth COLLNET meeting, 2008. http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/MahbubaWIS2008srb.pdf.

  • Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: Comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), ISSI 2009; 12th international conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 702–713). São Paulo: BIREME and Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

  • Meyer, B. (2006). The unspoken revolution in software engineering. Computer, 39(1), 121–124.

  • Molinari, J.-F., & Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 75, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadana, R., D’Souza, C., Hyder, A. A., & Chowdhury, A. M. R. (2004). Importance of health research in South Asia. BMJ, 328, 826–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from http://www.scimagojr.com.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dilruba Mahbuba thanks the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), Bangladesh; 68 Shahid Tajuddin Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh for their financial support. Most research for this article was done while she was a member of the Centre. The authors thank the reviewers for some pertinent observations improving the presentation of our contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Rousseau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahbuba, D., Rousseau, R. Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant. Scientometrics 84, 403–420 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0203-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0203-y

Keywords

Navigation