Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal and cross-sectional study of registered nurses in Sweden who undertake a PhD showing that nurses continue to publish in English after their PhD but male nurses are more productive than female nurses

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of 649 PhDs undertaken by Swedish nurses and midwives found no evidence that they stop publishing in English after their PhD. The proportion of 70% for any publication in English was similar to that of MDs. A higher proportion of male than female nurses were high publishers of six or more (52% vs. 23%) and eight or more papers (44% vs. 14%) in a 5 year period. The standard of the PhDs of Swedish nurses was comparable to those of other biomedical PhDs and was consistent in pattern over the past two decades. The gender pattern of external examiners of female nurses evolved in that 1992–94, 75% were men, during 1996–97, 54% were men and from 2000 onwards 46% were men. Nurses were examined by foreign examiners in 20% of examinations. They came primarily from Norway and USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breimer, L. H. (1996a). Age, sex and standards of current doctoral theses by Swedish medical graduates. Scientometrics, 37, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H. (1996b). Authorship and usage of published papers in current Swedish biomedical theses. Scientometrics, 36, 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H. (2010a). Swedish biomedical PhD examination: An international forum and a proposed procedure for Europe. Scientometrics, 83, 583–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H. (2010b). A group comparison between Swedish MD-PhDs of 1991 and 2000. The Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (JIAMSE), 20, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H., & Breimer, D. D. (1995). A computer-based international “Thesis-line”? Trends in Biochemical Sciences (TiBS), 20, 175–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H., & Mikhailidis, D. P. (1991). A thesis for all seasons. Nature, 353, 789–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H., & Mikhailidis, D. P. (1993). Towards a doctoral thesis through published works. Biomedicine and pharmacotherapy, 47, 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H., & Nilsson, T. K. (2010). A longitudinal and cross-sectional study of Swedish biomedical PhD processes 1991–2009 with emphasis on international and gender aspects. Scientometrics (in press). doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0227-3.

  • Calltorp, J., Adami, H. O., Aström, H., Fryklund, L., Rossner, S., Trolle, Y., et al. (1996). Country profile: Sweden. Lancet, 347, 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission). (2003). She Figures 2003. Women and Science Statistics and Indicators. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities. (114pp). 114. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/she_figures_2003.pdf.

  • Gannon, F., Norman, J., Kriis, M., Walker, A., & Breimer, L. (1997). EMBO fellows go home. Nature, 388, 416–417—with supplementary data on the EMBO web-site: http://www.embo.org—as Survey of EMBO long term fellows: EMBO 1984/985 fellowships—where do all the fellows go? EMBO web-site: http://www.embo.org.

  • Socialstyrelsen. (2009). Statistik om hälso-och sjukvårdspersonal—officiell statistik om antal legitimerade (2008) och arbetsmarknadsstatus (2007). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars H. Breimer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breimer, L.H., Leksell, J. Longitudinal and cross-sectional study of registered nurses in Sweden who undertake a PhD showing that nurses continue to publish in English after their PhD but male nurses are more productive than female nurses. Scientometrics 87, 337–345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0325-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0325-2

Keywords

Navigation